A roller coaster of emotions and sense - coping with the perceived psychosocial consequences of a false-positive screening mammography

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Volumn 23, Issue 13-14, 2014, Pages 2053-2062

  Bolejko, Anetta ^a,b   Zackrisson, Sophia ^b   Hagell, Peter ^c   Wann Hansson, Christine ^a,d  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c KRISTIANSTAD UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Content analysis; False positive screening mammography; Mammographic screening; Qualitative studies; Women's health

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING; PSYCHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; SWEDEN; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE'S ROLE; SWEDEN; WOMEN'S HEALTH; WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 84902649918     PISSN: 09621067     EISSN: 13652702     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12426     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allen JD, Shelton RC, Harden E & Goldman RE (2008) Follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms among low-income ethnically diverse women: findings from a qualitative study. Patient Education and Counseling 72, 283-292.
2. Austoker J & Ong G (1994) Written information needs of women who are recalled for further investigation of breast screening: results of a multicentre study. Journal of Medical Screening 1, 238-244.
3. Bolejko A, Wann-Hansson C, Zackrisson S, Brodersen J & Hagell P (2013) Adaptation to Swedish and further development of the "Consequences of Screening - Breast Cancer" questionnaire: a multimethod study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 27, 475-486.
4. Bond M, Pavey T, Welch K, Cooper C, Garside R, Dean S & Hyde CJ (2013) Psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammograms in the UK. Evidence-based Medicine 18, 54-61.
5. Bowland L, Cockburn J, Cawson J, Anderson HC, Moorehead S & Kenny M (2003) Counselling interventions to address the psychological consequences of screening mammography: a randomised trial. Patient Education and Counseling 49, 189-198.
6. Brett J, Bankhead C, Henderson B, Watson E & Austoker J (2005) The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review. Psycho-Oncology 14, 917-938.
7. Brewer NT, Salz T & Lillie SE (2007) Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Annals of Internal Medicine 146, 502-510.
8. Brodersen J & Thrsen H (2008) Consequences of Screening in Breast Cancer (COS-BC): development of a questionnaire. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Care 26, 251-256.
9. Brodersen J, Thorsen H & Cockburn J (2004) The adequacy of measurement of short and long-term consequences of false-positive screening mammography. Journal of medical screening 11, 39-44.
10. Brodersen J, Thorsen H & Kreiner S (2007) Validation of a condition-specific measure for women having an abnormal screening mammography. Value in Health 10, 294-304.
11. European Commission (2006) European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis (4th edn). Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph_projects/2002/cancer/fp_cancer_2002_ext_guid_01.pdf (accessed 31 January 2013).
12. European Commission (2008) Cancer Screening in the European Union. Report on the Implementation of the Council Recommendation on Cancer Screening (First report). Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_determinants/genetics/documents/cancer_screening.pdf (accessed 31 January 2013).
13. Euroscreen Working Group (2012) Summary of the evidence of breast cancer service screening outcomes in Europe and first estimate of the benefit and harm balance sheet. Journal of Medical Screening 19(Suppl. 1), 5-13.
14. Gotzsche PC & Nielsen M (2011) Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 19, 1-74.
15. Graneheim UH & Lundman B (2004) Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today 24, 105-112.
16. Hofvind S, Ponti A, Patnick J, Ascunce N, Njor S, Broeders M, Giordano L, Frigerio A, Tornberg S, Van Hal G, Martens P, Majek O, Danes J, von Euler-Chelpin M, Aasmaa A, Anttila A, Becker N, Pentek Z, Budai A, Madai S, Fitzpatrick P, Mooney T, Zappa M, Ventura L, Scharpantgen A, Seroczynski P, Morais A, Rodrigues V, Bento MJ, Gomes de Carvalho J, Natal C, Prieto M, Sanchez-Contador Escudero C, Zubizarreta Alberti R, Fernandez Llanes SB, Ederra Sanza M, Sarriugarte Irigoien G, Salas Trejo D, Ibanez Cabanell J, Wiege M, Ohlsson G, Korzeniewska M, de Wolf C, Fracheboud J, Lancucki L, Ducarroz S & Suonio E (2012) False-positive results in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review and survey of service screening programmes. Journal of Medical Screening 19(Suppl. 1), 57-66.
17. Hsieh HF & Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15, 1277-1288.
18. Juth N & Munthe C (2011) The Ethics of Screening in Health Care and Medicine. Serving Society or Serving the Patient? Springer, Dordrecht.
19. Lazarus RS (1993) Coping theory and research: past, present, and future. Psychosomatic Medicine 55, 234-247.
20. Lazarus RS & Folkman S (1984) Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer, New York, NY.
21. Lincoln YS & Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
22. Olsson S, Andersson I, Karlberg I, Bjurstam N, Frodis E & Håkansson S (2000) Implementation of service screening with mammography in Sweden: from pilot study to nationwide programme. Journal of Medical Screening 7, 14-18.
23. Padgett DK, Yedidia MJ, Kerner J & Mandelblatt J (2001) The emotional consequences of false positive mammography: African-American women's reactions in their own words. Women and Health 33, 1-14.
24. Salz T, Richman AR & Brewer NT (2010) Meta-analyses of the effect of false-positive mammograms on generic and specific psychosocial outcomes. Psycho-Oncology 19, 1026-1034.
25. Solbjor M, Forsmo S, Skolbekken JA & Saetnan AR (2011) Experiences of recall after mammography screening-a qualitative study. Health Care for Women International 32, 1009-1027.
26. The Council of the European Union (2003) Council Recommendation of 2 December 3002 on Research on Cancer Screening. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:327:0034:0038:EN:PDF(accessed 15 April 2010).
27. The National Board of Health and Welfare (2007a) Notional Guidelines for Breast Health Care. Available at: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2007/2007-102-2 (accessed 31 January 2013).
28. The National Board of Health and Welfare (2007b) National Guidelines for Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer. Available at: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2007/2007-102-9 (accessed 31 January 2013).
29. Thorne SE, Harris SR, Hislop TG & Vestrup JA (1999) The experience of waiting for diagnosis after an abnormal mammogram. The Breast Journal 5, 42-51.
30. Willis K (2008) "I come because I am called": recruitment and participation in mammography screening in Uppsala, Sweden. Health Care for Women International 29, 135-150.
31. World Health Organisation. International Agency for Research on Cancer (2002) IACR Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. Breast Cancer Screening (7). IARC Press, Lyon.