Isochrony reconsidered. Objectifying relations between rhythm measures and speech tempo

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Speech Prosody, SP 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 419-422

  Russo, Michela ^a   Barry, William J ^a  

^a University of Paris 8 UMR 7023 C N R S France and University of Saarbrücken   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ISOCHRONY; REPRESENTATIVITY; SPEECH MATERIALS; STRUCTURAL BASIS; SYLLABLE STRUCTURES;

SPEECH;

EID: 84902659097     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Barry W. J.; Russo, M., 2003. Measuring rhythm. Is it separable from speech rate?. AAI Workshop, Prosodic Interfaces, A. Mettouchi; G. Ferré (ed.). Nantes: Université de Nantes, UFR Lettres et Langage, AAI (Acoustique, Aquisition, Interprétation), 15-20.
2. Barry, W. J.; Russo, M. 2004. Isocronia oggettiva o soggettiva? Relazioni tra tempo articolatorio e quantificazione ritmica. In Il parlato Italiano, F. A. Leoni; F. Cutugno; M. Pettorino; R. Savy (ed.). Napoli, 13-15 febbraio 2003, Napoli: D'Auria, cdrom A02.
3. Barry, W. J; Andreeva, B.; Russo, M.; Dimitrova, S.; Kostadinova, T., 2003. Do Rhythm Measures Tell us Anything about Language Type?. 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, M.-J. Solé; D. Recasens; J. Romero (ed.). Barcelona: Causal Productions Pty Ltd, 2693-2696.
4. Bertinetto, P.M., 1981. Strutture prosodiche dell'italiano. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.
5. Bolinger, D., 1965. Forms of English: Accent, morpheme, order. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
6. Dasher, R.; Bolinger, D., 1982. On pre-accentual lengthening. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 12, 58-69.
7. Dauer, R.M. (1983) Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics 11, 51-62.
8. Dauer, M. R., 1987. Phonetic and phonological components of language rhythm. 11th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Tallinn, Estonia: U.S.S.R./Academy of Science of the Estonian S.S.R., vol. 5, 447-450.
9. Gibbon, D.; Gut, U., 2001. Measuring speech rhythm. Eurospeech 2001-Scandinavia, P. Dalsgaard; B. Lindberg; H. Benner (ed.). Aalborg: Kommunik Grafiske Losninger A/S, vol. 1, pp. 95-98.
10. Grabe, E.; Low, E. L., 2002. Durational Variability and the Rhythm Class Hypothesis. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology 7, C. Gussenhoven; N. Warner (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 515-546.
11. Hoequist, C. Jr., 1983. Durational correlates of linguistic rhythm categories. Phonetica 40, 19-31.
12. IPDS, 1994. The Kiel Corpus of Read Speech. Kiel: Institut für Phonetik und digitale Sprachverarbeitung, vol. 1, CDROM #1.
13. [13] IPDS, 1994-1997. The Kiel Corpus of Spontaneus Speech. Kiel: Institut für Phonetik und digitale Sprachverarbeitung, vol. 1-3, CD-ROM #2-4.
14. Low, E.L.; Grabe, E., 1995. Prosodic patterns in Singapore English. XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, K. Elenius; P. Branderud (ed.). Stockholm: KTH and Stockholm University, vol. 3, pp. 636-639.
15. Pike, K. L. 1945. The intonation of American English, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
16. Nespor, M., 1990. On the rhythm parameter in phonology. In Logical Issues in Language Acquisition, I.M. Roca (ed.), Dordrecht: Foris, 157-175.
17. Ramus, F., 1999. Rythme des langues et acquisition du langage. Doctoral dissertation. Paris: EHESS.
18. Ramus, F., 2002. Acoustic correlates of linguistic rhythm: Perspectives. Speech Prosody, B. Bel; I. Marlien (ed.). Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage, 115-120.
19. Ramus, F.; Nespor, M.; Mehler, J., 1999. Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition 73, 265-292.
20. Russo, M.; Barry, William J., 2004. In che misura l'italiano è 'iso-sillabico'? Una comparazione quantitativa tra l'italiano e il tedesco. In Generi, Architetture e forme testuali, P. D'Achille (ed.). Firenze: Cesati, 387-401.