Visioning with the Public: Incorporating Public Values in Landscape Planning

European Planning Studies

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1165-1181

  de Groot, Mirjam ^a,b   Winnubst, Madelinde H ^a,c   van Schie, Nienke ^d   van Ast, Jacko A ^d  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; LEARNING; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 84902549784     PISSN: 09654313     EISSN: 14695944     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2013.770218     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Aarts, N. (1998) Een kwestie van natuur, een studie naar de aard en het verloop van communicatie over natuur en natuurbeleid, PhD, Wageningen University, Wageningen.
2. Beierle, T. C. (1999) Using social goals to evaluate public participation in environmental decisions, Policy Studies Review, 16(3/4), pp. 75-103.
3. Beierle, T. C. & Cayford, J. (2002) Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions (Washington: Resources for the Future).
4. Berkes, F. (2009) Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning, Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), pp. 1692-1702.
5. Bogaert, D., Cliquet, A., & De Zitter, M. (2003) Draagvlakonderzoek bij natuurontwikkelingsmaatregelen in Vlaanderen. De Levende Natuur, 104(2), pp. 46-51.
6. Bonnes, M., & Bonaiuto, M. (1995) Expert and layperson evaluation of urban environmental quality: The 'natural' versus the 'built' environment. In Y. Guerrier, N. Alexander, J. Chase, & M. O'Brien (Ed.), Values and the Environment; A Social Science Perspective, pp. 151-163. Chichester: John Wiley.
7. Bouwen, R. & Taillieu, T. (2004) Multi-party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: Developing relational knowing for sustainable resource management, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14(3), pp. 137-153.
8. Burgess, J. C. L., & Harrison, C. M. (1988) Exploring environmental values through the medium of small groups: 1. Theory and practice. Environment and Planning A, 20(4), pp. 309-326. doi: 10.1068/a200309
9. Butler, W. F., & Acott, T. G. (2007) An inquiry concerning the acceptance of intrinsic value theories of nature. Environmental Values, 16(2), pp. 149-168. doi: 10.3197/096327107780474528
10. Campagna, C., & Fernández, T. (2007) A comparative analysis of the vision and mission statements of international environmental organisations. Environmental Values, 16(3), pp. 369-398. doi: 10.3197/096327107X228409
11. Cole, S. (2001) Dare to dream: Bringing futures into planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(4), pp. 372-383. doi: 10.1080/01944360108976246
12. Collins, K. & Ison, R. (2006) Dare we jump off Arnsteins' ladder? Social learning as a new policy paradigm, in: Proceedings of PATH (Participatory Approaches in Science & Technology) Conference, June 4-7, Edinburgh.
13. Davenport, A., & Anderson, D. H. (2005) Getting from sense of place to place-based management: An interpretive investigation of place meanings and perceptions of landscape change. Society and Natural Resources, 18(7), pp. 625-641. doi: 10.1080/08941920590959613
14. Davies, A. R. (2001) What silence knows-planning, public participation and environmental values. Environmental Values, 10(1), pp. 77-102. doi: 10.3197/096327101129340750
15. De Groot, M., & De Groot, W. T. (2009) "Room for river" measures and public visions in the Netherlands: A survey on river perceptions among riverside residents. Water Resources Research, 45(7), W07403. doi: 10.1029/2008WR007339
16. De Groot, M., Drenthen, M., & De Groot, W. T. (2011) Public visions on the human/nature relationship and the role of environmental ethics. Environmental Ethics, 33(1), pp. 25-44. doi: 10.5840/enviroethics20113314
17. De Groot, W. T., & Van Den Born, R. J. G. (2003) Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: An exploration in the Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(3), pp. 127-138. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00184-6
18. Fischer, F. (2000) Citizens, Experts and the Environment. The Politics of Local Knowledge, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19. Gaffikin, F., & Sterrett, K. (2006) New visions for old cities: The role of visioning in planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 7(2), pp. 159-178. doi: 10.1080/14649350600673070
20. Haines, A. (1998) Using Visioning in a Comprehensive Planning Process, Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.Available at http://learningstore.uwex.edu/assets/pdfs/G3752.pdf (accessed 11 February 2013)
21. Harrison, C. M., & Burgess, J. (2000) Valuing nature in context: The contribution of common-good approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation, 9(8), pp. 1115-1130. doi: 10.1023/A:1008930922198
22. Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, London: MacMillan Press.
23. Healey, P. (1998) Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment and Planning A, 30(9), pp. 1531-1546. doi: 10.1068/a301531
24. Healey, P. (2009) The pragmatic tradition in planning thought, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(3), pp. 277-292.
25. Helling, A. (1998) Collaborative visioning: Proceed with caution! Results from evaluating Atlanta's vision 2020 project. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(3), pp. 335-349. doi: 10.1080/01944369808975990
26. Hurley, P. T., & Walker, P. A. (2004) Whose vision? Conspiracy theory and land-use planning in Nevada County, California. Environment and Planning A, 36, pp. 1529-1547. doi: 10.1068/a36186
27. Innes, J. E. & Booher, D. E. (2003) The impact of collaborative planning on governance capacity. Annual Conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Baltimore, MD.
28. Jacobs, M. H., & Buijs, A. E. (2011) Understanding stakeholders' attitudes toward water management interventions: Role of place meanings. Water Resources Research, 47(1), pp. 1-11.W01503 doi: 10.1029/2009WR008366
29. Jacobs, M. H., Van Den Berg, A. E., Van Kralingen, R., Langers, F., & De Vries, S. (2002) Een studie naar de waterbeelden van waternatuur onder medewerkers van Rijkswaterstaat, pp. 123 Wageningen: Alterra.
30. Kaltenborn, B. P., & Bjerke, T. (2002) Association between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59(1), pp. 1-11. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00243-2
31. Keulartz, J., Van Der Windt, H., & Swart, J. (2000) Natuurbeelden en natuurbeleid: Theoretische en empirische verkenningen, pp. 133 Den Haag: NWO Ethiek & Beleid.
32. Liberatore, A., & Funtowicz, A. (2003) "Democratising" expertise, "expertising" democracy: What does this mean, and why bother?. Science and Public Policy, 30(3), pp. 146-150. doi: 10.3152/147154303781780551
33. McCann, E. J. (2001) Collaborative visioning or urban planning as therapy? The politics of public-private policy making. Professional Geographer, 53(2), pp. 207-218. doi: 10.1111/0033-0124.00280
34. Minteer, B. A., & Manning, R. E. (1999) Pragmatism in environmental ethics: Democracy, pluralism, and the management of nature. Environmental Ethics, 21(2), pp. 191-208. doi: 10.5840/enviroethics199921231
35. Moore, C. M., Longo, G., & Palmer, P. (1999) Visioning. In T. Susskind, S. McKearnan, & J. Thomas-Larmer (Ed.), The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement, pp. 557-591. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Mostert, E., Pahl-Wostl, C., Rees, Y., Searle, B., Tàbara, D. & Tippett, J. (2007) Social learning in European river-basin management: Barriers and fostering mechanisms from 10 river basins, Ecology and Society, 12(1), 19. Available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art19/ (accessed 11 February 2013).
37. Morrison, K. (2003) Stakeholder involvement in water management: Necessity or luxury?. Water Science and Technology, 47(6), pp. 43-51.
38. Muro, M. & Jeffrey, P. (2008) A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(3), pp. 325-344.
39. Norton, B. G. (1991) Toward Unity Among Environmentalists, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2002) Re-thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity Press.
41. Pahl-Wostl, C. (2002) Towards sustainability in the water sector - The importance of human actors and processes in social learning, Aquatic Sciences, 64(4), pp. 394-411.
42. Pahl-Wostl, C. & Hare, M. (2004) Processes of social learning in integrated resources management, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14(3), pp. 193-206.
43. Rinaudo, J. D., & Garin, P. (2005) The benefits of combining lay and expert input for water-management planning at the watershed level. Water Policy, 7(3), pp. 279-293.
44. Rokeach, M. (1973) The Nature of Human Values, New York: The Free Press.
45. Satterfield, T. (2001) In search of value literacy: Suggestions for the elicitation of environmental values. Environmental Values, 10(3), pp. 331-359. doi: 10.3197/096327101129340868
46. Schultz, W. P. (2001) The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), pp. 327-339.
47. Schwartz, S. H. (1970) Moral decision making and behavior. In J. Macauley, & L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Altruism and Helping Behavior, pp. 127-141. New York: Academic press.
48. Selman, P. (2004) Community participation in the planning and management of cultural landscapes, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47(3), pp. 365-392.
49. Senge, P. M. (1994) The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation, New York: Doubleday.
50. Shipley, R. (2000) The origin and development of vision and visioning in planning. International Planning Studies, 5(2), pp. 225-236. doi: 10.1080/13563470050020202
51. Thompson, S. C., & Barton, M. A. (1994) Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14(2), pp. 149-157. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80168-9
52. Umemoto, K. (2001) Walking in another's shoes; epistemological challenges in participatory planning, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(1), pp. 17-31.
53. Umemoto, K. & Igarashi, H. (2009) Deliberative planning in a multicultural milieu, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29(1), pp. 39-53.
54. Van den Born, R. J. G. (2006) Implicit philosophy: Images of the people-nature relationship in the Dutch population. In R. J. G. Van den Born, R. H. J. Lenders, & W. T. De Groot (Ed.), Visions of Nature, a Scientific Exploration of People's Implicit Philosophies, pp. 61-84. Berlin: LIT Verlag.
55. Van den Born, R. J. G. (2008) Rethinking nature: Visions of nature of a Dutch public. Environmental Values, 17(1), pp. 83-110. doi: 10.3197/096327108X271969
56. Vermeulen, S. (2004) Biodiversity planning: Why and how should local opinion matter? Gatekeeper series no 115, Natural Resources Group, IIED.
57. Webler, T., Kastenholz, H. & Renn, O. (1995) Public participation in impact assessment. A social learning perspective, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15(5), pp. 443-463.
58. Wilson, I. (1992) Realizing the power of strategic vision. Long Range Planning, 25(5), pp. 18-28. doi: 10.1016/0024-6301(92)90271-3
59. Woodhouse, E. J., & Nieusma, D. A. (2001) Democratic expertise: Integrating knowledge, power and participation. In M. Hisschemöller, R. Hoppe, W. N. Dunn, & J. R. Ravetz (Ed.), Knowledge, Power, and Participation in Environmental Policy Analysis, pp. 73-96. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
60. Zweers, W. (2000) Participating with Nature. Outline for an Ecologization of our Worldview, Utrecht: International books.