Comparative kinetics of hybrid and pure moving bed reactor-membrane bioreactors

Ecological Engineering

Volumn 70, Issue , 2014, Pages 227-234

  Leyva Diaz J C ^a   Martin Pascual J ^a   Munio M M ^a   Gonzalez Lopez J ^a   Hontoria, E ^a   Poyatos, J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Autotrophic kinetics; Biofilm; Moving bed biofilm reactor membrane bioreactor; Nitrogen removal; Wastewater treatment

Indexed keywords

BIOFILMS; BIOMASS; KINETICS; NITROGEN REMOVAL; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

AUTOTROPHIC BIOMASS; CONVENTIONAL MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; MOVING BED;

BIOREACTORS;

AUTOTROPHY; BIOFILM; BIOREACTOR; BIOTECHNOLOGY; ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING; MEMBRANE; NITROGEN; REACTION KINETICS; SEWAGE TREATMENT;

EID: 84902530555     PISSN: 09258574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.05.017     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ahl R.M., Leiknes T., Ødegaard H. Tracking particle size distributions in a moving bed biofilm membrane reactor for treatment of municipal wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 53(7):33-42.
2. APHA, AWWA, WEF Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2012, APHA, AWWA, WEF, Washington, DC, USA. 22nd ed.
3. Canziani R., Emondi V., Garavaglia M., Malpei F., Pasinetti E., Buttiglieri G. Effect of oxygen concentration on biological nitrification and microbial kinetics in a cross-flow membrane bioreactor (MBR) and moving-bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) treating old landfill leachate. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 286(1-2):202-212.
4. Chan Y.J., Chong M.F., Law C.L., Hassell D.G. A review on anaerobic-aerobic treatment of industrial and municipal wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 155:1-18.
5. De la Torre T., Rodríguez C., Gómez M.A., Alonso E., Malfeito J.J. The IFAS-MBR process: a compact combination of biofilm and MBR technology as RO pretreatment. Desalin. Water Treat. 2013, 51(4-6):1063-1069.
6. Di Trapani D., Mannina G., Torregrossa M., Viviani G. Hybrid moving bed biofilm reactors: a pilot plant experiment. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 57(10):1539-1545.
7. Di Trapani D., Mannina G., Torregrossa M., Viviani G. Comparison between hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor and activated sludge system: a pilot plant experiment. Water Sci. Technol. 2010, 61(4):891-902.
8. Falletti L., Conte L., Milan M. Nitrogen removal improvement in small wastewater treatment plants with hybrid and tertiary moving bed biofilm reactors. Proceedings of the Second IWA Specialized Conference, Nutrient Management in Wastewater Treatment Processes 2009, 803-810.
9. Gujer W., Henze M., Takahashi M., van Loosdrecht M.C.M. Activated sludge model no. 3. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 29(1):183-193.
10. Hasan S.W., Elektorowicz M., Oleszkiewicz J.A. Correlations between trans-membrane pressure (TMP) and sludge properties in submerged membrane electro-bioreactor (SMEBR) and conventional membrane bioreactor (MBR). Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 120:199-205.
11. Henze M., Grady C.P.L., Gujer W., Marais G.v.R., Matsuo T. Activated Sludge Model No. 1. IAWPRC Task Group on Mathematical Modelling for Design and Operation of Biological Wastewater Treatment, Scientific and Technical Report No. 1 1987.
12. Ivanovic I., Leiknes T. Impact of aeration rates on particle colloidal fraction in the biofilm membrane bioreactor (BF-MBR). Desalination 2008, 231:182-190.
13. Ji G., He C., Tan Y. The spatial distribution of nitrogen removal functional genes in multimedia biofilters for sewage treatment. Ecol. Eng. 2013, 55:35-42.
14. Juárez-Jiménez B., Reboleiro-Rivas P., González-López J., Pesciaroli C., Barghini P., Fenice M. Immobilization of Delftia tsuruhatensis in macro-porous cellulose and biodegradation of phenolic compounds in repeated batch process. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 157(1):148-153.
15. Judd S. The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors in Water and Wastewater Treatment 2006, Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, UK.
16. Kermani M., Bina B., Movahedian H., Amin M.M., Nikaeen M. Biological phosphorus and nitrogen removal from wastewater using moving bed biofilm process. Iran. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 7(1):19-27.
17. Le-Clech P., Chen V., Fane T.A. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:17-53.
18. Leiknes T., Ødegaard H. The development of a biofilm membrane bioreactor. Desalination 2007, 202:135-143.
19. Leyva-Díaz J.C., Calderón K., Rodríguez F.A., González-López J., Hontoria E., Poyatos J.M. Comparative kinetic study between moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor and membrane bioreactor systems and their influence on organic matter and nutrients removal. Biochem. Eng. J. 2013, 77:28-40.
20. Mannina G., Viviani G. Hybrid moving bed biofilm reactors: an effective solution for upgrading a large wastewater treatment plant. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 60(5):1103-1116.
21. Mannina G., Di Trapani D., Viviani G., Ødegaard H. Modeling and dynamic simulation of hybrid moving bed biofilm reactors: model concepts and application to a pilot plant. Biochem. Eng. J. 2011, 56:23-36.
22. Martín-Pascual J., López-López C., Cerdá A., González-López J., Hontoria E., Poyatos J.M. Comparative kinetic study of carrier type in a moving bed system applied to organic matter removal in urban wastewater treatment. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012, 223(4):1699-1712.
23. Metcalf E. Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse 2003, McGraw Hill, New York, NY.
24. Monod J. The growth of bacterial cultures. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1949, 3:371-394.
25. Ødegaard H. Advanced compact wastewater treatment based on coagulation and moving bed biofilm processes. Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 42(12):33-48.
26. Ødegaard H. Innovations in wastewater treatment: the moving bed bioreactor. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 53(9):17-33.
27. Petruccioli M., Piccioni P., Fenice M., Federici F. Glucose oxidase, catalase and gluconic acid production by immobilized mycelium of Penicillum variabile P16. Biotechnol. Lett. 1994, 16(9):939-942.
28. Plattes M., Fiorelli D., Gillé S., Girard C., Henry E., Minette F., O'Nagy O., Schosseler P.M. Modelling and dynamic simulation of a moving bed bioreactor using respirometry for the estimation of kinetic parameters. Biochem. Eng. J. 2007, 33:253-259.
29. Posmanik R., Gross A., Nejidat A. Effect of high ammonia loads emitted from poultry-manure digestion on nitrification activity and nitrifier-community structure in a compost biofilter. Ecol. Eng. 2014, 62:140-147.
30. Reboleiro-Rivas P., Martín-Pascual J., Juárez-Jiménez B., Poyatos J.M., Hontoria E., Rodelas B., González-López J. Enzymatic activities in a moving bed membrane bioreactor for real urban wastewater treatment: effect of operational conditions. Ecol. Eng. 2013, 61:23-33.
31. Rusten B., Hem L.J., Ødegaard H. Nitrification of municipal wastewater in moving-bed biofilm reactors. Water Environ. Res. 1995, 67(1):75-86.
32. Rutt K., Seda J., Johnson C.H. Two year case study of integrated fixed film activated sludge (IFAS) at Broomfield, CO WWTP. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation 2006, 225-239.
33. Seifi M., Fazaelipoor M.H. Modeling simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND) in a fluidized bed biofilm reactor. Appl. Math. Modell. 2012, 36:5603-5613.
34. Spanjers H., Vanrolleghem P.A., Olsson G., Dold P. Respirometry in Control of Activated Sludge Process: Principles 1998, IWA Publishing, London, UK.
35. Sriwiriyarat T., Randall C.W. Performance of IFAS wastewater treatment processes for biological phosphorus removal. Water Res. 2005, 39(16):3873-3884.
36. Valdivia A., Gonzalez-Martínez S., Wilderer P.A. Biological nitrogen removal with three different SBBR. Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 55(7):245-254.
37. Visvanathan C., Ben Aim R., Parameshwaran K. Membrane separation bioreactors for wastewater treatment. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 30(1):1-48.
38. Wang X.J., Xia S.Q., Chen L., Zhao J.F., Renault N.J., Chovelon J.M. Nutrients removal from municipal wastewater by chemical precipitation in a moving bed biofilm reactor. Process Biochem. 2006, 41(4):824-828.
39. Yang Q., Chen J., Zhang F. Membrane fouling control in a submerged membrane bioreactor with porous, flexible suspended carriers. Desalination 2006, 189:292-302.
40. Yang S., Yang F., Fu Z., Lei R. Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on organic carbon and nitrogen removal. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:2369-2374.
41. Zhou H., Smith D.W. Advanced technologies in water and wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2002, 1:247-264.