Automatic analysis of the prosodic variations in Parkinsonian read and semi-spontaneous speech

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Speech Prosody, SP 2012

Volumn 1, Issue , 2012, Pages 71-74

  De Looze, Céline ^a   Ghio, Alain ^b   Scherer, Stefan ^a   Pouchoulin, Gilles ^b   Viallet, François ^b  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Automatic measurements and tools; Dysprosody; Interpausal run; Parkinson disease; Prosodic variations

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SPEECH;

AUTOMATIC MEASUREMENTS; DYSPROSODY; INTERPAUSAL RUN; PARKINSON DISEASE; PROSODIC VARIATIONS;

CONTINUOUS SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 84902997491     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Canter, G. J. Speech characteristics of patients with Parkinson's disease: Intensity, pitch and duration, J. Speech Hearing Des., Vol 28, pp 217-224. 1963.
2. Monrad-Krohn GH. Dysprosody or altered melody of language. Brain. 70: 405-415, 1947.
3. Darley FL, Aronson AE, Brown JR. Motor speech disorders. W.B. Saunders and Co., 1975.
4. Weismer, G., Acoustic description of dysarthric speech: Perception correlates and physiological inferences, Rosenbeck, C. J. (ed), Seminar in speech and language, Thieme Stratton, New York, p 324. 1984.
5. Caekebeke, J. F. V., Jenekens-Schinkel, A., van der Linden, M. E., Buruma, O. J. S., & Roos R. A. C. The interpretation of dysprosody in patients with Parkinson's disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 54, 145-148. 1991.
6. Ho Ak Iansek& Bradshaw. Regulation of parkinsonian speech volume: the effect of interlocutor distance. Journal of Neurology & Psychiatry: 67: 199-202. 1999.
7. Teston A & Viallet L.'évaluation objective de la prosodie in Les dysarthries, Ed: Auzou et al. Problèmes en médecine de rééducation. Masson. Paris p 109-121. 2001.
8. Duez, D. (2006). Syllable structure, syllable duration and final lengthening in parkinsonian French speech. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, vol. 4, no. 1. 2006, p. 45-57.
9. Cheang, H.S. and Pell, M.D. An acoustic investigation of Parkinsonian speech in linguistic and emotional contexts, Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20, 221-241. 2007.
10. Kent R., Ball M., Voice quality measurement, Singular Publ. Group, Inc., 492 p. 2000.
11. De Looze, C. Analyse et interprétation de l'empan temporel des variations prosodiques en français et en anglais contemporain. Doctoral thesis, Université de Provence, 2010.
12. De Jong, N. H. & Wempe, T. Praat script to detect nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Journal of Behavior research methods: Vol. 41, Nr. 2 pp. 385-390, 2009.
13. Boersma, P. & Weenink D. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program], 2011 http://www.praat.org/
14. Fahn, S., Elton R. L., & Members of the UPDRS Development Committee. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. In S. Fahn, C. D. Marsden, D. B. Calne, & M. Goldstein (Eds.), Recent development in Parkinson's disease: Vol. 2 (pp. 153-164). Newark, NJ: Macmillan Healthcare, 1987.
15. Ghio, A.; Pouchoulin, G.; Teston, B.; Pinto, S.; Fredouille, C.; De Looze, C.; Robert, D.; Viallet, F.; Giovanni, A. How to manage sound, physiological and clinical data of 2500 dysphonic and dysarthric speakers? Speech Communication, 16p., 2011.
16. Goldman, J.-P., EasyAligner: a semi-automatic phonetic alignment tool under Praat, 2007 Available at http://latcui.unige.ch/phonetique.
17. [ Audibert N.;Fougeron C.;Fredouille C.;Meunier C.;Panseri O. Evaluation d'un alignement automatique sur la parole dysarthrique. Journées d'Etude sur la Parole, p1-4 2010.