Impact of analysis of frozen-section margin on reoperation rates in women undergoing lumpectomy for breast cancer: Evaluation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data

Surgery (United States)

Volumn 156, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 190-197

  Boughey, Judy C ^a   Hieken, Tina J ^a   Jakub, James W ^a   Degnim, Amy C ^a   Grant, Clive S ^a   Farley, David R ^a   Thomsen, Kristine M ^a   Osborn, John B ^a   Keeney, Gary L ^a   Habermann, Elizabeth B ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; STEROID;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING DISORDER; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER PATIENT; CARCINOMA IN SITU; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CURRENT PROCEDURAL TERMINOLOGY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; FROZEN SECTION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYPERTENSION; ICD-9; IMPLANTABLE PORT SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; OVARIECTOMY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM EVALUATION; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; FROZEN SECTIONS; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84902526896     PISSN: 00396060     EISSN: 15327361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.025     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. L.E. McCahill, R.M. Single, and E.J. Aiello Bowles et al. Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery JAMA 307 2012 467 475
2. M. Singh, G. Singh, K.T. Hogan, K.A. Atkins, and A.T. Schroen The effect of intraoperative specimen inking on lumpectomy re-excision rates World J Surg Oncol 8 2010 4
3. J.A. Margenthaler, F. Gao, and V.S. Klimberg Margin index: a new method for prediction of residual disease after breast-conserving surgery Ann Surg Oncol 17 2010 2696 2701
4. G.C. Balch, S.K. Mithani, J.F. Simpson, and M.C. Kelley Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy Am Surg 71 2005 22 27 discussion 27-28
5. M. Thompson, R. Henry-Tillman, and A. Margulies et al. Hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided (HUG) breast lumpectomy Ann Surg Oncol 14 2007 148 156
6. L.B. Wilson A method for the rapid preparation of fresh tissues for the microscope JAMA 45 1905 1737
7. A.A. Gal The centennial anniversary of the frozen section technique at the Mayo Clinic Arch Pathol Lab Med 129 2005 1532 1535
8. J.A. Ferreiro, J.L. Myers, and D.G. Bostwick Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis in surgical pathology: review of a 1-year experience with 24,880 cases at Mayo Clinic Rochester Mayo Clin Proc 70 1995 1137 1141
9. J.B. Osborn, G.L. Keeney, J.W. Jakub, A.C. Degnim, and J.C. Boughey Cost-effectiveness analysis of routine frozen-section analysis of breast margins compared with reoperation for positive margins Ann Surg Oncol 18 2011 3204 3209
10. S.F. Khuri, J. Daley, and W. Henderson et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program Ann Surg 228 1998 491 507
11. ACS NSQIP Participant User Guide for the 2011 Participant Use Data File: October 2012. Available from: http://site.acsnsqip.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/ 03/2011-User-Guide-Final.pdf.
12. M. Morrow, J. White, and J. Moughan et al. Factors predicting the use of breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II breast carcinoma J Clin Oncol 19 2001 2254 2262
13. Surgeons ASoB. Image confirmation of successful excision of image-localized breast lesion. Available from: https://www.breastsurgeons.org/ statements/QM/ASBrS-Image-confirmation-of-successful-excision-of-image- localized-breast-lesion.pdf.
14. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Measure Codes. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment- Instruments/PQRS/MeasuresCodes.html.
15. J.H. Hughes, M.C. Mason, and R.J. Gray et al. A multi-site validation trial of radioactive seed localization as an alternative to wire localization Breast J 14 2008 153 157
16. P.J. Lovrics, C.H. Goldsmith, and N. Hodgson et al. A multicentered, randomized, controlled trial comparing radioguided seed localization to standard wire localization for nonpalpable, invasive and in situ breast carcinomas Ann Surg Oncol 18 2011 3407 3414
17. D.L. Eck, S.L. Koonce, and R.F. Goldberg et al. Breast surgery outcomes as quality measures according to the NSQIP database Ann Surg Oncol 19 2012 3212 3217
18. T. Schwartz, A.C. Degnim, and J. Landercasper Should re-excision lumpectomy rates be a quality measure in breast-conserving surgery? Ann Surg Oncol 20 2013 3180 3183
19. I. Pappo, R. Spector, and A. Schindel et al. Diagnostic performance of a novel device for real-time margin assessment in lumpectomy specimens J Surg Res 160 2010 277 281
20. N. Lue, J.W. Kang, and C.C. Yu et al. Portable optical fiber probe-based spectroscopic scanner for rapid cancer diagnosis: a new tool for intraoperative margin assessment PLoS ONE 7 2012 e30887
21. M.D. Keller, E. Vargis, and N. de Matos Granja et al. Development of a spatially offset Raman spectroscopy probe for breast tumor surgical margin evaluation J Biomed Opt 16 2011 077006
22. T.M. Bydlon, S.A. Kennedy, and L.M. Richards et al. Performance metrics of an optical spectral imaging system for intra-operative assessment of breast tumor margins Opt Express 18 2010 8058 8076
23. A. Taghian, M. Mohiuddin, R. Jagsi, S. Goldberg, E. Ceilley, and S. Powell Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy: results of a survey Ann Surg 241 2005 629 639
24. S.L. Blair, K. Thompson, J. Rococco, V. Malcarne, P.D. Beitsch, and D.W. Ollila Attaining negative margins in breast-conservation operations: is there a consensus among breast surgeons? J Am Coll Surg 209 2009 608 613
25. N. Cabioglu, K.K. Hunt, and A.A. Sahin et al. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery Ann Surg Oncol 14 2007 1458 1471
26. J.M. Jorns, D. Visscher, and M. Sabel et al. Intraoperative frozen section analysis of margins in breast conserving surgery significantly decreases reoperative rates: one-year experience at an ambulatory surgical center Am J Clin Pathol 138 2012 657 669
27. T.P. Olson, J. Harter, A. Munoz, D.M. Mahvi, and T. Breslin Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence Ann Surg Oncol 14 2007 2953 2960