Pareto-improving and self-sustainable pricing for the morning commute with nonidentical commuters

Transportation Science

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 159-169

  Xiao, Feng ^a   Zhang, H M ^b,c  

^a SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b University of California   (United States)

^c TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bimodal competition; Heterogeneity; Pareto improving; Self sustainable; Value of time

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; TRANSPORTATION;

BENEFIT DISTRIBUTION; DEPARTURE TIME CHOICE; EXTERNAL INVESTMENTS; HETEROGENEITY; PARETO IMPROVING; SELF-SUSTAINABLE; TRANSPORTATION NETWORK; VALUE OF TIME;

TRAFFIC CONGESTION;

EID: 84902650844     PISSN: 00411655     EISSN: 15265447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1120.0450     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Arnott R, Kraus M (1995) Financing capacity in the bottleneck model. J. Urban Econom. 38(3):272-290.
2. Cantarella G, Cascetta E (1995) Dynamic processes and equilibrium in transportation networks: Toward a unifying theory. Transportation Sci. 29(4):305-329.
3. Dial RB (1996) Bicriterion traffic assignment: Basic theory and elementary algorithms. Transportation Sci. 30(2):93-111.
4. Dial RB (1997) Bicriterion traffic assignment: Efficient algorithms plus examples. Transportation Res. Part B 31(5):357-379.
5. Dial RB (1999) Network-optimized road pricing: Part I: A parable and a model. Oper. Res. 47(1):54-64.
6. Foster C, Richardson H (1975) A note on the distributional effects of road pricing (comment and rejoinder). J. Transport Econom. Policy 8(1):186-188.
7. Hau TDK (1992) Economic Fundamentals of Road Pricing: A Diagrammatic Analysis (World Bank Publications, Washington, DC).
8. Huang HJ (2000) Fares and tolls in a competitive system with transit and highway: The case with two groups of commuters. Transportation Res. Part E 36(4):267-284.
9. Huang HJ (2002) Pricing and logit-based mode choice models of a transit and highway system with elastic demand. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 140(3):562-570.
10. Jin W (2007) A dynamical system model of the traffic assignment problem. Transportation Res. Part B 41(1):32-48.
11. Leurent F (1993) Cost versus time equilibrium over a network. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 71(2):205-221.
12. Leurent FM (1996) The theory and practice of a dual criteria assignment model with a continuously distributed value-oftime. Lesort JB, ed. Transportation and Traffic Theory (Pergamon, Exeter, UK), 455-477.
13. Liu Y, Guo X, Yang H (2009) Pareto-improving and revenueneutral congestion pricing schemes in two-mode traffic networks. Netnomics 10(1):123-140.
14. Marcotte P (1999) Reformulations of a bicriterion equilibrium model. Fukushima M, Qi L, eds. Reformulation: Nonsmooth, Piecewise Smooth, Semismooth and Smoothing Methods (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), 269-291.
15. Marcotte P, Zhu D (2009) Existence and computation of optimal tolls in multiclass network equilibrium problems. Oper. Res. Lett. 37(3):211-214.
16. Mayet J, Hansen M (2000) Congestion pricing with continuously distributed values of time. J. Transport Econom. Policy 34(3):359-369.
17. Newell GF (1987) The morning commute for nonidentical travelers. Transportation Sci. 21(2):74-88.
18. Raux C, Souche S (2004) The acceptability of urban road pricing: A theoretical analysis applied to experience in Lyon. J. Transport Econom. Policy 38(2):191-215.
19. Tabuchi T (1993) Bottleneck congestion and modal split. J. Urban Econom. 34(3):414-431.