Towards competency question-driven ontology authoring

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8465 LNCS, Issue , 2014, Pages 752-767

  Ren, Yuan ^a   Parvizi, Artemis ^a   Mellish, Chris ^a   Pan, Jeff Z ^a   Van Deemter, Kees ^a   Stevens, Robert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

DIFFERENT DOMAINS; NON-TRIVIAL TASKS; REAL-WORLD;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84902602808     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07443-6_50     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press (2003)
2. Beaver, D.: Presupposition. In: van Benthem, J., ter Meulen, A. (eds.) The Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 939-1008. Elsevier (1997)
3. Bezerra, C., Freitas, F., Santana, F.: Evaluating ontologies with competency questions. In: 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT), vol. 3, pp. 284-285. IEEE (2013)
4. Borgo, S., Masolo, C.: Foundational choices in dolce. In: Handbook on ontologies, pp. 361-381. Springer (2009)
5. Denaux, R., Dimitrova, V., Cohn, A.G., Dolbear, C., Hart, G.: Rabbit to OWL: Ontology authoring with a CNL-based tool. In: Fuchs, N.E. (ed.) CNL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5972, pp. 246-264. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
6. Denaux, R., Thakker, D., Dimitrova, V., Cohn, A.G.: Interactive semantic feedback for intuitive ontology authoring. In: FOIS, pp. 160-173 (2012)
7. Dzbor, M., Motta, E., Gomez, J.M., Buil, C., Dellschaft, K., Görlitz, O., Lewen, H.: D4.1.1 analysis of user needs, behaviours & requirements wrt user interfaces for ontology engineering. Technical report (August. 2006)
8. Fernandes, P.C.B., Guizzardi, R.S., Guizzardi, G.: Using goal modeling to capture competency questions in ontology-based systems. Journal of Information and Data Management 2(3), 527 (2011)
9. Gaasterland, T., Godfrey, P., Minker, J.: An Overview of Cooperative Answering. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 1(2), 123-157 (1992)
10. Kaplan, S.J.: Cooperative Responses from a Portable Natural Language Query System. Artificial Intelligence 19(2), 165-187 (1982)
11. Liebig, T., Noppens, O.: Ontotrack: A semantic approach for ontology authoring. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 3(2), 116-131 (2005)
12. Lord, P.: The semantic web takes wing: Programming ontologies with tawny-owl. In: OWLED 2013 (2013)
13. Malheiros, Y., Freitas, F.: A method to develop description logic ontologies iteratively based on competency questions: an implementation. In: ONTOBRAS, pp. 142-153 (2013)
14. Palmer, S.R., Felsing, M.: A practical guide to feature-driven development. Pearson Education (2001)
15. Pan, J.Z., Thomas, E., Ren, Y., Taylor, S.: Tractable Fuzzy and Crisp Reasoning in Ontology Applications. In: IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine (2012)
16. Power, R.: OWL simplified english: A finite-state language for ontology editing. In: Kuhn, T., Fuchs, N.E. (eds.) CNL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7427, pp. 44-60. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
17. Presutti, V., Blomqvist, E., Daga, E., Gangemi, A.: Pattern-based ontology design. In: Ontology Engineering in a Networked World, pp. 35-64. Springer (2012)
18. Rector, A., Drummond, N., Horridge, M., Rogers, J., Knublauch, H., Stevens, R., Wang, H., Wroe, C.: Owl pizzas: Practical experience of teaching owl-dl: Common errors & common patterns. In: Engineering Knowledge in the Age of the Semantic Web, Springer (2004)
19. Stearns, M.Q., Price, C., Spackman, K.A., Wang, A.Y.: SNOMED Clinical Terms: Overview of the Development Process and project Status. In: Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, p. 662. American Medical Informatics Association (2001)
20. Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A., Motta, E., Gangemi, A.: Ontology engineering in a networked world. Springer (2012)
21. Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Pradel, C., Hernandez, N.: Verifying ontology requirements with SWIP. In: EKAW 2012 (2012)
22. Thomas, E., Pan, J.Z., Ren, Y.: TrOWL: Tractable OWL 2 Reasoning Infrastructure. In: Aroyo, L., Antoniou, G., Hyvönen, E., ten Teije, A., Stuckenschmidt, H., Cabral, L., Tudorache, T. (eds.) ESWC 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6089, pp. 431-435. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
23. Uschold, M., Gruninger, M.: et al. Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review 11(2), 93-136 (1996)
24. Zemmouchi-Ghomari, L., Ghomari, A.R.: Translating natural language competency questions into SPARQL queries: A case study. In: WEB 2013, pp. 81-86 (2013)