The Reporter's handbook: On nuclear materials, energy, and waste management

The Reporter's Handbook: On Nuclear Materials, Energy, and Waste Management

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-306

  Greenberg, Michael R ^a   West, Bernadette M ^b   Lowrie, Karen W ^c   Mayer, Henry J ^c  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

^c Rutgers University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902907186     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (300)

1. Makhijani, A. (2007, August). Carbon-free and nuclear-free: A roadmap for U.S. energy policy. Science for Democratic Action, 15(1).
2. Ayres, R. (1998). The turning point: The end of the growth paradigm. London: Earthscan.
3. Commoner, B. (1971). Closing the circle. New York: Knopf.
4. Sandman, P. (1993). Responding to community outrage: Strategies for effective risk communication. Fairfax, VA: AIHA Press.
5. Simon, J. (1990). People, resources, environment, and immigration. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
6. American Nuclear Society home page. www.ans.org.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Emergency preparedness and response: radiation emergencies. www.bt.cdc.gov/radiation.
8. Health Physics Society home page. hps.org.
9. International Atomic Energy Agency. Factsheets and FAQs: Radiation in everyday life. www.iaea.org/Publications/Factsheets/English/radlife.html.
10. National Academy of Sciences. Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board home page. dels.nas.edu/nrsb.
11. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements home page. www.ncrponline.org.
12. Nuclear Energy Institute home page. www.nei.org.
13. National Research Council. Committee on Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR V). (1990). Radiogenic cancers. In Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. Washington, DC: National Academies of Science. Available at books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record-id=1224#toc.
14. Physicians for Social Responsibility home page. www.psr.org.
15. Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training Site (REAC/TS) (part of Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education) home page. orise.orau.gov/reacts.
16. United Nations Scientific Committee on Effects of Radiation (UNSCEAR) home page. www.unscear.org.
17. Energy Information Administration (EIA). (1998). Surplus defense inventories: A growing source of nuclear fuel for generating electricity. EIA-98-11. www.eia.doe.gov/neic/press/press96.html.
18. Finch, J. (2006). Miners and utilities at odds over uranium price forecasts. www.stockinterview.com/News/10022006/Platts1.html.
19. Kidd, S. (2006, June). Uranium: The heat continues. Mining News. www.mining-journal.com/wms-magazine/wms-Mag-Breaking-News.aspx? breaking-news-article-id=3139.
20. Trade Tech. (2007). Uranium as nuclear fuel. www.uranium.info/index.cfm? go=c.page&id=21.
21. World Nuclear Association. (2007, May). World uranium mining. Nuclear issues briefing paper 41. www.uic.com.au/nip41.htm.
22. Ansolabehere, S. (2007, June). Public attitudes toward America's energy options: Insights for nuclear energy. MIT-NES-TR-08. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
23. Barron, B. (2007, July 17). Comments made at National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners meeting, Division of Nuclear Waste Management. www.narucmeetings.org/Presentations/DiscussionOfNuclearWasteMgmt-DukeEnergy.pdf.
24. Bisconti Research, Inc. (2007, July-August). National survey of nuclear power plant communities. Conducted for the Nuclear Energy Institute. www.nei.org/filefolder/brief-summary-10-mile-radius-national-survey-07.doc.
25. Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2006, May-June). International Energy Annual, 2004. tonto.eia.doe.gov/reports/reportsD.asp?type=International.
26. Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP). (2007). Global Nuclear Energy Partnership statement of principles. www.gneppartnership.org/docs/GNEP-SOP.pdf.
27. International Security Advisory Board. (2008, April). Report on the proliferation implications of the global expansion of civilian nuclear power. www.state.gov/documents/organization/105587.pdf.
28. Kerr, P., & Pomper, M. (2005, March). Tackling the nuclear dilemma: An interview with IAEA Director-General Mohamed ElBaradei. Arms Control Association. www.armscontrol.org/act/2005-03/ElBaradei.asp.
29. Ling, K. (2007a, November 13). Nuclear waste: Pair of Senate hearings to examine future, legacy of waste. Environment and Energy Daily.
30. Ling, K. (2007b, November 15). GNEP losing support from all sides. Environment and Energy Daily.
31. National Research Council. Committee on Review of DOE's Nuclear Energy Research and Development Program. (2007). Review of DOE's Nuclear Energy Research and Development Program. www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record-id=11998.
32. U.S. Department of Energy. (2006, May). Report to Congress. Spent nuclear fuel recycling program plan. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
33. U.S. Department of Energy. (2006, July). Advanced fuel cycle initiative (AFCI) comparison report, FY 2006 update. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
34. World Nuclear Association. (2008, May 23). World nuclear power reactors 2006-08 and uranium requirements. www.world-nuclear.org/info/reactors.htm.
35. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). (2005, December). Nuclear power plant risk analysis and management for critical asset protection (RAMCAP): Trial applications summary report. No.1011767.mydocs.epri.com/docs/public/ 000000000001011767.pdf.
36. Garrick, B. J. (2004). Nuclear power: Risk analysis. In C. Cleveland (Ed.), Encyclopedia of energy (Vol. 4, pp. 421-31). Washington, DC: Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment.
37. McFarlane, H. (2006, May 24). Advanced reactor technologies. Paper presented at the meeting of the California Council on Science and Technology, Sacramento.
38. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). (1957, March). Theoretical possibilities and consequences of major accidents in large nuclear power plants. Report WASH-740. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
39. U.S. Department of Energy home page. www.energy.gov.
40. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission home page. www.nrc.gov.
41. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (1975, March). Reactor safety study: An assessment of accident risks in U.S. commercial nuclear power plants. Report WASH- 1400 (NUREG-75/014). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
42. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Division of Systems Research. Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. (1990). Severe accident risks: An assessment for five U.S. nuclear power plants. NUREG-1150. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
43. Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
44. Battist, L., Buchanan, J., Congel, F., Nelson, C., Nelson, M., Peterson, H., & Rosenstein, M. (1979). Population dose and health impact of the accident at the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station: Preliminary estimates for the period March 28 through April, 1979.
45. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission report. NUREG-0558. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
46. Bennett, B., Repacholi, M., & Carr, Z. (Eds.). (2006). Health effects of the Chernobyl accident and special health care programmes. New York: World Health Organization. www.who.int/ionizing-radiation/chernobyl/who-chernobyl- report-2006.pdf.
47. GPU Nuclear Corporation, Parsippany, NJ, home page. www.firstenergycorp. com.
48. Hore-Lacy, I. (2006). Light water graphite reactor (RBMK). In C. L. Cleveland (Ed.), Encyclopedia of earth. Washington, DC: Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment. www.eoearth.org/article/Light-water-graphite-reactor-(RBMK.
49. Kemeny, J., Babbitt, B., Haggerty, P., Lewis, C., Marks, P., Marrett, C., et al. (1979). Report of the President's Commission on the accident at Three Mile Island. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
50. Three Mile Island Public Health Fund. Three Mile Island Citizens' Monitoring Network home page. www.tmi-cmn.org/tmiphf.htm.
51. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). (n.d.) The Chernobyl accident: UNSCEAR's assessments of the radiation effects. www.unscear.org/unscear/en/chernobyl.html.
52. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. (1957, March). Theoretical possibilities and consequences of major accidents in large nuclear power Plants. WASH-740. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
53. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (n.d.) 10 CFR. 50.73 licensee event report system. www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part050/part050-0073. html.
54. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (1989, March). The status of recommendations of the President's Commission on the accident at Three Mile Island Nuclear Station. NUREG-1355. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
55. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Division of Systems Research. Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. (1990). Severe accident risks: An assessment for five U.S. nuclear power plants. NUREG-1150. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
56. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2004, March). Fact sheet on the Three Mile Island accident. www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/ 3mile-isle.html.
57. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2007). Fact sheet on the accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact- sheets/fschernobyl.html.
58. Walker, J. S. (2004). Three Mile Island: A nuclear crisis in historical perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
59. World Health Organization (WHO) home page. www.who.int/en.
60. National Energy Institute. (2007). Decommissioning of nuclear power plants. www.nei.org/keyissues/nuclearwastedisposal/factsheets/ decommissioningnuclearpowerplants.
61. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency. (2004). Strategy selection for the decommissioning of nuclear facilities: Seminar proceedings, Tarragona, Spain, 1-4 September 2003. Allan Duncan. Paris: OECD Publishing.
62. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) home page. www.nrc.gov.
63. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (n.d.) Decommissioning lessons learned. www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/decommissioning/lessons-learned.html.
64. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2007a). Fact sheet on decommissioning nuclear power plants. www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/ fact-sheets/decommissioning.html.
65. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2007b). Frequently asked questions about reactor decommissioning. www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/decommissioning/ faq.html.
66. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs. (2007c). Status of decommissioning program, 2006 annual report. NUREG-1814-, Rev.1. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
67. World Nuclear Organization (WNO). (2007). Decommissioning nuclear facilities. www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf19.html.
68. Council of State Governments Midwestern Office. (2005, August). Handbook of radioactive waste transportation. www.csgmidwest.org/About/MRMTP/ PublicInformation/realHandbook-inside.pdf.
69. Licensing Support Network home page. www.lsnnet.gov.
70. National Research Council. Committee on Transport of Radioactive Waste. (2006). Going the distance? The safe transport of nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record-id=11538.
71. U.S. Department of Energy. Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP). www.em.doe.gov/Transportation/TEPP-Home.aspx.
72. U.S. Department of Energy. Waste transportation, general information. www.energy.gov/safetyhealth/wastetransportation.htm.
73. U.S. Department of Energy. Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management. Transportation of spent nuclear fuel fact sheet. www.ocrwm.doe.gov/factsheets/doeymp0500.shtml.
74. U.S. Department of Energy. Office of Public Affairs. Spent nuclear fuel transportation. www.ocrwm.doe.gov/transport/pdf/snf-trans.pdf.
75. U.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Part 397: Transportation of hazardous materials; Driving and parking ruleswww.fmcsa.dot.gov/rules-regulations/administration/fmcsr/ fmcsrguidedetails.asp?rule-toc=766§ion-toc=766.
76. U.S. Department of Transportation. Research and Special Programs Administration. Federal regulations on labeling hazardous materials for transportation. ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?sid= 585c275ee19254ba07625d8c92fe925f&c=ecfr &tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title49/ 49cfrv2-02.tpl.
77. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Nuclear materials transportation, general information. www.nrc.gov/materials/transportation.html.
78. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Nuclear waste transportation routes: Highway and rail routes most likely to be used to transport high-level nuclear waste to Yucca Mountain, Nevada. www.state.nv.us/nucwaste/states/us.htm.
79. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Spent nuclear fuel transportation, general information. www.nrc.gov/waste/spent-fuel-transp.html.
80. U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board home page. www.nwtrb.gov.
81. The economic future of nuclear power: A study conducted at the University of Chicago. (2004, August). www.ne.doe.gov/np2010/reports/NuclIndustryStudy- Summary.pdf.
82. The future of nuclear power: An interdisciplinary Massachusetts Institute of Technology study. (2003). web.mit.edu/nuclearpower.
83. Joskow, P. L. (2006, December). The future of nuclear power in the United States: Economic and regulatory challenges. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies. Working paper 06-25. envirovaluation.org/index.php/2006/12/ 27/aei-brookings-joint-center-www-aei-brook-30.
84. Mazuzan, G. T., & Walker, J. S. (1985). Controlling the atom: The beginnings of nuclear regulation, 1946-1962. Berkeley: University of California Press.
85. Nivola, P. (2004). The political economy of nuclear energy in the United States. Policy brief 138. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute. www.brookings.edu/comm/policybriefs/pb138.htm.
86. Walker, J. S. (2000). A short history of nuclear regulation, 1946-1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
87. World Nuclear Association. World nuclear power reactors 2007-08 and uranium requirements. (Site also provides links to further information.) www.world-nuclear.org/info/reactors.html.
88. World Nuclear Association. (2007, June). The economics of nuclear power. Briefing paper 8. www.uic.com.au/nip08.htm.
89. American Council on Science and Health home page. www.acsh.org.
90. Centers for Disease Control. Food irradiation. www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dbmd/ diseaseinfo/foodirradiation.htm#whatis.
91. Health Physics Society home page. hps.org.
92. Idaho State University. Radiation Information Network's Food irradiation. www.physics.isu.edu/radinf/food.htm.
93. Irradiation. Federal, state, and international Web sites for food safety information. www.foodsafety.gov/~fsg/irradiat.html.
94. Society of Nuclear Medicine home page. www.snm.org.
95. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Food irradiation: A safe measure. www.fda.gov/opacom/catalog/irradbro.html.
96. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Industrial uses of nuclear materials. www.nrc.gov/materials/miau/industrial.html.
97. Alden, A. (n.d.). The Oklo natural nuclear reactor. geology.about.com/od/ geophysics/a/aaoklo. htm.
98. Atomic Heritage Foundation home page. www.atomicheritage.org.
99. Berlin, Robert E., & Stanton, C. C. (1989). Radioactive waste management. New York: Wiley.
100. Burns, M. (Ed.). (1988). Low-level radiation waste regulation: Science, politics, and fear. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers.
101. Cowan, G. A. (1976). A natural fission reactor. Scientific American, 235, 36.
102. Energy Information Administration (EIA) home page. www.eia.doe.gov.
103. Government Accountability Office. (2006, March). Yucca Mountain: Quality assurance at DOE's planned nuclear waste repository needs increased management attention. GAO- 06-313. www.gao.gov/new.items/d06313.pdf.
104. Greenberg, M., Lowrie, K., Burger, J., Powers, C., Gochfeld, M., & Mayer, H. (2007a). Nuclear waste and public worries: Public perceptions of the United States major nuclear weapons legacy sites. Human Ecology Review, 14(1), 1-12.
105. Greenberg, M., Lowrie, K., Burger, J., Powers, C., Gochfeld, M., & Mayer, H. (2007b). Preferences for alternative risk management policies at the United States major nuclear weapons legacy sites. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(2), 187-209.
106. Florig, H. K. (2006). An analysis of public interest group positions on radiation protection. Health Physics, 91(5), 508-13.
107. Holt, Mark. (2006). Civilian Nuclear Waste Disposal. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress. www.fas.org/spp/starwars/crs/92-059.htm.
108. Institute for Energy and Environmental Research. (2007, October 31). Comments of Dr. Arjun Makhijani . . . [from] hearing on "Examination of the Licensing Process for the Yucca Mountain Repository." www.ieer.org/ comments/waste/yucca071031.pdf.
109. Licensing Support Network home page. www.lsnnet.gov.
110. MacFarlane, A. M., & Ewing, R. C. (Eds.). (2006). Uncertainty underground: Yucca Mountain and the nation's high level nuclear waste. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
111. Macfarlane, H. (2006). The paradox of nuclear waste. Radwaste Solutions, September- October, 32-36.
112. National Research Council. Nuclear Radiation and Studies Board home page. dels.nas. edu/nrsb.
113. National Safety Council. Environmental Health Center. (1998). A reporter's guide to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). www.nsc.org/ehc/ guidebks/wippradi.html.
114. National Safety Council. Environmental Health Center. (2001). A reporter's guide to Yucca Mountain. downloads.nsc.org/PDF/yuccapdf.pdf.
115. Nuclear Information and Resource Service home page. www.nirs.org.
116. Nuclear Information and Resource Service. Radioactive Waste Project. Yucca Mountain, Nevada: Proposed high-level radioactive waste dump targeted at Native American lands. www.nirs.org/radwaste/yucca/yuccahome.htm.
117. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board home page. www.nrtrb.gov.
118. A prehistoric nuclear reactor. (1973, January). Chemistry, 24.
119. Reid, H. (2007). Yucca Mountain (and related press releases). reid.senate.gov/issues/yucca. cfm.
120. Smellie, J. (1995, March). The fossil nuclear reactors of Oklo, Gabon. Radwaste (special series on natural analogs), 21.
121. U.S. Department of Energy. Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management home page. www.ocrwm.doe.gov.
122. U.S. Department of Energy. Office of Environmental Management home page. www.em.doe.gov.
123. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation Protection programs home page. www.epa.gov/radiation/programs.html.
124. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission home page. www.nrc.gov.
125. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Advisory Committee on Nuclear Safeguards home page. www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/advisory/acrs.html.
126. Wilson, P. D. (2002). The nuclear fuel cycle: From ore to waste. New York: Oxford University Press.
127. Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors home page. www.crcpd.org.
128. Health Physics Society. Ask the Expert. hps.org/publicinformation/ asktheexperts.cfm.
129. Low-level waste management handbook series: Environmental monitoring for low-level waste disposal sites. (1990, February). DOE/LLW-131G, Vol. 1. Idaho Falls: EG&G Idaho.
130. McCutcheon, Chuck. (2003). Nuclear reactions: The politics of opening a radioactive waste disposal site. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
131. Ryan, M. T., Lee, M. P., & Larson, H. J. (2007). History and framework of commercial low-level radioactive waste management in the United States. ACNW white paper, NUREG-1853. Prepared by Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
132. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation protection, general information. www.epa.gov/radiation.
133. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs. (n.d.). State regulations and legislation. nrcstp. ornl.gov/rulemaking.html.
134. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Fact sheets on nuclear-related topics. www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/.
135. Burger, J. (2000). Contaminated Department of Energy facilities and ecosystems: Weighing the ecological risks. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, pt. A, 63, 383-95.
136. Burger, J. (2007). A framework for analysis of contamination on human and ecological receptors at DOE hazardous waste site buffer lands. Remediation, 17, 71-96.
137. Burger, J., Leschine, T., Greenberg, M., Karr, J., Gochfeld, M., & Powers, C. (2003). Shifting priorities at the Department of Energy's bomb factories: Protecting human and ecological health. Environmental Management, 31(2), 57-167.
138. Linthurst, R. A., Bourdeau, P., & Tardiff, R. G. (1995). Methods to assess the effects of chemicals on ecosystems. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
139. National Park Service. Biology resources. www.nature.nps.gov/biology.
140. U.S. Bureau of Land Management home page. www.blm.gov.
141. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management. (2002, February). Final environmental impact statement for a geologic repository for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada. DOE/EIS-0250. Available from www.ocrwm.doe.gov/documents/feis-a/index.htm.
142. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Division of Environmental Quality home page. www.fws.gov/contaminants.
143. U.S. Forest Service home page. www.fs.fed.us.
144. Whicker, F. W., Hinton, T. G., MacDonell, M. M., Pinder, J. E., & Habegger, L. J. (2004). Avoiding destructive remediation at DOE sites. Science, 303, 1615-16.
145. Carter, L. J. (1987). Nuclear imperatives and public trust: Dealing with radioactive waste. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
146. Greenberg, M., Lowrie, K., Burger, J., Powers, C., Gochfeld, M., & Mayer, H. (2007). Nuclear waste and public worries: Public perceptions of the United States major nuclear weapons legacy sites. Human Ecology Review, 14(1), 1-12.
147. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). (1999, October). From cleanup to stewardship. lts. apps.em.doe.gov/center/reports/pdf/doc130.pdf.
148. U.S. Department of Energy. Office of Legacy Management home page. www.lm.doe.gov.
149. Wiersma, G. B. (Ed.). (2004). Environmental monitoring. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
150. Australian Uranium Association. (2007, May). Mixed oxide fuel (MOX). Nuclear briefing paper 42. world-nuclear.org/info/inf29.html.
151. The Brookings Institution. (1998). 50 facts about U.S. nuclear weapons. www.brookings.edu/projects/archive/nucweapons/50.aspx.
152. Burns, A. (2007, July). Power punch. Site Selection. www.siteselection. com.
153. Duke Power home page. www.dukepower.com.
154. Federation of American Scientists. Garwin Archive. www.fas.org/RLG.
155. Macalister, T. (2008, March 3). Minister admits nuclear fuel plant produces almost nothing. The Guardian. www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/mar/03/ nuclear.energy.
156. National Nuclear Safety Administration home page. www.nnsa.doe.gov.
157. Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). (n.d.). Presidential actions: A brief history. Frontline series. www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/reaction/ readings/rossin1.html.
158. Schwartz, S. (1998). Atomic audit: The costs and consequences of U.S. nuclear weapons since 1940. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
159. Tennessee Valley Authority home page. www.tva.gov.
160. Union of Concerned Scientists home page. www.ucsusa.org.
161. U.S. Department of Energy home page. www.energy.gov.
162. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). (1996). Closing the circle on the splitting of the atom. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.
163. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). (2007, July 24). U.S. nuclear weapons strategy delivered to Congress. www.energy.gov/news/5275.htm.
164. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission home page. www.nrc.gov.
165. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (2007). Frequently asked questions about mixed oxide fuel. www.nrc.gov/materials/fuel-cycle-fac/mox/faq. html.
166. Walker, S. (2005). Shockwave: Countdown to Hiroshima. New York: Harper Perennial.
167. World Nuclear Association (WNA). (2008, March). Military warheads as a source of nuclear fuel. www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf13.html.
168. Zagaroli, L. (2006, March 8). Program to turn plutonium bombs into fuel hits snags. www.shns.com/shns/g-index2.cfm?action=detail&pk=NUCLEAR-03-08- 06.
169. Carnegie Mellon University. Center for Risk Perception and Communication home page. sds.hss.cmu.edu/risk.
170. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) home page. www.epri.com.
171. International Atomic Energy Agency home page. www.iaea.org.
172. Kelly, H. A. (2002, March 6). Testimony of Dr. Henry Kelly, President, Federation of American Scientists, before the Terrorist Nuclear Threat. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. www.tinyurl.com/ywu59a.
173. National Academy of Sciences. Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board home page. dels. nas.edu/nrsb.
174. Union of Concerned Scientists home page. www.ucsusa.org.
175. United Nations Scientific Committee on Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) home page. www.unscear.org.
176. University of Southern California. Center for Risk and Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events (CREATE) home page. www.usc.edu/dept/create.
177. U.S. General Accounting Office. (2003). Non-proliferation: U.S. international assistance efforts to control sealed radioactive sources needs strengthening. GAO-093-638.
178. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission home page. www.nrc.gov.
179. Arms Control Association. Back issues of Arms Control Today. Available at www.armscontrol.org/act.
180. Braun, C., & Chyba, C. (2004). Proliferation rings: New challenges to the nuclear nonproliferation regime. International Security, 29(2), 5.
181. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists home page. www.thebulletin.org.
182. Federation of American Scientists home page. www.fas.org.
183. International Atomic Energy Agency home page. www.iaea.org.
184. International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons home page. www.icanw.org.
185. International Physicians for Prevention of Nuclear War home page. www.ippnw.org.
186. National Academy of Sciences. (2005). Effects of nuclear earth-penetrator and other weapons. www.tinyurl.com/388xco.
187. National Academy of Sciences. Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board home page. dels. nas.edu/nrsb.
188. Nelson, R. (2001, January/February). Low-yield earth-penetrating nuclear weapons. Federation of American Scientists Public Interest Report. www.fas.org/faspir/2001/v54n1.
189. Nuclear Weapon Archives home page. www.nuclearweaponarchive.org.
190. Sokolski, H. (2001). Best of intentions: American's campaign against strategic weapons proliferation. Westport, CT: Praeger.
191. Union of Concerned Scientists home page. www.ucsusa.org.
192. United Nations Scientific Committee on Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) home page. www.unscear.org.
193. University of Southern California. Center for Risk and Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events (CREATE) home page. www.usc.edu/dept/create.
194. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission home page. www.nrc.gov.
195. Associated Press. (2007, January 30). Panel rejects responsibility for attacks. New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2007/01/30/washington/30brfs-reactor. html.
196. Bunn, M., & Bunn, G. (2002, Spring). Strengthening nuclear security against post-September 11 threats of theft and sabotage. Journal of Nuclear Materials Management, 1-12.
197. Chapin, D., Levenson, M., Pate, Z., & Rockwell, T. (2002). Nuclear power plants and their fuel as terrorist targets. Science, 297, 1997-99.
198. Jaczko, G. (2007, July 10). Perspective on preparedness for radiological terrorism. www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/speeches/2007/S-07- 036.html.
199. Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI). (2002, December), Deterring terrorism: Aircraft crash impact analyses demonstrate nuclear power plant's structural strength. Report prepared by the Electric Power Research Institute. www.nei.org/resourcesandstats/documentlibrary/safetyandsecurity/reports/ epriplantstructuralstudy.
200. Project on Government Oversight (POGO) home page. www.pogo.org.
201. Project on Government Oversight (POGO). (2002). Nuclear power plant security: Voices from inside the fences, September 12, 2002. www.pogo.org/p/environment/eo-020901-nukepower.html.
202. Project on Government Oversight (POGO). (2007). POGO urges NRC to approve new protections for power plant security officers. www.pogo.org/p/homeland/ha- 070301-nrc.html.
203. Schoch, D. (2001, September 22). Federal regulators reviewing security at nuclear power plants. Los Angeles Times. www.commondreams.org/headlines01/0922- 02.htm.
204. Union of Concerned Scientists home page. www.ucsusa.org.
205. Union of Concerned Scientists. (2007). Nuclear safety. www.ucsusa.org/nuclear-power/nuclear-power-risk/safety.
206. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) home page. www.nrc.gov.
207. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Committee on Science and Technology for Countering Terrorism. (2002). Making the nation safer: The role of science and technology in countering terrorism. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Available at www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record-id=10415.
208. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2007). Threat assessment. www.nrc.gov/security/threat.html.
209. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (2008, February 26). Statement on Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant. www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/ news/2008/08-037.html.
210. Wald, M. (2006a, November 9). Agency considers A-plants vulnerability. New York Times.
211. Wald, M. (2006b, December 25). Nuclear firms request rules to combat aerial attacks. New York Times.
212. Wald, M. (2007, April 25). U.S. takes step to address airliner attacks on reactors. New York Times.
213. Zuckerman, M. (2004, September 19). Stopping a nuclear nightmare. U.S. News and World Report.
214. International Atomic Energy Agency home page. www.iaea.org.
215. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2005). Multilateral approaches to the nuclear fuel cycle. www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/News/2005/ fuelcycle.html.
216. Nuclear Energy Agency home page. www.nea.fr.
217. America's Energy Future: Technology Opportunities, Risks, and Tradeoffs. An ongoing project by the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, and the National Academy of Sciences. (n.d.). www8.nationalacademies.org/cp/ projectview.aspx?key=48817.
218. Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems. (1990). Fuels to drive our future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
219. Committee on Nuclear and Alternative Energy Systems. (1982). Energy in transition, 1985-2010. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
220. Commoner, B. (1971). Closing the circle. New York: Knopf.
221. Energy Information Administration. (2005). World net geothermal, solar, wind, and wood and waste electric power generation. International Energy Annual. www.eia.doe.gov/pub/international/iealf/table28.xls.
222. Energy Information Administration. (2007). International Energy Annual. www.eia.doe.gov/iea/overview.html.
223. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Working Group III. (2005). Carbon dioxide capture and storage: Summary for Policy Makers. IPCC Special Report. www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/srccs/srccs- summaryforpolicymakers.pdf.
224. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Working Group I. (2007) Summary for policy makers. www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1- spm.pdf.
225. Meadows, D., Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. (1972). Limits to growth. New York: Club of Rome.
226. Meier, P. J. (2002). Life-cycle assessment of electricity generation systems and applications for climate change policy analysis. Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin. fti.neep.wisc.edu/pdf/fdm1181.pdf.
227. National Hydrogen Association home page. www.hydrogenassociation.org.
228. U.S. Department of Energy. Office of Science. (2007). DOE Mission Focus: Biofuels. www.genomicsgtl.energy.gov/biofuels/index.shtml.
229. U.S. Department of Energy. (2007, May 16). New Hampshire enacts a renewable requirement with solar set-asides. www.eere.energy.gov/states/news- detail.cfm/news-id=10781.
230. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality home page. www.ahrq.gov.
231. Ansolabehere, S. (2007, June). Public attitudes toward America's energy options: Insights for nuclear energy. MIT-NES-TR-08. mit.edu/canes/pdfs/nes-008. pdf.
232. Bisconti Research, Inc. (2005, May 5-9). U.S. public opinion about nuclear energy. Report for Nuclear Energy Institute, Washington, DC.
233. Bronfman, N., & Cifuentes, L. (2003). Risk perception in a developing country: The case of Chile. Risk Analysis, 23(6), 171-85.
234. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Radiation Emergencies home page. www.emergency.cdc.gov/radiation.
235. Cha, Y-J. (2000). Risk perception in Korea: A comparison with Japan and the United States. Journal of Risk Research, 3(4), 321-32.
236. Covello, V., & Sandman, P. (2001). Risk communication: Evolution and revolution. In A. Wolbarst (Ed.), Solutions to an environment in peril. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. www.psandman.com/articles/ covello.htm.
237. Fischer, G., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Nair, I., & Lave, L. (1991). What risks are people concerned about? Risk Analysis 11(2), 303-14.
238. Greenberg, M. (2008). Are nuclear facilities LULUS? What do United States data tell us?.
239. Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University and the Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation. Paper prepared for symposium honoring Frank Parker, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
240. Greenberg, M., Lowrie, K., Burger, J., Powers, C., Gochfeld, M., & Mayer, H. (2007). Nuclear waste and public worries: Public perceptions of the United States' major nuclear weapons legacy sites. Human Ecology Review, 14(1).
241. Leiter, A. (2008). The perils of a half-built bridge: Risk perception, shifting majorities, and the nuclear power debate. Ecology Law Quarterly, 35(1), pp. 31-72. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id=1001109.
242. Peter Sandman's Risk Communication Web Site. www.psandman.com.
243. Rosa, E. (2001). Public acceptance of nuclear power: Déjà vu all over again? Physics and Society, 30(2), 1-5.
244. Rosa, E. (2004). The future acceptability of nuclear power in the United States. Paris: Institute Français des Relations Internationales.
245. Sandman, P. (2007, March 22). Seesaw your way through ambivalence. CIDRAP Business Source. www.psandman.com/CIDRAP/CIDRAP8.htm.
246. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280-85.
247. Slovic, P., & Weber, E. (2002, April). Perception of risk posed by extreme events. Paper prepared for discussion at the conference Risk Management Strategies in an Uncertain World, Palisades, NY. www.ldeo.columbia.edu/chrr/ documents/meetings/roundtable/white-papers/slovic-wp.pdf.
248. Sunstein, C. R. (2005). Laws of fear: Beyond the precautionary principle. The Seeley Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
249. Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Misfearing: A reply U Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 274. Social Science Research Network. ssrn.com/abstract=880123.
250. U.S. Department of Energy home page. www.energy.gov.
251. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency home page. www.epa.gov.
252. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Public Affairs home page. www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/public-affairs.html.
253. Wahlberg, A., & Sjoberg, L. (2000). Risk perception and the media. Journal of Risk Research, 3(1), 31-50.
254. Williams, B., Greenberg, M., & Brown, S. (1999). Determinants of perceptions of trust among residents surrounding the Savannah River Site. Environment and Behavior, 31(3), 354-71.
255. Xie, X., Wang, M., & Xu, L. (2003). What risks are Chinese people concerned about? Risk Analysis, 23(4), 685-95.
256. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements home page. www.ncrp.org.
257. National Research Council. (1989). Improving risk communication. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Available at books.nap.edu/catalog. php?record-id=1189.
258. Rocky Mountain Peace and Justice Center home page. www.rmpjc.org.
259. Society for Risk Analysis home page. www.sra.org.
260. U.S. Department of Energy. Environmental Management, Site Specific Advisory Board home page. www.em.doe.gov/stakepages/ssababout.aspx.
261. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Radiation emergencies and event management. www.hhs.gov/disasters/emergency/manmadedisasters/radiation/ index.html.
262. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission home page. www.nrc.gov.
263. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2004). Effective risk communication. NUREG/BR-0308. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
264. West, B., Lewis, J., Greenberg, M., Sachsman, P., & Rogers, R. (2003). The reporter's environmental handbook (3rd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
265. American Nuclear Society. (1992). Controlled nuclear chain reaction: The first 50 years. La Grange Park, IL: American Nuclear Society.
266. Glasstone, S. (1979). Sourcebook on atomic energy (3rd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
267. Kruschke, E. R., & Jackson, B. M. (1990). Nuclear energy policy: A reference handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
268. Mazuan, G., & Walker, S. (1984). Controlling the atom: The beginnings of nuclear regulation, 1946-1962. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
269. Simpson, J. W. (1995). Nuclear power from underseas to outer space. La Grange Park, IL: American Nuclear Society.
270. Environmental Protection Agency. (2006, September 22). Laws we use. www.epa.gov/radiation/laws/laws-sum.html.
271. Kubiszewski, I. (2006). Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982. In C. L. Cleveland (Ed.), Encyclopedia of earth. Washington, DC: Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment.
272. U.S. Congress. Office of Technology Assessment. (1986, July). Transportation of hazardous materials. OTA-SET-304. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
273. U.S. Department of Energy. Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Science. Society and America's nuclear waste: The Nuclear Waste Policy Act, Unit 3; Teacher guide (2nd ed.). National Information Center, Curriculum Department. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
274. U.S. Department of Energy. (2007, September 7). About the project [Yucca Mountain]. www.ocrwm.doe.gov/ym-repository/about-project/index.shtml.
275. U.S. Department of Energy. (2007, September 7). Emplacement tunnels. www.ocrwm.doe.gov/ym-repository/studies/engdesign/tunneldesign.shtml.
276. U.S. Department of Energy. (2007, September 7). Transportation, aging, and disposal canister. www.ocrwm.doe.gov/ym-repository/studies/engdesign/ wastepackages.shtml.
277. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2007, February 15). Our governing legislation. www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/governing-laws.html#nwpa-1982.
278. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Radiation Event Medical Management. Dictionary of radiological terms. www.remm.nlm.gov/dictionary.htm.
279. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Full text glossary. www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/glossary/full-text.html.
280. U.S. Department of Energy. Energy Information Administration. Glossary. www.eia.doe.gov/glossary/index.html.
281. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Terms of environment: Glossary, abbreviations, and acronyms. www.epa.gov/OCEPAterms.
282. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Software for Environmental Awareness Comparative risk analysis. www.epa.gov/seahome/comprisk.html.
283. U.S. Department of Energy. Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Glossary of terms. www.wipp.energy.gov/library/rhwaste/rhsec6.htm.
284. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Fact sheet: Three Mile Island accident. www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/3mile-isle.pdf.
285. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Emergency planning zones. www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/emerg-preparedness/protect-public/planning-zones.html.
286. AJ Software & Multimedia. AtomicArchive.com. Glossary. www.atomicarchive.com/Glossary/Glossary1.shtml.
287. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation protection: A-Z index. www.epa.gov/radiation/atozindex.html.
288. U.S. Department of Energy. The Global Nuclear Energy Partnership. www.gnep.energy.gov/gnepProgram.html.
289. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Green building. www.epa.gov/greenbuilding.
290. International Atomic Energy Agency. The "Atoms for Peace" Agency. www.iaea.org/About/index.html.
291. International Commission on Radiological Protection, home page. www.icrp.org.
292. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Low specific activity. www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/glossary/low-specific-activity.html.
293. Defense Technical Information Center. Multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle. www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/doddict/data/m/03600.html.
294. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. The Nuclear Energy Agency. www.nea.fr/html/nea/flyeren.html.
295. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education home page. orise.orau.gov.
296. National Cancer Institute. Dictionary of cancer terms. www.cancer.gov/templates/db-alpha.aspx?expand=P.
297. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Public health and environmental radiation protection standards for Yucca Mountain, Nevada. www.epa.gov/ radiation/docs/yucca/RIN%202060-an15-final-40-cfr-197amendments.pdf.
298. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Frequently asked questions about potassium iodide. www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/emerg-preparedness/protect-public/ki- faq.html.
299. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. SECY-06-0185, August 23, 2006. www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/secys/2006/secy2006-0185/ 2006-0185scy.html
300. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Radioactive Waste Management Committee. www.nea.fr/html/rwm/rwmc.html.