Comprehensive Target Populations for Current Active Safety Systems Using National Crash Databases

Traffic Injury Prevention

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 753-761

  Kusano, Kristofer D ^a   Gabler, Hampton C ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

active safety; CDS; FARS; GES; NMVCCS

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE SAFETY; ARTICLE; CAR DRIVING; CDS; FACTUAL DATABASE; FARS; GES; HUMAN; INJURY; INJURY SCALE; MORTALITY; NMVCCS; PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; UNITED STATES;

ACTIVE SAFETY; CDS; FARS; GES; NMVCCS;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; PROTECTIVE DEVICES; RISK FACTORS; TRAUMA SEVERITY INDICES; UNITED STATES; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 84902651328     PISSN: 15389588     EISSN: 1538957X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2013.871003     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Balint A, Fagerlind H, Kullgren A. A test-based method for the assessment of pre-crash warning and braking systems. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;59:192-199.
2. Bühne J, Lüdeke A, Schönebeck S, et al. Socio-economic Impact of Safety Systems. Assessment of Integrated Vehicle Safety Systems for Improved Vehicle Safety (ASSESSS) Project. 2012. European Commission 7th Framework Programme, Deliverable D2.2.
3. Compton CP. Injury severity codes: a comparison of police injury codes and medical outcomes as determined by NASS CDS investigators. J Safety Res. 2005;36:483-484.
4. Eigen AM, Najm WG. Problem Definition for Pre-Crash Sensing Advanced Restraints. US Department of Transportation, NHTSA; 2009. DOT HS 811 114.
5. Fildes BN, Lane JC, Lenard J, Vulcan AP. Passenger Cars and Occupant Injury: Side Impact Crashes. Canberra, Australia: Federal Office of Road Safety; 1994. Report CR 134.
6. Gennarelli TA, Wodzin E. AIS 2005. Barrington, IL: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine; 2005.
7. Kusano KD, Gabler HC. On-scene determination of driver crash causation and avoidance maneuvers in rear-end collisions. Paper presented at: 3rd International Conference on Road Safety and Simulation; 2011; Indianapolis, IN.
8. Kusano KD, Gabler HC. Identification of target populations for current active safety systems using driver behavior. Paper presented at: 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium; June 3, 2012; Alcala de Henares, Spain.
9. Lee SE, Llanaras E, Klauer S, Sudweeks J. Analyses of Rear-end Crashes and Near-Crashes in the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study to Support Rear-Signaling Countermeasure Development. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2007. Report Number DOT HS 810 846.
10. Lenard J, Danton R. Accident Data Study in Support of Development of Autonomous Emergency Braking Test Procedures. Loughborough, UK: Loughborough University; 2010.
11. McLaughlin SB, Hankey JM, Klauer SG, Dingus TA. Contributing Factors to Run-Off-Road Crashes and Near-Crashes. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2009. Report DOT HS 811 079.
12. National Safety Council. Crashes Involving Cell Phones-Challenges of Collecting and Reporting Reliable Crash Data. Itasca, IL: National Safety Council; 2013.
13. NHTSA. 2010 FARS/NASS GES Standardization. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2011. Report Number DOT HS 811 564.
14. US Department of Transportation. Safety Pilot Fact Sheet. US Department of Transportation; 2011. Report Number FHWA-JPO-11-124.
15. van Kampen B. ASTERYX-Assessing the European Road Safety Problem and Exploitation Study of the CARE Database. The Netherlands: SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research; 2003. Contract No. P TREN/E3?sI2.273205.
16. van Noort M, Bakri T, Fahrenkrog F, Dobberstein J. SIMPATO-the safety impact assessment tool of interactIVe. Paper presented at: 16th International IEEE Annual Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013); October 6-9, 2013; The Hague, The Netherlands.
17. Vulcan P, Fildes B, Cameron M, et al. Feasibility of Occupant Protection Measures. Clayton, Australia: Monash University Accident Research Centre; 1992.
18. Willemsen D, Malone K, Bakri T, et al. Specifications of the Evaluation Framework, interactIVe Project. Aachen, Germany: The InteractIVe Consortium; 2011. Deliverable D7.2.