Our privacy, ourselves in the age of technological intrusions

Human Rights in the War on Terror

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 258-294

  Galison, Peter ^a   Minow, Martha ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902605818     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/9780511511288.015     Document Type: Chapter

References (100)

1. Aleinikoff, T. A. (1987). ‘Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing’. 96 Yale Law Journal 943.
2. Allen, A. L. (1988). Uneasy Access: Privacy for Women in a Free Society. Totowa, NJ: Rowland & Littlefield.
3. Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (revised edition). New York: Verso.
4. Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. New York: Doubleday.
5. Atlanta Journal-Constitution. ‘Balance Information With Privacy. 10 December 2003, p. 22A.
6. Baer, S. (2003, January 5). ‘Broader U.S. Spy Initiative Debated; Poindexter Leads Project to Assess Electronic Data, Detect Possible Terrorists; Civil Liberties Concerns Raised’. Baltimore Sun, p. 1A (quoting Jay Stanley of the American Civil Liberties Union).
7. Baldas, T. (2004, August 9). ‘ACLU Takes on “Matrix” Crime, Terrorism Database’. National Law Journal, p. 4.
8. Bloom, H. (1998). Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human. New York: Riverhead Books.
9. Borger, J. (2002, May 21). ‘Shamed FBI’s Snooping Powers Increased’. The Guardian (London), p. 18.
10. Boyle, J. (1992). ‘A Theory of Law and Information: Copyright, Spleens, Blackmail, and Insider Trading'. 80 California Law Review 1413.
11. Brest, P. (1982). ‘State Action and Liberal Theory: A Casenote on Flagg Brothers v. Brooks’. 130 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1296.
12. California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988).
13. Choper, J. (1979). ‘Thoughts on State Action: The “Government Function,” and “Power Theory” Approaches’. Washington University Law Quarterly 757.
14. CNN.com. (2003, July 30). ‘Amid furor, Pentagon kills terrorism futures market’. Inside Politics. Available at: http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/07/29/terror.market/index.html.
15. Committee on Science and Technology for Countering Terrorism (CSTCT). (2002). Making the Nation Safer: The Role of Science and Technology in Countering Terrorism. National Research Council of the National Academies. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
16. DARPA (2003, May 20). Report to Congress Regarding the Terrorism Information Awareness Program. Available at: http://www.globalsecurity.org/security/library/report/2003/tia- di_report_20may2003.pdf.
17. Davidson, A. (1994). ‘Ethics as Ascetics: Foucault, The History of Ethics and Ancient Thought’. In J. E. Goldstein (Ed.), Foucault and the Writing of History. Cambridge: Blackwell.
18. DeCew, J. W. (1997). In Pursuit of Privacy: Law, Ethics, and the Rise of Technology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
19. Denver Post. ‘Virtual Borders vs. Civil Liberties’. 31 May 2004, p. C-07.
20. Directionsmag.com. (1998). ‘Acxiom’s InfoBase Profiler Via the Acxiom Data Network is First Consumer Data Product to Provide Census and Household-Level Demographic Data and Scores in Sub-Second Time’. 3 December 1998, Press Release, Acxiom Corp. Available at http://www.directionsmag.com/press.releases/index.php?duty= Show&id=80.
21. Ditzion, R., Geddes, E., & Rhodes, M. (2003, Spring). ‘Computer Crimes’. American Criminal Law Review, vol. 40, issue 2, p. 285(52).
22. Dixon, R. (1976). ‘The “New” Substantive Due Process and the Democratic Ethic: A Prolegomenon’. Brigham Young University Law Review 43.
23. Dodson, A. J. (2000, Winter). ‘DNA “Line-Ups” Based on a Reasonable Suspicion Standard’. University of Colorado Law Review, vol. 71, issue 1, pp. 221-254.
24. Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972).
25. Executive Summary of the Independent Counsel Investigation (the Walsh Report). Available at: http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/walsh/execsum.htm.
26. Fisher, W. W., Horwitz, M. J., & Reed, T. (Eds.). (1993). American Legal Realism. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Flagg Brothers, Inc. v. Brooks, 436 U.S. 149 (1978).
28. Florida Riley v., 488 U.S. 445 (1989).
29. Foucault, M. (1986). History of Sexuality, vol. 3: The Care of the Self (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
30. Friendly, H. (1969). ‘The Dartmouth College Case and the Public-Private Penumbra’. Austin: University of Texas.
31. Galison, P. (2004). ‘Image of Self. In L. Daston (Ed.), Things that Talk. Cambridge: Zone Books.
32. Goldstein, J. (1994). ‘Foucault and the Post-Revolutionary Self: The Uses of Cousinian Pedagogy in Nineteenth-Century France’. In J. Goldstein (Ed.), Foucault and the Writing of History, pp. 99-115. Oxford: Blackwell.
33. Grand, J. S. (2002, August). ‘The Blooding of America: Privacy and the DNA Dragnet’. Cardozo Law Review, vol. 23, issue 6, pp. 2277-323.
34. Green, R. M. & Thomas, A. M. (1998). ‘DNA: Five Distinguishing Features for Policy Analysis’. 11 Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 571.
35. Greer, S. (2003, September). ‘Constitutionalizing Adjudication Under the European Convention on Human Rights’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 23, issue 3, pp. 405-433(29).
36. Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
37. Guerrand, R.-H. (1990). ‘Private Spaces’. In M. Perrot (Ed.), A. Goldhammer, (Transl.), A History of Private Life, vol. 4: From the Fires of Revolution to the Great War, pp. 359-74. P. Aries and G. Duby (general Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, Harvard University Press.
38. Hadot, P. (1995). Philosophy as a Way of Life. New York: Blackwell.
39. Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. Routledge.
40. Henkin, L. (1974). ‘Privacy and Autonomy’. 74 Columbia Law Review 1410.
41. Hetcher, S. (2001). ‘Changing the Social Meaning of Privacy in Cyberspace’. 15 Harvard Journal ofLaw and Technology 149.
42. Hoofnagle, C. J. (2004, Summer). ‘Big Brother’s Little Helpers: How ChoicePoint and Other Commercial Data Brokers Collect, Process, and Package Your Data for Law Enforcement’. University of North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 595-637.
43. Horwitz, M. (1982). ‘The History of the Public/Private Distinction’. 130 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1423.
44. Ignatieff, M. (2002a, February 5). ‘Is the Human Rights Era Ending?’ New York Times, p. A29.
45. Ignatieff, M (2002b). Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46. Kang, J. (1998). ‘Information Privacy in Cyberspace Transactions’. 50 Stanford Law Review 1193.
47. Kang, J. & Buchner, B. (2004, Fall). ‘Privacy in Atlantis: A Dialogue of Form and Substance’. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 18, no. 1. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstractJd=626942.
48. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967).
49. Kaye, D. H. (2001, Summer). ‘The Constitutionality of DNA Sampling on Arrest’.Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, vol. 10, issue 3, p. 455(55).
50. Kyllov. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001).
51. LaFave, W. (1966). 1 Search and Seizure (3rd ed.), section 2.1(d), pp. 393-4
52. Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).
53. Lawyers Committee for Human Rights (herein “LCHR”). (2003). Assessing the New Normal: Liberty and Security for the Post-September 11 United States. New York. Available at: http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/pubs/descriptions/Assessing/AssessingtheNewNormal.pdf.
54. Mark, R. (2003, July 29). ‘Pentagon Folds Hand in Online Terrorism Futures Scheme’.Available at: http://dc.internet.com/news/article.php/2241421.
55. Markle Foundation (2003). Creating a Trusted Information Network for Homeland Security: Second Report of the Markle Foundation Task Force. Available at: http://www.markletaskforce.org/Report2_Full_Report.pdf.
56. Martin, L. H., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P. H. (Eds.). (1988). ‘Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel FoucaultAmherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
57. McClurg, A. J. (2003). ‘A Thousand Words Are Worth a Picture: A Privacy Tort Response to Consumer Data Profiling’. 98 Northwestern University Law Review 63.
58. Minnesota v. Carter, 525 U.S. 93, 97 (1998).
59. Minow, M. (1987). ‘We, The Family: Constitutional Rights and American Families’. Journal of American History, vol. 74, no. 3, p. 959.
60. Mitchell, W. J. (2003). Me++: The Cyborg Self and the Networked City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Multi-State Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange (MATRIX). Available at: http://www.matrix-at.org/. Accessed on 24 August 2004.
62. National Law Journal Roundtable (2003, April 26). ‘Patriot Act Attacked’. 26 April 2003, p. 19.
63. Nissbenbaum, H. (2004). ‘Privacy as Contextual Integrity. 79 Washington Law Review 119.
64. Nussbaum, M. (2003). ‘Compassion and Terror’. In J. P. Sterba (Ed.), Terrorism and International Justice, pp. 229-52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. Peller, G. (1985). ‘The Metaphysics of American Law’. 73 California Law Review 1151
66. Perrot, M. (1990). ‘The Secret of the Individual’. In M. Perrot (Ed.), A. Goldhammer, (Transl.), A History of Private Life, vol. 4: From the Fires of Revolution to the Great War, pp. 457-548. P. Aries and G. Duby (general Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, Harvard University Press.
67. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). Pohlmann, N. & Crothers, T. (2002). Firewall Architecture for the Enterprise. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
68. Poindexter, J. (2002, August 2). ‘Overview of the Information Awareness Office’. Prepared remarks for delivery at DARPATech 2002, Anaheim, CA, Aug. 2, 2002. Available at: http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/dod/poindexter.html.
69. Posner, R. (1979). ‘The Uncertain Protection of Privacy by the Supreme Court’.Supreme Court Review 173, 188.
70. Post, R. C. (2001). ‘Three Concepts of Privacy. 89 Georgetown Law Journal 2087.
71. Rasul v. Bush, 124 S. Ct. 2686, 159 L. Ed. 2d 548, 72 U.S.L.W. 4596, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 4760 (2004).
72. Regnier, T. (2004, Spring). ‘The “Loyal Foot Soldier”: Can the Fourth Amendment Survive the Supreme Court’s War on Drugs?’ UKMC Law Review, vol. 72, issue 3, pp. 631-68.
73. Reiss, S. (2004, May). ‘Poindexter Confidential’. Wired Magazine, Issue 12.05. Available at: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.05/poindexter.html.
74. Rendell-Baker v. Kohn, 457 U.S. 830 (1982).
75. Rennie, D. (2003, August 1). ‘Admiral Behind Terrorist Futures Market “To Quit”’. Daily Telegraph (London), p. 20.
76. ‘Responses by Center for Democracy and Technology and Other Civil Liberties Organizations to TIA Report’ (herein “Responses”) (2003, August 20). Available at: http://www.cdt.org/security/usapatriot/030520cdt.shtml.
77. R. L. Polk & Co. (2005). ‘Automotive Profiling System’. Available at: http://www.polk.com/products/aps.asp.
78. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
79. Rosen, J. (2000). The Unwanted Gaze: The Destruction of Privacy in America. New York: Vintage.
80. Safire, W. (2003, February 13). ‘Privacy Invasion Curtailed’. New York Times, p. 41.
81. Samuelson, P. (2000). ‘Privacy as Intellectual Property?’ 52 Stanford Law Review 1125.
82. Schneier, B. (2003). Beyond Fear: Thinking Sensibly About Security in an Uncertain World. New York: Springer-Verlag.
83. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Conditions to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
84. Solove, D. J. (2002). ‘Conceptualizing Privacy’. 90 California Law Review 1087.
85. Solove, D. J. & Rotenberg, M. (2003). Information Privacy Law, p. 27. NewYork: Aspen Publishers.
86. St. Petersburg Times (Florida). ‘Total Information Awareness II?’ 31 May 2004, p. 12A.
87. Stone, G. R. (2004). Perilous Times: Free Speech in Wartime from the Sedition Act of 1789 to the War on Terrorism. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
88. Strathern, M. (2003).‘EmergentRelations’. InM. Biagioli&P. Galison (Eds.). Scientific Authorship, pp. 169-94, chapter 7. NewYork: Routledge.
89. Sudell, A. (2001). ‘Comment: To Tell or Not to Tell: The Scope of Physician-Patient Confidentiality When Relatives Are at Risk of Genetic Disease’. 18 Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy 273.
90. Sutherland, J. (2002, February 18). ‘No more Mr Scrupulous Guy’. The Guardian (United Kingdom). Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,3604,651950,00.html.
91. Technology and Privacy Advisory Committee (herein “TPAC”) (2004, March 1). Safeguarding Privacy in the Fight Against Terrorism: Report of the Technology and Privacy Advisory Committee to the Department of Defense. Available at: http://www. mipt.org/pdf/Safeguarding-Privacy-Fight-Against-Terrorism.pdf.
92. Times-Picayune (New Orleans, LA). ‘Plots at Public Meetings?’ 3 June 2002, p. 4.
93. Turkel, S. (1997). Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Touchstone.
94. United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984).
95. Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (herein “USA PATRIOT Act”), Pub. L. No. 107-56, 302(a) (1), 115 Stat. 272 (2001).
96. Warren, S. D. & Brandeis, L. D. (1890). ‘The Right to Privacy’. 4 Harvard Law Review 193.
97. Weaver, K. D. (1997). ‘Genetic Screening and the Right Not to Know’. Issues in Law & Medicine, vol. 13. no. 3, p. 243.
98. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 492 U.S. 490 (1989).
99. Weintraub, B. (1986, November 26). ‘Iran Payment Found Diverted to Contras; Reagan Security Advisor and Aide Are Out’. New York Times, p. A1.
100. Westin, A. F. (1967). Privacy and Freedom. London: Bodley Head.