Marking topic boundaries in signed interpretation and transliteration

From Topic Boundaries to Omission

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 187-227

  Winston, Elizabeth ^a   Monikowski, Christine ^b  

^a Elizabeth Winston Educational Linguistics Center   (United States)

^b ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903039027     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Bahan, B. J., & Supalla, S. J. (1995). Line segmentation and narrative structure. In K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (Eds.), Language, gesture, and space. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Brentari, D. (1998). A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
3. Colonomos, B. (1992). Processes in interpreting and transliterating: Making them work for you. Videotape. Westminster, CO: Front Range Community College.
4. Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Livingston, S., Singer, B., & Abramson, T. (1995). A study to determine the effectiveness of two different kinds of interpreting. In E. Winston (Ed.), Mapping our course: A collaborative venture. Proceedings of the tenth national convention of CIT (pp. 175-204). N.p.: Conference of Interpreter Trainers.
6. Locker McKee, R. (1992). Footing shifts in American Sign Language lectures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
7. Mather, S. A. (1989). Visually oriented teaching strategies with deaf preschool children. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Sociolinguistics of the Deaf community (pp. 165-190). San Diego: Academic Press.
8. Mather, S., & Winston, E. A. (1995). Spatial mapping and involvement in ASL story-telling. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Pinky extension and eye gaze (pp. 183-210). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
9. McIntire, M. L. (1993). Getting out of line (and into space): A perspective on strategies for student interpreters. In E. Winston (Ed.), Student competencies: Defining, teaching, and evaluating (Proceedings of the Ninth National Convention of CIT, pp. 61-74). N.p.: Conference of Interpreter Trainers.
10. Metzger, M. (1995). Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Sociolinguistics in Deaf communities (pp. 255-271). Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities series, vol. 1. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
11. Metzger, M. and B. Bahan. (2001). Discourse analysis. In C. Lucas (Ed.). The Sociolinguistics of sign languages (pp. 112-144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Nespor, M., & Sandler, W. (1999). Prosody in Israeli Sign Language (Parts 2 and 3). Language and Speech, 42, 143-176.
13. Nida, E. A. (1953). Selective listening. Language Learning, 4(3), 92-101.
14. Ochs, E. (1979). Planned and unplanned discourse. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 12. Discourse and syntax (pp. 51-80). New York: Academic Press.
15. Roy, C. (1989). Features of discourse in an American Sign Language lecture. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Sociolinguistics of the Deaf community (pp. 231-252). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16. Sign Enhancers. (1994a). Living Fully: With Interpreting Models. [Videotape, #INT-LF]. Salem, OR: Author.
17. Sign Enhancers. (1994b). Living Fully: With Transliterating Models. [Videotape, #TR-LF]. Salem, OR: Author.
18. Siple, L. (1993). Interpreters' use of pausing in voice to sign transliteration. Sign Language Studies, 79, 147-180.
19. Siple, L. (1995). The use of addition in sign language transliteration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New York, Buffalo, N Y.
20. Sofinski, B., Yesbeck, N., Gerhold, S., & Bach-Hansen, M. (2001). Features of voice-to-sign transliteration by educational interpreters. Journal of Interpretation, 47-68.
21. Stauffer, L. K., & Viera, J. (2000). Transliteration: A comparison of consumer needs and transliterator preparation and practice. Journal of Interpretation, 61-82.
22. Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Studies in interactional sociolinguistics: Vol. 6. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Wilbur, R. (1994). Eyeblinks and ASL phrase structure. Sign Language Studies, 84, 221-240.
24. Winston, E. A. (1989). Transliteration: What's the message? In C. Lucas (Ed.), Sociolinguistics of the Deaf community (pp. 147-164). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25. Winston, E. A. (1990). Techniques for improving accent in sign language interpreters. In A. L. Wilson (Ed.), Looking ahead: Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the American Translators Association (pp. 47-58). Medford, NJ: Learned Information.
26. Winston, E. A. (1995). Spatial mapping in comparative discourse frames. In K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (Eds.), Language, gesture, and space (pp. 87-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Winston, E. A. (2000). It just doesn't look like ASL! Defining, recognizing, and teaching prosody in ASL. In CIT at 21: Celebrating excellence, celebrating partnership. Proceedings of the 13th National Convention of CIT (pp. 103-116). Silver Spring, MD: RID Publications.
28. Winston, E. A., & Monikowski, C. (2000). Discourse mapping: Developing textual coherence skills in interpreters. In C. Roy (Ed.), Innovative practices for teaching sign language interpreters (pp. 15-66). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.