Metacognitive monitoring of attention performance and its influencing factors

Psychological Research

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 597-607

  Kessel, Ramona ^a   Gecht, Judith ^a   Forkmann, Thomas ^a   Drueke, Barbara ^a   Gauggel, Siegfried ^a   Mainz, Verena ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTENTION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHYSIOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84902820574     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0511-y     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bäumler, G. (1985). Farbe-Wort-Interferenztest (FWIT) nach J. R. Stroop. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
2. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
3. Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 170-177.
4. Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (2000). Updating knowledge about strategy effectiveness: a componential analysis of learning about strategy effectiveness from task experience. Psychology and Aging, 15(3), 462-474.
5. Durlak, J. A. (2009). How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34(9), 917-928.
6. Edwards, J. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58(1), 51-100.
7. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.
8. Fernandez-Duque, D., & Black, S. E. (2007). Metacognitive judgment and denial of deficit: evidence from frontotemporal dementia. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(5), 359-370.
9. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
10. Glenberg, A. M., Sanocki, T., Epstein, W., & Morris, C. (1987). Enhancing calibration of comprehension. Journal of Eperimental Psychology: General, 116(2), 119-136.
11. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando: Academic Press.
12. Holmbeck, G. N., Li, S. T., Schurman, J. V., Friedman, D., & Coakley, R. M. (2002). Collecting and managing multisource and multimethod data in studies of pediatric populations. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27(1), 5-18.
13. Irving, P. G., & Meyer, J. P. (1999). On using residual difference scores in the measurement of congruence: the case of met expectations research. Personnel Psychology, 52(1), 85-95.
14. Kelemen, W. L., Frost, P. J., & Weaver, C. A. (2000). Individual differences in metacognition: evidence against a general metacognitive ability. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 92-107.
15. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: a cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(4), 349-370.
16. Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 289-325). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Koriat, A., & Shitzer-Reichert, R. (2002). Metacognitive judgments and their accuracy. In P. Chambres, M. Izaute, & P.-J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition process, function and use (pp. 1-17). Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. Maki, R. H., Jonas, D., & Kallod, M. (1994). The relationship between comprehension and metacomprehension ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(1), 126-129.
19. Marshall, M. J., & Wilsoncroft, W. E. (1989). Time perception and the Stroop task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 1159-1162.
20. Mengelkamp, C., & Bannert, M. (2009). Judgements about knowledge, searching for factors that influence their validity. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(17), 163-190.
21. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: a theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 125-173). New York: Academic Press.
22. Perfect, T. J. (2002). When does eyewitness confidence predict performance? In T. J. Perfect & B. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 95-120). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Roderer, T., & Roebers, C. M. (2010). Explicit and implicit confidence judgments and developmental differences in metamemory: an eye-tracking approach. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 229-250.
24. Schraw, G. (1997). The effect of generalized metacognitive knowledge on test performance and confidence judgments. The Journal of Experimental Education, 65(2), 135-146.
25. Schraw, G. (2009). Measuring metacognitive judgments. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 415-429). New York: Routledge.
26. Schraw, G., Dunkle, M. E., Bendixen, L. D., & Roedel, T. D. (1995). Does a general monitoring skill exist? Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 433-444.
27. Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371.
28. Schraw, G., & Roedel, T. D. (1994). Test difficulty and judgment bias. Memory & Cognition, 22(1), 63-69.
29. Shaughnesssy, J. J., & Zechmeister, E. B. (1992). Memory monitoring accuracy as influenced by the distribution of retrieval practice. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30(2), 125-128.
30. Wells, A. (2000). Emotional disorders and metacognition: innovative cognitive therapy. Chichester: Wiley.
31. Yeung, N., & Summerfield, C. (2012). Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1594), 1310-1321.