메뉴 건너뛰기
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 472-474
Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials published in neurourology and urodynamics from 1993 to 2012
Author keywords

data quality; randomized controlled trial; research design
Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; MEDLINE; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RESEARCH SUBJECT; SCORING SYSTEM; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; URODYNAMICS; NEUROLOGY; STANDARDS; UROLOGY;
EID: 84902822252     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: 15206777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.22457     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (6)
References (7)
  • 1
    • 14844312907 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 4. Assessing heterogeneity of primary studies in systematic reviews and whether to combine their results
    • Hatala R, Keitz S, Wyer P, et al. Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 4. Assessing heterogeneity of primary studies in systematic reviews and whether to combine their results. CMAJ 2005; 172: 661-5.
    • (2005) CMAJ , vol.172 , pp. 661-665
    • Hatala, R.1    Keitz, S.2    Wyer, P.3
  • 2
    • 85047692188 scopus 로고
    • Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
    • Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, et al. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995; 273: 408-12.
    • (1995) JAMA , vol.273 , pp. 408-412
    • Schulz, K.F.1    Chalmers, I.2    Hayes, R.J.3
  • 3
    • 78650296834 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Randomized clinical trials presented at the World Congress of Endourology: How is the quality of reporting
    • Autorino R, Borges C, White MA, et al. Randomized clinical trials presented at the World Congress of Endourology: How is the quality of reporting ? J Endourol 2010; 24: 2067-73.
    • (2010) J Endourol , vol.24 , pp. 2067-2073
    • Autorino, R.1    Borges, C.2    White, M.A.3
  • 4
    • 0029914622 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary
    • Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary ? Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1-12.
    • (1996) Control Clin Trials , vol.17 , pp. 1-12
    • Jadad, A.R.1    Moore, R.A.2    Carroll, D.3
  • 5
    • 0037938708 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group
    • van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, et al. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28: 1290-9.
    • (2003) Spine (Phila Pa 1976) , vol.28 , pp. 1290-1299
    • Van Tulder, M.1    Furlan, A.2    Bombardier, C.3
  • 6
    • 33846846715 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature
    • Scales CD, Jr., Norris RD, Keitz SA, et al. A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature. J Urol 2007; 177: 1090-4.
    • (2007) J Urol , vol.177 , pp. 1090-1094
    • Scales, Jr.C.D.1    Norris, R.D.2    Keitz, S.A.3
  • 7
    • 15744365927 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals
    • Chan AW, Altman DG,. Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals. Lancet 2005; 365: 1159-62.
    • (2005) Lancet , vol.365 , pp. 1159-1162
    • Chan, A.W.1    Altman, D.G.2

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.