Differences in cytogenetic sensitivity to ionizing radiation in newborns and adults

Radiation Research

Volumn 181, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 605-616

  Bakhmutsky, Marina V ^a   Joiner, Michael C ^a   Jones, Theodore B ^a   Tucker, James D ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHYTOHEMAGGLUTININ;

ADULT; AGED; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; BLOOD SAMPLING; CANCER RISK; CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY; CHROMOSOME DAMAGE; CHROMOSOME PAINTING; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOGENETICS; DICENTRIC CHROMOSOME; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; IONIZING RADIATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEWBORN; PERIPHERAL LYMPHOCYTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION HAZARD; RADIATION RESPONSE; RADIOSENSITIVITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SMOKING; STRUCTURAL CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; UMBILICAL CORD BLOOD; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; CELLS, CULTURED; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; INFANT, NEWBORN; LYMPHOCYTES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIATION TOLERANCE; RADIATION, IONIZING;

EID: 84902491321     PISSN: 00337587     EISSN: 19385404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1667/RR13598.1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Jones IM, Tucker JD, Langlois RG, Mendelsohn ML, Pleshanov P, Nelson DO. Evaluation of three somatic genetic biomarkers as indicators of low dose radiation effects in clean-up workers of the Chernobyl nuclear reactor accident. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2001; 97:61-7.
2. Tucker JD, Tawn EJ, Holdsworth D, Morris S, Langlois R, Ramsey MJ, et al. Biological dosimetry of radiation workers at the Sellafield nuclear facility. Radiat Res 1997; 148:216-26.
3. Ramsey MJ, Moore DH 2nd, Briner JF, Lee DA, Olsen L, Senft JR, et al. The effects of age and lifestyle factors on the accumulation of cytogenetic damage as measured by chromosome painting. Mutat Res 1995; 338:95-106.
4. Sigurdson AJ, Ha M, Hauptmann M, Bhatti P, Sram RJ, Beskid O, et al. International study of factors affecting human chromosome translocations. Mutat Res 2008; 652:112-21.
5. Soler D, Pampalona J, Tusell L, Genesca A. Radiation sensitivity increases with proliferation-associated telomere dysfunction in nontransformed human epithelial cells. Aging Cell 2009; 8:414-25.
6. Sabin RJ, Anderson RM. Cellular Senescence - its role in cancer and the response to ionizing radiation. Genome Integr 2011; 2:7.
7. Mladinic M, Kopjar N, Milic M, Dasovic AB, Huzak M, Zeljezic D. Genomic instability in a healthy elderly population: a pilot study of possible cytogenetic markers related to ageing. Mutagenesis 2010; 25:455-62.
8. Hagmar L, Bonassi S, Stromberg U, Brogger A, Knudsen LE, Norppa H, et al. Chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes predict human cancer: a report from the European Study Group on Cytogenetic Biomarkers and Health (ESCH). Cancer Res 1998; 58:4117-21.
9. Bonassi S, Norppa H, Ceppi M, Stromberg U, Vermeulen R, Znaor A, et al. Chromosomal aberration frequency in lymphocytes predicts the risk of cancer: results from a pooled cohort study of 22,358 subjects in 11 countries. Carcinogenesis 2008; 29:1178-83.
10. Pierce DA, Mendelsohn ML. A model for radiation-related cancer suggested by atomic bomb survivor data. Radiat Res 1999; 152:642-54.
11. Shah DJ, Sachs RK, Wilson DJ. Radiation-induced cancer: a modern view. Br J Radiol 2012; 85:e1166-73.
12. Shuryak I, Sachs RK, Brenner DJ. Cancer risks after radiation exposure in middle age. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102:1628-36.
13. Hattis D, Goble R, Russ A, Chu M, Ericson J. Age-related differences in susceptibility to carcinogenesis: a quantitative analysis of empirical animal bioassay data. Environ Health Perspect 2004; 112:1152-8.
14. Tucker JD. Chromosome translocations and assessing human exposure to adverse environmental agents. Environ Mol Mutagen 2010; 51:815-24.
15. Tucker JD, Morgan WF, Awa AA, Bauchinger M, Blakey D, Cornforth MN, et al. A proposed system for scoring structural aberrations detected by chromosome painting. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1995; 68:211-21.
16. Kleinerman RA. Cancer risks following diagnostic and therapeutic radiation exposure in children. Pediatr Radiol 2006; 36 Suppl 2:121-5.
17. Sadetzki S, Mandelzweig L. Childhood exposure to external ionising radiation and solid cancer risk. Br J Cancer 2009; 100:1021-5.
18. Schnarr K, Dayes I, Sathya J, Boreham D. Individual radiosensitivity and its relevance to health physics. Dose Response 2007; 5:333-48.
19. Schmitz S, Brzozowska K, Pinkawa M, Eble M, Kriehuber R. Chromosomal radiosensitivity analyzed by FISH in lymphocytes of prostate cancer patients and healthy donors. Radiat Res 2013; 180:465-73.
20. Ohtaki K, Kodama Y, Nakano M, Itoh M, Awa AA, Cologne J, et al. Human fetuses do not register chromosome damage inflicted by radiation exposure in lymphoid precursor cells except for a small but significant effect at low doses. Radiat Res 2004; 161:373-9.
21. Stephan G, Schneider K, Panzer W, Walsh L, Oestreicher U. Enhanced yield of chromosome aberrations after CT examinations in paediatric patients. Int J Radiat Biol 2007; 83:281-7.
22. Bennett LM, Wang Y, Ramsey MJ, Harger GF, Bigbee WL, Tucker JD. Cigarette smoking during pregnancy: Chromosome translocations and phenotypic susceptibility in mothers and newborns. Mutat Res 2010; 696:81-8.
23. Loucas BD, Durante M, Bailey SM, Cornforth MN. Chromosome damage in human cells by gamma rays, alpha particles and heavy ions: track interactions in basic dose-response relationships. Radiat Res 2013; 179:9-20.
24. Fineman J, Clyman R. Fetal cardiovascular physiology. In: Creasy RK, Resnik R, Iams J, editors. Maternal fetal medicine: Elsevier; 2004; 160-163.
25. Holmes DK, Bellantuono I, Walkinshaw SA, Alfirevic Z, Johnston TA, Subhedar NV, et al. Telomere length dynamics differ in foetal and early post-natal human leukocytes in a longitudinal study. Biogerontology 2009; 10:279-84.
26. Beck R, Lam-Po-Tang PR. Comparison of cord blood and adult blood lymphocyte normal ranges: a possible explanation for decreased severity of graft versus host disease after cord blood transplantation. Immunol Cell Biol 1994; 72:440-4.
27. Lopez MC, Palmer BE, Lawrence DA. Phenotypic differences between cord blood and adult peripheral blood. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 2009; 76:37-46.
28. Schwartz J, Gaulden M. The relative contributions of B and T lymphocytes in the human peripheral blood mutagen test system as determined by cell survival, mitogenic stimulation, and Induction of chromosome aberrations by radiation. Environ Mutagen 1980; 2:473-85.