Influence of surface topography on the human epithelial cell response to micropatterned substrates with convex and concave architectures

Journal of Biological Engineering

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Kim, Mee Hae ^a   Sawada, Yoshiko ^a   Taya, Masahito ^a   Kino oka, Masahiro ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cell cell interaction; Concave architecture; Convex architecture; Cytoskeletal formation; Human epithelial cells; Spatial cell distribution; Stereoscopic cell imaging

Indexed keywords

F ACTIN; UVOMORULIN; VINCULIN; ACTIN;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ADHERENT CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CONTACT; CELL CULTURE; CELL DENSITY; CELL FUNCTION; CELL GROWTH; CELL HETEROGENEITY; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL SURFACE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CYTOARCHITECTURE; EPITHELIUM CELL; FOCAL ADHESION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MICROTECHNOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRESS FIBER; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSKELETON; FILOPODIUM; HUMAN CELL CULTURE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN VITRO STUDY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TOPOGRAPHY;

EID: 84902733540     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17541611     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1754-1611-8-13     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang Y-L. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005, 310:1139-1143.
2. Wilkinson CDW, Riehle M, Wood MA, Gallagher J, Curtis ASG. The use of materials patterned on a nano- and micrometric scale in cellular engineering. Mater Sci Eng 2002, 19:263-269.
3. Nikkhah M, Edalat F, Manoucheri S, Khademhosseini A. Engineering microscale topographies to control the cell-substrate interface. Biomaterials 2012, 33:5230-5246.
4. le Digabel J, Ghibaudo M, Trichet L, Richert A, Ladoux B. Microfabricated substrates as a tool to study cell mechanotransduction. Med Biol Eng Comput 2010, 48:965-976.
5. Flemming RG, Murphy CJ, Abrams GA, Goodman SL, Nealey PF. Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. Biomaterials 1999, 20:573-588.
6. Brunette DM, Chehroudi B. The effects of the surface topography of micromachined titanium substrata on cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. J Biomech Eng 1999, 121:49-57.
7. Berry CC, Campbell G, Spadiccino A, Robertson M, Curtis ASG. The influence of microscale topography on fibroblast attachment and motility. Biomaterials 2004, 25:5781-5788.
8. Martínez E, Engel E, Planell JA, Samitier J. Effects of artificial micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behaviour. Ann Anat 2009, 191:126-135.
9. Karuri NW, Liliensiek S, Teixeira AI, Abrams G, Campbell S, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. Biological length scale topography enhances cell substratum adhesion of human corneal epithelial cells. J Cell Sci 2004, 117:3153-3164.
10. Liliensiek SJ, Campbell S, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. The scale of substratum topographic features modulates proliferation of corneal epithelial cells and corneal fibroblasts. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006, 79:185-192.
11. den Braber ET, de Ruijter JE, Smits HTJ, Ginsel LA, von Recum AF, Jansen JA. Quantitative analysis of fibroblast morphology on microgrooved surfaces with various groove and ridge dimensions. Biomaterials 1996, 17:2037-2044.
12. Mirzadeh H, Shokrolahi F, Daliri M. Effect of silicon rubber crosslink density on fibroblast cell behavior in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003, 67:727-732.
13. Ng CK, Yu KN. Proliferation of epithelial cells on PDMS substrates with micropillars fabricated with different curvature characteristics. Biointerphases 2012, 7:21.
14. Green AM, Jansen JA, van der Waerden JP, von Recum AF. Fibroblast response to microtextured silicone surfaces: texture orientation into or out of the surface. J Biomed Mater Res 1994, 28:647-653.
15. Kim MH, Tsubakino N, Kagita S, Taya M, Kino-oka M. Characterization of spatial cell distribution in multilayer sheet of human keratinocytes through a stereoscopic cell imaging system. J Biosci Bioeng 2011, 112:289-291.
16. Kino-oka M, Agatahama Y, Hata N, Taya M. Evaluation of growth potential of human epithelial cells by motion analysis of pairwise rotation under glucose-limited condition. Biochem Eng J 2004, 19:109-117.
17. Kim MH, Kino-oka M, Morinaga Y, Sawada Y, Kawase M, Yagi K, Taya M. Morphological regulation and aggregate formation of rabbit chondrocytes on dendrimer-immobilized surfaces with d-glucose display. J Biosci Bioeng 2009, 107:196-205.
18. Ghibaudo M, Trichet L, Le Digabel J, Richert A, Hersen P, Ladoux B. Substrate topography induces a crossover from 2D to 3D behavior in fibroblast migration. Biophys J 2009, 97:357-368.
19. Delon I, Brown NH. Integrins and the actin cytoskeleton. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2007, 19:43-50.
20. Frey MT, Tsai IY, Russell TP, Hanks SK, Wang YL. Cellular responses to substrate topography: role of myosin II and focal adhesion kinase. Biophys J 2006, 90:3774-3782.
21. Saez A, Ghibaudo M, Buguin A, Silberzan P, Ladoux B. Rigidity-driven growth and migration of epithelial cells on microstructured anisotropic substrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:8281-8286.
22. Galbraith CG, Yamada KM, Sheetz MP. The relationship between force and focal complex development. J Cell Biol 2002, 159:695-705.
23. Kaibuchi K, Kuroda S, Fukata M, Nakagawa M. Regulation of cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion by the Rho family GTPases. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1999, 11:591-596.