Reliability and validity of shoulder function outcome measures in people with a proximal humeral fracture

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 36, Issue 13, 2014, Pages 1072-1079

  Van De Water, Alexander T M ^a   Shields, Nora ^a   Davidson, Megan ^a   Evans, Matthew ^b   Taylor, Nicholas F ^a,c  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b Melbourne Orthopeadic Group   (Australia)

^c EASTERN HEALTH   (Australia)

Author keywords

Constant Score; Disabilities of the arm; Oxford Shoulder Score; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of results; Shoulder and hand; Shoulder fractures; Subjective Shoulder Value; University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Score

Indexed keywords

AGED; CONVALESCENCE; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMERAL FRACTURES; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; HUMERAL FRACTURES; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84902532084     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2013.829529     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Kirshner B and Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis 1985;38:27-36. (Pubitemid 15136767
2. Streiner DL and Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales-A practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008
3. van De Water ATM, Shields N and Taylor NF. Outcome measures in the management of proximal humeral fractures: A systematic review of their use and psychometric properties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011;20:333-43
4. Slobogean GP, Noonan VK and O'Brien PJ. The reliability and validity of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, EuroQol-5D, Health Utilities Index, and Short Form-6D outcome instruments in patients with proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010;19:342-8
5. Tingart M, Bathis H, Lefering R, et al. Constant-score and Neerscore. A comparison of score result and patients subjective assessment. [German]. Unfallchirurg 2001;104:1048-54. (Pubitemid 33081765
6. Baker P, Nanda R, Goodchild L, et al. A comparison of the Constant and Oxford shoulder scores in patients with conservatively treated proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17:37-41
7. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001
8. Bond TG and Fox CM. Applying the Rasch Model-fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2007
9. Brorson S, Olsen BS, Frich LH, et al. Effect of osteosynthesis, primary hemiarthroplasty, and non-surgical management for displaced four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly: A multi-centre, randomised clinical trial. Trials 2009;10:51
10. Bahrs C, Rolauffs B, Dietz K, et al. Clinical and radiological evaluation of minimally displaced proximal humeral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010;130:673-9
11. Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M and Leunig M. Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004;13:427-33. (Pubitemid 38844112
12. Neer 2nd CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970;52: 1077-89
13. Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P and Schatzker J. The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1990
14. Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1975;23:433-41
15. Walter SD, Eliasziw M and Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 1998;17:101-10. (Pubitemid 28020212
16. Hudak PL, Amadio PC and Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head). Am J Ind Med 1996;29:602-8. (Pubitemid 26172396
17. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R and Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:593-600. (Pubitemid 26241761
18. Bastian JD and Hertel R. Osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty of fractures of the proximal humerus: Outcomes in a consecutive case series. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009;18:216-19
19. Constant CR and Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 1987;214:160-4. (Pubitemid 17019681
20. Constant CR, Gerber C, Emery RJH, et al. A review of the constant score: Modifications and guidelines for its use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17:355-61
21. Ellman H, Hanker G and Bayer M. Repair of the rotator cuff. Endresult study of factors influencing reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68:1136-44. (Pubitemid 17178986
22. Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, et al. The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: A new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum 2003;49: 156-63. (Pubitemid 36418272
23. Fix A, Daughton D. Human activity profile professional manual. Odessa (FL): Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.; 1988
24. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol-A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199-208
25. Jaeschke R, Singer J and Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989;10:407-15
26. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Willan A and Griffith LE. Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol 1994;47:81-7. (Pubitemid 24034293
27. Angst F. The new COSMIN guidelines confront traditional concepts of responsiveness. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:152; author reply 152
28. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patientreported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:737-45
29. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2010;19:539-49
30. Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, et al. ICF linking rules: An update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:212-18. (Pubitemid 41025328
31. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1: 307-10. (Pubitemid 16134762
32. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 2003;41:582-92
33. Keating J, Matyas T. Unreliable inferences from reliable measurements. Aust J Physiother 1998;44:5-10. (Pubitemid 28156218
34. Franchignoni F, Giordano A, Sartorio F, et al. Suggestions for refinement of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH): A factor analysis and Rasch validation study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:1370-7
35. Gabel CP, Yelland M, Melloh M, Burkett B. A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009;10:161
36. Guyatt GH, Bombardier C, Tugwell PX. Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. CMAJ 1986;134:889-95. (Pubitemid 16013788
37. Lillkrona U. How should we use the constant score?. A commentary. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17:362-3
38. Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Constant-Murley score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010;19:157-64
39. Olerud P, Tidermark J, Ponzer S, et al. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D in patients with proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011;20:1200-6
40. Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: Longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003;4:11.