Conservation and improvements in water resource management: A global challenge

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 77, Issue , 2014, Pages 1-9

  Bagatin, Roberto ^a   Klemeš, Jiři Jaromír ^b   Reverberi, Andrea Pietro ^c   Huisingh, Donald ^d  

^a ENI S P A   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PANNONIA   (Hungary)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Contaminated sites; Global water challenges; Improved water use efficiency; Responsible water resource management; Water pinch analysis; Water sustainability

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; REMEDIATION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WATER CONSERVATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTION;

CONTAMINATED SITES; GLOBAL WATER CHALLENGES; WATER PINCH ANALYSIS; WATER SUSTAINABILITY; WATER USE EFFICIENCY; WATERRESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

WATER POLLUTION CONTROL;

EID: 84902679572     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.027     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. F.R. Ahmadun, A. Pendashteh, L.C. Abdullah, D.R.A. Biak, S.S. Madaeni, and Z.Z. Abidin Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment J. Hazard. Mater. 170 2-3 2009 530 551
2. R. Baciocchi, C. Ciotti, G. Cleriti, I. Innocenti, and A. Nardella Design of in situ Fenton oxidation based on the integration of experimental and numerical modelling J. Adv. Oxid. Technol. 13 2 2010 153 216
3. R. Baciocchi, L. D'Aprile, I. Innocenti, F. Massetti, and I. Verginelli Development of technical guidelines for the application of in-situ chemical oxidation to groundwater remediation J. Clean. Prod. 77 2014 47 55
4. E.S. Bernhardt, L.E. Band, C.J. Walsh, and P.E. Berke Understanding, managing, and minimizing urban impacts on surface water nitrogen loading Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1134 2008 61 96
5. A. Careghini, S. Saponaro, and E. Sezenna Biobarriers for groundwater treatment: a review Water Sci. Technol. 67 3 2013 453 468
6. R.O. Carey, and K.W. Migliaccio Contribution of wastewater treatment plant effluents to nutrient dynamics in aquatic systems: a review Environ. Manag. 44 2 2009 205 217
7. N.D. Chaturvedi, and S. Bandyopadhyay Simultaneous targeting for the minimum water requirement and the maximum production in a batch process J. Clean. Prod. 77 2014 105 115
8. I.M.L. Chew, R.R. Tan, D.C.Y. Foo, and A.S.F. Chiu Game theory approach to the analysis of inter-plant water integration in an eco-industrial park J. Clean. Prod. 17 18 2009 1611 1619
9. M. Cobas, L. Ferreira, T. Tavares, M.A. Sanromán, and M. Pazos Development of permeable reactive biobarrier for the removal of PAHs by Trichoderma longibrachiatum Chemosphere 91 2013 711 716
10. P. Daskalaki, and K. Voudoris Groundwater quality of porous aquifers in Greece: a synoptic review Environ. Geol. 54 3 2008 505 513
11. W.N. Davis, R.G. Bramblett, A.V. Zale, and C.L. Endicott A review of the potential effects of coal bed natural gas development activities on fish assemblages of the Powder River geologic basin Rev. Fish. Sci. 17 3 2009 402 422
12. A. Di Molfetta, and R. Sethi Clamshell excavation of a permeable reactive barrier Environ. Geol. 50 3 2006 361 369
13. EPA A Citizen's Guide to Permeable Reactive Barriers 2011 US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Washington (DC) www.epa.gov (accessed 16.02.11.)
14. B. Fabiano, and F. Currò From a survey on accidents in the downstream oil industry to the development of a detailed near-miss reporting system Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 90 5 2012 357 367
15. B. Fabiano, A.P. Reverberi, A. Del Borghi, and V.G. Dovì Biodiesel production via transesterification: process safety insights from kinetic modeling Theor. Found. Chem. Eng. 46 6 2012 673 680
16. K.Y. Foo, and B.H. Hameed An overview of landfill leachate treatment via activated carbon adsorption process J. Hazard. Mater. 171 1-3 2009 54 60
17. Schlumberger Fracturing 2008 Available from: www.slb.com/services/ stimulation/reservoir.aspx (accessed 12.03.13.)
18. B.C. Gordalla, U. Ewers, and F.H. Frimmel Hydraulic fracturing: a toxicological threat for groundwater and drinking water? Environ. Earth Sci. 70 2013 3875 3893
19. R.S. Greenberg, T. Andrews, P.K. Kakarla, and R.J. Watts In-situ Fenton-like oxidation of volatile organics: laboratory, pilot and full-scale demonstrations Remediat. J. 8 2 1998 29 42
20. T.J.T.C. Grotenhuis, and H.H.H.M. Rijnaarts In-situ remediation technologies F.A. Swartjes, Dealing with Contaminated Sites 2011 Springer Science and Business Media New York, NY
21. I. Hamawand, T. Yusaf, and S.G. Hamawand Coal seam gas and associated water: a review paper Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 22 2013 550 560
22. A.D. Henderson, and A.H. Demond Long-term performance of zero-valent iron permeable reactive barriers: a critical review Environ. Eng. Sci. 24 4 2007 401 423
23. N. Ibrić, E. Ahmetović, and Z. Kravanja Two-step mathematical programming synthesis of pinched and threshold heat-integrated water networks J. Clean. Prod. 77 2014 116 139
24. P.K. Kakarla, T. Andrews, R.S. Geenberg, and D.S. Zervas Modified Fenton's processes for effective in-situ chemical oxidation-Laboratory and field evaluation Remediat. J. 12 4 2002 23 36
25. C.S. Khor, B. Chachuat, and N. Shah Fixed-flowrate total water network synthesis under uncertainty with risk management J. Clean. Prod. 77 2014 79 93
26. J.J. Klemeš Industrial water recycle/reuse Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 1 3 2012 238 245
27. J.J. Klemeš, and D. Huisingh Economic use of renewable resources, LCA, cleaner batch processes and minimising emissions and wastewater J. Clean. Prod. 16 2 2008 159 163
28. J.J. Klemeš, P.S. Varbanov, and Z. Kravanja Recent developments in process integration Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 91 10 2013 2037 2053
29. S.J. Lee, S.R. Wan Alwi, J.S. Lim, and Z.A. Manan Minimum water network design for fixed schedule and cyclic operation batch processes with minimum storage capacity and inter-connections J. Clean. Prod. 77 2014 65 78
30. P.Y. Liew, S.R. Wan Alwi, J.S. Lim, P.S. Varbanov, J.J. Klemeš, and Z.A. Manan Total site heat integration incorporating the water sensible heat J. Clean. Prod. 77 2014 94 104
31. 4 Ground Water Monit. R22 1 2002 106 115
32. M. Mahony Toxic Fracking Fluids Revealed in Congressional Report 2011 Available from: www.smartplanet.com/blog/intelligent-energy/toxic-fracking- fluid-revealed-in-congressional-report/ (accessed 17.04.11.)
33. F. Manenti, and Z. Ravaghi-Ardebili Dynamic simulation of concentrating solar power plant and two-tanks direct thermal energy storage Energy 55 2013 89 97
34. M. Maretto, F. Blanchi, R. Vignola, S. Canepari, M. Baric, R. Iazzoni, M. Tagliabue, and M. Petrangeli Papini Microporous and mesoporous materials for the treatment of wastewater produced by petrochemical activities J. Clean. Prod. 77 2014 22 34
35. L.D. Nghiem, T. Ren, N. Aziz, I. Porter, and G. Regmi Treatment of coal seam gas produced water for beneficial use in Australia: a review of best practices Desalination Water Treat. 32 1-3 2011 316 323
36. E. Palazzi, and B. Fabiano Analytical modelling of hydrocarbon pool fires: conservative evaluation of flame temperature and thermal power Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 90 2 2012 121 128
37. R.M. Powell, D.W. Blowes, R.W. Gillham, D. Schulz, T. Sivavec, R.W. Puls, J.L. Vogan, P.D. Powell, and R. Landis Permeable Reactive Barrier Technologies for Contaminant Remediation 1998 United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA/600/R-98/125. Available from: www.clu-in.org/download/rtdf/prb/reactbar.pdf
38. Produced Water Management Information System - Introduction to Produced Water 2011 US Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) Pittsburg, PA Available from: www.netl.doe.gov (accessed 16.02.11.)
39. D.L. Shaffer, L.H. Arias Chavez, M. Ben-Sasson, S. Romero-Vargas Castrillon, N.Y. Yip, and M. Elimelech Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water: drivers, technologies, and future directions Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 17 2013 9569 9583
40. A.M. Shoaib, S.M. Aly, M.E. Awad, D.C.Y. Foo, and M.M. El-Halwagi A hierarchical approach for the synthesis of batch water network Comput. Chem. Eng. 32 2008 530 539
41. G. Statyukha, O. Kvitka, I. Dzhygyrey, and J. Jeżowski A simple sequential approach for designing industrial wastewater treatment networks J. Clean. Prod. 16 2 2008 215 224
42. W.-N. Su, Q.-H. Li, Z.-Y. Liu, and C.-H. Pan A new design method for water-using network of multiple contaminants with single internal water main J. Clean. Prod. 29-30 2012 38 45
43. C. Sullivan, M. Tyrer, C.R. Cheeseman, and N.J.D. Graham Disposal of water treatment wastes containing arsenic - a review Sci. Total Environ. 408 8 2010 1770 1778
44. M. Tagliabue, A.P. Reverberi, and R. Bagatin Boron removal from water: needs, challenges and perspectives J. Clean. Prod. 77 2014 56 64
45. T. Tosco, M. Petrangeli Papini, C. Cruz Viggi, and R. Sethi Nanoscale zerovalent iron particles for groundwater remediation: a review J. Clean. Prod. 77 2014 10 21
46. A.T.K. Tran, Y. Zhang, D. De Corte, J.-B. Hannes, W. Ye, P. Mondal, N. Jullok, B. Meesschaert, L. Pinoy, and B. Van der Bruggen P-recovery as calcium phosphate from wastewater using an integrated selectrodialysis-crystallisation process J. Clean. Prod. 77 2014 140 151
47. UNESCO, 2014. www.unesco.org/water (accessed 24.02.14.).
48. T.I.R. Utvik Chemical characterisation of produced water from off-shore oil production platforms in the North Sea Chemosphere 39 15 1999 2593 2606
49. M. Vocciante, M. Trofa, P. Rodríguez-Estupiñán, L. Giraldo, T. D'Auria, J.C. Moreno-Piraján, and A. Erto A rigorous procedure for the design of adsorption units for the removal of cadmium and nickel from process wastewaters J. Clean. Prod. 77 2014 35 46
50. Water Efficiency: Industrial Water Users 2013 New Hampshire Department of Environmental Sciences WD-DWGB-26-7 www.des.nh.gov/organization/commissioner/ pip/factsheets/dwgb/documents/dwgb-26-7.pdf (accessed march 2013)
51. Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality. Boron in Drinking Water,2003, http://www.who.int/water-%20sanitation-health/dwq/boron.pdf.