Active pollination favours sexual dimorphism in floral scent

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 280, Issue 1772, 2013, Pages

  Okamoto, Tomoko ^a   Kawakita, Atsushi ^a   Goto, Ryutaro ^a   Svensson, Glenn P ^b   Kato, Makoto ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Epicephala; Floral scent; Obligate pollination mutualism; Phyllanthaceae; Sexual dimorphism

Indexed keywords

ALTRUISM; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FLOWER VISITING; MOTH; OBLIGATE BEHAVIOR; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; SCENT MARKING; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; ZOOPHILY;

ANGIOSPERM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; EGG LAYING; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FLOWER; JAPAN; MASS FRAGMENTOGRAPHY; MOTH; ODOR; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION;

ANGIOSPERMS; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FLOWERS; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY; JAPAN; MOTHS; ODORS; OVIPOSITION; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION; SMELL;

EID: 84902654616     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2280     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Darwin C. 1871 Sexual selection and the descent of man. London, UK: John Murray.
2. Barrett SCH, Hough J. 2013 Sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 67-82. (doi:10. 1093/jxb/ers308)
3. Ashman TL. 2009 Sniffing out patterns of sexual dimorphism in floral scent. Funct. Ecol. 23, 852-862. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01590.x)
4. Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1977 Secondary sex characters in plants. Bot. Rev. 43, 177-216. (doi:10.1007/ BF02860717)
5. Willson MF, Ågren J. 1989 Differential floral rewards and pollination by deceit in unisexual flowers. Oikos 55, 23-29. (doi:10.2307/3565868)
6. Waser NM, Ollerton J. 2006 Plant-pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7. Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD. 2004 Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 35, 375-403. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132347)
8. Soler CCL, Proffit M, Bessière JM, Hossaert-McKey M, Schatz B. 2012 Evidence for intersexual chemical mimicry in a dioecious plant. Ecol. Lett. 15, 978-985. (doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01818.x)
9. Hemborg ÅM, Bond WJ. 2005 Different rewards in female and male flowers can explain the evolution of sexual dimorphism in plant. Biol. J. Lenn. Soc. 85, 97-109. (doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00477.x)
10. Kato M, Takimura A, Kawakita A. 2003 An obligate pollination mutualism and reciprocal diversification in the tree genus Glochidion (Euphorbiaceae). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5264-5267. (doi:10.1073/ pnas.0837153100)
11. Kawakita A. 2010 Evolution of obligate pollination mutualism in the tribe Phyllantheae (Phyllanthaceae). Plant Spec. Biol. 25, 3-19. (doi:10.1111/j.1442-1984.2009.00266.x)
12. Kawakita A, Kato M. 2009 Repeated independent evolution of obligate pollination mutualism in the Phyllantheae-Epicephala association. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 417-426. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1226)
13. Okamoto T, Kawakita A, Kato M. 2007 Interspecific variation of floral scent composition in Glochidion and its association with host-specific pollinating seed parasite (Epicephala). J. Chem. Ecol. 33, 1065-1081. (doi:10.1007/s10886-007-9287-0)
14. Svensson GP, Okamoto T, Kawakita A, Goto R, Kato M. 2010 Chemical ecology of obligate pollination mutualisms: testing the 'private channel' hypothesis in the Breynia-Epicephala. New. Phytol. 186, 995-1004. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03227.x)
15. Proctor M, Yeo P, Lack A. 1996 The natural history of pollination. Portland, OR: Timber Press.
16. Linstrom PJ, Mallard WG (eds). 2012 NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 20899. http://webbook. nist.gov (accessed 7 September 2012).
17. El-Sayed AM. 2008 The pherobase: database of insect pheromones and semiochemicals. See http:// www.pherobase.com.
18. Bray JR, Curtis JT. 1957 An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27, 325-349. (doi:10.2307/1942268)
19. Felsenstein J. 1985 Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1-15. (doi:10. 1086/284325)
20. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2008 Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis (v. 2.5). See http://mesquiteproject.org.