Carbon stocks and climate change: Management implications in Northern Arizona Ponderosa Pine forests

Forests

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 620-642

  Bagdon, Benjamin ^a   Huang, Ching Hsun ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change and elevation; Climate forest vegetation simulator; Climate driven forest mortality; Forest carbon stores; Forest management and climate change; Representative concentration pathways

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC RADIATION; CARBON; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE MODELS; MANAGEMENT;

CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIOS; CLIMATE-DRIVEN FOREST MORTALITY; ELEVATIONAL GRADIENTS; FOREST CARBONS; FOREST VEGETATION SIMULATOR; MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS; PONDEROSA PINE FOREST; REPRESENTATIVE CONCENTRATION PATHWAYS;

FORESTRY;

CARBON SINK; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ELEVATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FOREST RESOURCE; MORTALITY; RADIATIVE FORCING; STAND STRUCTURE; THINNING; VEGETATION COVER;

FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; PLANTS;

ARIZONA; UNITED STATES;

PINUS PONDEROSA;

EID: 84902689009     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19994907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/f5040620     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Breshears, D.D. Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2005, 102, 15144-15148.
2. Kelly, A.E.; Goulden, M.L. Rapid shifts in plant distribution with recent climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008, 105, 11823-11826.
3. Rehfeldt, G.E.; Ferguson, D.E.; Crookston, N.L. Aspen, climate, and sudden decline in western USA. For. Ecol. Manag. 2009, 258, 2353-2364.
4. Williams, A.P.; Allen, C.D.; Macalady, A.K.; Griffin, D.; Woodhouse, C.A.; Meko, D.M.; Swetnam, T.W.; Rauscher, S.A.; Seager, R.; Grissino-Mayer, H.D.; et al. Temperature as a potent driver of regional forest drought stress and tree mortality. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2012, 3, 292-298.
5. Brusca, R.C.; Wiens, J.F.; Meyer, W.M.; Eble, J.; Franklin, K.; Overpeck, J.T.; Moore, W. Dramatic response to climate change in the Southwest: Robert Whittaker's 1963 Arizona Mountain plant transect revisited. Ecol. Evol. 2013, 3, 3307-3319.
6. Swetnam, T.W.; Betancourt, J.L. Mesoscale disturbance and ecological response to decadal climatic variability in the American Southwest. J. Clim. 1997, 11, 3128-3147.
7. Christensen, J.H.; Hewitson, B.; Busuioc, A.; Chen, A.; Gao, X.; Held, I.; Jones, R.; Kolli, R.K.; Kwon, W.T.; Laprise, R.; et al. Regional Climate Projections. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., Miller, H.L.; Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 847-940.
8. Grissino-Mayer, H.D.; Swetnam, T.W. Century-scale climate forcing of fire regimes in the American Southwest. Holocene 2000, 10, 213-229.
9. Westerling, A.L.; Hidalgo, H.G.; Cayan, D.R.; Swetnam, T.W. Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity. Science 2006, 313, 940-943.
10. Bentz, B.J.; Régnière, J.; Fettig, C.J.; Hansen, E.M.; Hayes, J.L.; Hicke, J.A.; Kelsey, R.G.; Negron, J.F.; Seybold, S.J. Climate change and bark beetles of the western United States and Canada: direct and indirect effects. Biosci. 2010, 60, 602-613.
11. Van Mantgem, P.J.; Stephenson, N.L.; Byrne, J.C.; Daniels, L.D.; Franklin, J.F.; Fulé, P.Z.; Harmon, M.E.; Larson, A.J.; Smith, J.M.; Taylor, A.H.; Veblen, T.T. Widespread increase in tree mortality rates in the Western United States. Science 2009, 323, 521-524.
12. Breshears, D.D.; Allen, C.D. The importance of rapid, disturbance-induced losses in carbon management and sequestration. Glob. Ecol. Biogeog. 2002, 11, 1-5.
13. Schubert, G.H. Silviculture of Southwestern Ponderosa pine: The Status of our Knowledge; General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-123; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: Fort Collins, CO, USA, 1974; p. 7.
14. Merriam, C.H. Results of a Biological Survey on the San Francisco Mountain Region and Desert of the Little Colorado, Arizona; North. Am. Fauna No. 3; U.S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1890; pp. 7-13.
15. Ogle, K.; Whitham, T.G.; Cobb, N.S. Tree-ring variation in pinyon pine predicts likelihood of death following severe drought. Ecology 2000, 81, 3237-3243.
16. Nevo, E. Evolution of genome-phenome diversity under environmental stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2001, 98, 6233-6240.
17. Rehfeldt, G.E. A Spline Model of Climate for the Western United States; General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-165; Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: Fort Collins, CO, USA, 2006; pp. 1-20.
18. Gray, S.T.; Betancourt, J.L.; Jackson, S.T.; Eddy, R.G. Role of multidecadal climate variability in a range extension of pinyon pine. Ecology 2006, 87, 1124-1130.
19. McDowell, N.; Pockman, W.T.; Allen, C.D.; Breshears, D.D.; Cobb, N.; Kolb, T.; Plaut, J.; Sperry, J.; West, A.; Williams, D.G.; Yepez, E.A. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: Why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol. 2008, 178, 719-739.
20. Gitlin, A.R.; Sthultz, C.M.; Bowker, M.A.; Stumpf, S.; Paxton, K.L.; Kennedy, K.; Munoz, A.; Bailey, J.K.; Whitham, T.G. Mortality gradients within and among dominant plant populations as barometers of ecosystem change during extreme drought. Cons. Biol. 2006, 5, 1477-1486.
21. Bowker, M.A.; Munoz, A.; Martinez, T.; Lau, M.K. Rare drought-induced mortality of juniper is enhanced by edaphic stressors and influenced by stand density. J. Arid Environ. 2012, 76, 9-16.
22. NASA Earth Observatory. Earth's Energy Balance. Available online: http://earthobservatory. nasa.gov/Features/EnergyBalance/page4.php (accessed on 16 December 2013).
23. Le Treut, H.; Somerville, R.; Cubasch, U.; Ding, Y.; Mauritzen, C.; Mokssit, A.; Peterson, T.; Prather, M. Historical Overview of Climate Change. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., Miller, H.L., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 93-127.
24. Meehl, G.A.; Stocker, T.F.; Collins, W.D.; Friedlingstein, P.; Gaye, A.T.; Gregory, J.M.; Kitoh, A.; Knutti, R.; Murphy, J.M.; Noda, A.; et al. Climate Projections. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., Miller, H.L., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 747-846.
25. Allen, C.D.; Breshears, D.D. Drought induced shift of a forest-woodland ecotones: Rapid landscape response to climate variation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1998, 95, 14389-14842.
26. Beaumont, L.J.; Hughes, L.; Poulsen, M. Predicting species distributions: Use of climatic parameters in Bioclim and its impact on predictions of species' current and future distributions. Ecol. Model. 2005, 186, 250-269.
27. Rehfeldt, G.E.; Crookston, N.L.; Warwell, M.V.; Evans, J.S. Empirical analyses of plant-climate relationships for the Western United-States. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2006, 167, 1123-1150.
28. Cutler, D.R.; Edwards, T.C. Jr.; Beard, K.H.; Cutler, A.; Hess, K.T.; Gibson, J.; Lawler, J.J. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology. 2007, 88, 2783-2792.
29. Crimmins, S.M.; Dobrowski, S.Z.; Greenberg, J.A.; Abatzoglou, J.T.; Mynsberge, A.R. Changes in climatic water balance drive downhill shifts in plant species' optimum elevations. Science. 2011, 331, 324-326.
30. Laughlin, D.C.; Fulé, P.Z.; Huffman, D.W.; Crouse, J.; Laliberté, E. Climatic constraints on trait-based forest assembly. J. Ecol. 2011, 99, 1489-1499.
31. Covington, W.W.; Moore, M.M. Post-settlement changes in natural fire regimes and forest structure: Ecological restoration of old-growth ponderosa pine forests. J. Sust. For. 1994, 2, 153-181.
32. Covington, W.W.; Fulé, P.Z.; Moore, M.M.; Hart, S.C.; Kolb, T.E.; Mast, J.N.; Sackett, S.S.; Wagner, M.R. Restoring ecosystem health in ponderosa pine forests of the southwest. J. For. 1997, 95, 23-29.
33. Reynolds, R.T.; Sánchez-Meador, A.J.; Youzt, J.A.; Nicolet, T.; Matonis, M.S.; Jackson, P.L.; DeLorenzo, D.G.; Graves, A.D. Restoring Composition and Structure in Southwestern Frequent-Fire Forests: A Science-Based Framework for Improving Ecosystem Resiliency; General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-310; Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: Fort Collins, CO, USA, 2013; p. 76.
34. Finkral, A.J.; Evans, A.M. The effects of a thinning treatment on carbon stocks in a northern Arizona ponderosa pine forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 255, 2743-2750.
35. Wiedinmyer, C.; Hurteau, M.D. Prescribed fire as a means of reducing forest carbon emissions in the Western United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 1926-1932.
36. Hurteau, M.D.; Koch, G.W.; Hungate, B.A. Carbon protection and fire risk reduction: Toward a full accounting of forest carbon offsets. Fron. Ecol. Envir. 2008, 6, 493-498.
37. Vegh, T.; Huang, C.H.; Finkral, A.J. Carbon credit possibilities and economic implications of fuel reduction treatements. West. J. Appl. For. 2013, 28, 57-65.
38. Sorensen, C.; Finkral, A.J.; Kolb, T.E.; Huang, C.H. Short-and long-term effects of thinning and prescribed fire on carbon stocks in ponderosa pine stands in Northern Arizona. For. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 261, 460-472.
39. Huang, C.H.; Finkral, A.; Sorensen, C.; Kolb, T. Toward full economic valuation of forest fuels-reduction treatments. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 130, 221-231.
40. Mason, C.L.; Lippke, B.R.; Zobrist, K.W.; Blaxton, T.D., Jr.; Ceder, K.R.; Comnick, J.M.; McCarter, J.B.; Rogers, H.K. Investments in fuel removals to avoid forest fires result in substantial benefits. J. For. 2006, 104, 27-31.
41. Snider, G.; Daugherty, P.; Wood, D. Irrationality of continued fire suppression: an avoided cost analysis of fire hazard reduction treatments versus no treatment. J. For. 2006, 104, 431-437.
42. Fulé, P.Z. Does it make sense to restore wildland fire in changing climate? Restor. Ecol. 2008, 16, 526-531.
43. Crookston, N.L.; Rehfeldt, G.E.; Dixon, G.E.; Weiskittel, A.R. Addressing climate change in the forest vegetation simulator to assess impacts on landscape forest dynamics. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 260, 1198-1211.
44. United States Department of Agriculture Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program. Available online: http://www.fs.fed.us/restoration/CFLRP/(accessed on 16 December 2013).
45. National Climatic Data Center. Annual Climatological Summary: 1979-2009, Flagstaff Pulliam Airport, AZ. Dataset available upon request to corresponding author.
46. Torching Index (TI) is the 20 foot wind speed necessary, in miles-per-hour, for a surface fire to ignite a crown fire [46]. Torching index is calculated in the Fire and Fuels Extension to the Forest Vegetation Simulator (FFE-FVS).
47. Van Vuuren, D.P.; Edmonds, J.; Kainuma, M.; Riahi, K.; Thomson, A.; Hibbard, K.; Hurtt, G.C.; Kram, T.; Krey, V.; Lamarque, J.; et al. The representative concentration pathways: An overview. Clim. Chang. 2011, 109, 5-31.
48. Crookston, N.L. Climate-FVS Version 2: Content, User's Guide, Applications, and Behavior. (Review Draft), 2013. Available online: http://www.fs.fed.us/fmsc/ftp/fvs/docs/gtr/ClimateFVS_ UsersGuide.pdf. (accessed on 11 December 2013).
49. Dixon, G.E. Essential FVS: A User's Guide to the Forest Vegetation Simulator; Internal Report, comp. (Revised: November 19, 2013); Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Management Service Center: Fort Collins, CO, USA, 2002; p. 226.
50. Daniels, A.E.; Morrison, J.F.; Joyce, L.A.; Crookston, N.L.; Chen, S.C.; McNulty, S.G. Climate Projections FAQ; General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-277WWW; Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: Fort Collins, CO, USA, 2012; p. 32.
51. Breiman, L. Random forests. Machine Learn. 2001, 45, 5-32.
52. Liaw, A.; Wiener, M. Classification and regression by random forest. R News 2002, 2, 18-22.
53. Rebain, S.A. The Fire and Fuels Extension to the Forest Vegetation Simulator: Updated Model Documentation; Internal Report; Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: Fort Collins, CO, USA, 2013; p. 408.
54. Veblen, T.T.; Kitzberger, T.; Donnegan, J. Climatic and human influences on fire regimes in ponderosa pine forests in the Colorado Front Range. Ecol. Appl. 2000, 10, 1178-1195.
55. Shorter fire-return intervals in lower-elevation ponderosa pine stands are characteristic of the historic fire regimes, i.e., pre-European settlement, before widespread fire-suppression policies were implemented in the Western United States.
56. McCusker, N. Four-Forest Restoration Initiative Coconino and Kaibab National Forests Silviculture Specialist Report; US Forest Service: Flagstaff, AZ, USA, 2013. Available online: https://fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5413017.pdf (accessed on 16 December 2013).
57. U.S. Forest Service Four Forest Restoration Initiative. Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Four-Forest Restoration Initiative; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southwest Region: Fort Collins, CO, USA, February 2013; p. 716. Available online: http://www.4fri.org/pdfs/documents/NEPA/draft-eis-feb2013.pdf (accessed on 12 December 2013).
58. Four Forest Restoration Initiative Stakeholders Group. Old-Growth Protection and Large Tree Retention Strategy. Comp; Four Forest Restoration Initiative: Flagstaff, AZ, USA, 2011, (revised August 2012). Available online: http://www.4fri.org/pdfs/documents/collaboration/old_growth_ protection-revised080812.pdf (accessed on 30 November 2013).
59. Fulé, P.Z.; Covington, W.W.; Moore, M.M. Determining reference conditions for ecosystem management of southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Ecol. Appl. 1997, 7, 895-908.
60. Fulé, P.Z.; Crouse, J.E.; Roccaforte, J.P.; Kalies, E.L. Do thinning and/or burning treatments in western USA ponderosa or Jeffrey pine-dominated forests help restore natural fire behavior? For. Ecol. Manag. 2012, 269, 68-81.
61. DeGomez, T. Guidelines for thinning ponderosa pine for improved forest health and fire prevention. In Cooperative Extension: The University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences; Publication AZ: Tucson, AZ, USA, 1397. Available online: http://cals.arizona.edu/pubs/natresources/az1397.pdf (accessed on 24 October 2013).
62. Bailey, J.D.; Covington, W.W. Evaluating ponderosa pine regeneration rates following ecological restoration treatments in northern Arizona, USA. For. Ecol. Manag. 2002, 155, 271-278.
63. The FVS has calibrated its tree-growth equations using data primarily collected during the 20th Century [50]. The climate in North America during this period of time was relatively constant, up until the 1990s when increases in MAT became more apparent [7]. Therefore, running simulations into the 21st Century without the Climate Extension to the FVS outputs data derived from equations that assume tree-growth will not be affected by climate change.
64. Crown competition factor is a measure of area occupied by each tree's canopy [50]. A tree's crown competition factor is the percentage of an acre the tree's crown would occupy if that tree were to be grown in open conditions. A crown competition factor of 100 means that all tree-crowns would just touch. This metric is a measure of stand density and competition between trees.
65. Hurteau, M.; North, M. Fuel treatment effects on tree-based forest carbon storage and emissions under modeled wildfire scenarios. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7, 409-414.
66. 2 fertilization effect? New Phytol. 2006, 171, 379-390.
67. McDowell, N.; Allen, C.D.; Marshall, L. Growth, carbon-isotope discrimination, and drought-associated mortality across a Pinus ponderosa elevational transect. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2010, 16, 399-415.
68. Hurteau, M.D.; Stoddard, M.T.; Fulé, P.Z. The carbon costs of mitigating high-severity wildfire in southwestern ponderosa pine. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2011, 17, 1516-1521.
69. Keith, H.; Mackey, B.G.; Lindenmayer, D.B. Re-evaluation of forest biomass carbon stocks and lessons from the world's most carbon-dense forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2009, 11635-11640.
70. Smith, D.M.; Larson, B.C.; Kelty, M.J.; Ashton, P.M.S. Chapter 1: Silviculture and its place in forestry. In The Practice of Silviculture: Applied Ecology, 9th ed.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1996.