After invention of the h-index, is there a place for the teaching track in academic promotion?

Higher Education Research and Development

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 848-850

  Nunn, Roger ^a   Pillay, Avin ^a  

^a KHALIFA UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902654636     PISSN: 07294360     EISSN: 14698366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2014.915465     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2007). What do we know about the h index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1381-1385. doi: 10.1002/asi.20609
2. Glanzel, W. (2006). On the opportunities and limitations of the h-index. Science Focus, 1(1), 10-11.
3. Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 12(6), 16569-16572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102
4. Kelly, C.D., & Jennions, M.D. (2006). The h index and career assessment by numbers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21(4), 167-170. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.005
5. Pillay, A. (2013). Academic promotion and the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(12), 2598-2599. doi: 10.1002/asi.22998
6. Probert, B. (2013). Teaching focused academic appointments in Australian universities: Recognition, specialisation or stratification? (Discussion Paper 1). Office for Learning and Teaching. Retrieved April 14, 2014, from http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-teaching-focused-academic-appointments