Closed-loop decoder adaptation shapes neural plasticity for skillful neuroprosthetic control

Neuron

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1380-1393

  Orsborn, Amy L ^a   Moorman, Helene G ^b   Overduin, Simon A ^c   Shanechi, Maryam M ^c   Dimitrov, Dragan F ^d   Carmena, Jose M ^a,b,c  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CLOSED LOOP DECODER ADAPTATION ALGORITHM; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FEASIBILITY STUDY; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVE CONDUCTION; NEUROMODULATION; NEUROPROSTHESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RHESUS MONKEY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR SKILLS; NEURAL PROSTHESES; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; TEACH-BACK COMMUNICATION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84902456657     PISSN: 08966273     EISSN: 10974199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.04.048     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Carmena J.M. Advances in neuroprosthetic learning and control. PLoS Biol. 2013, 11:e1001561.
2. Carmena J.M., Lebedev M.A., Crist R.E., O'Doherty J.E., Santucci D.M., Dimitrov D.F., Patil P.G., Henriquez C.S., Nicolelis M.A.L. Learning to control a brain-machine interface for reaching and grasping by primates. PLoS Biol. 2003, 1:E42.
3. Chase S.M., Kass R.E., Schwartz A.B. Behavioral and neural correlates of visuomotor adaptation observed through a brain-computer interface in primary motor cortex. J.Neurophysiol. 2012, 108:624-644.
4. Chestek C.A., Gilja V., Nuyujukian P., Foster J.D., Fan J.M., Kaufman M.T., Churchland M.M., Rivera-Alvidrez Z., Cunningham J.P., Ryu S.I., Shenoy K.V. Long-term stability of neural prosthetic control signals from silicon cortical arrays in rhesus macaque motor cortex. J.Neural Eng. 2011, 8:045005.
5. Collinger J.L., Wodlinger B., Downey J.E., Wang W., Tyler-Kabara E.C., Weber D.J., McMorland A.J., Velliste M., Boninger M.L., Schwartz A.B. High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia. Lancet 2013, 381:557-564.
6. Dangi S., Orsborn A.L., Moorman H.G., Carmena J.M. Design and analysis of closed-loop decoder adaptation algorithms for brain-machine interfaces. Neural Comput. 2013, 25:1693-1731.
7. Danziger Z., Fishbach A., Mussa-Ivaldi F.A. Learning algorithms for human-machine interfaces. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2009, 56:1502-1511.
8. Fetz E.E. Volitional control of neural activity: implications for brain-computer interfaces. J.Physiol. 2007, 579:571-579.
9. Foldes S.T., Taylor D.M. Speaking and cognitive distractions during EEG-based brain control of a virtual neuroprosthesis-arm. J.Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2013, 10:116.
10. Ganguly K., Carmena J.M. Emergence of a stable cortical map for neuroprosthetic control. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7:e1000153.
11. Ganguly K., Dimitrov D.F., Wallis J.D., Carmena J.M. Reversible large-scale modification of cortical networks during neuroprosthetic control. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 14:662-667.
12. Georgopoulos A.P., Schwartz A.B., Kettner R.E. Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science 1986, 233:1416-1419.
13. Gilja V., Nuyujukian P., Chestek C.A., Cunningham J.P., Yu B.M., Fan J.M., Churchland M.M., Kaufman M.T., Kao J.C., Ryu S.I., Shenoy K.V. A high-performance neural prosthesis enabled by control algorithm design. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15:1752-1757.
14. Golub M.D., Yu B.M., Chase S.M. Internal models engaged by brain-computer interface control. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. 2012, 2012:1327-1330.
15. Green A.M., Kalaska J.F. Learning to move machines with the mind. Trends Neurosci. 2011, 34:61-75.
16. Hwang E.J., Bailey P.M., Andersen R.A. Volitional control of neural activity relies on the natural motor repertoire. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:353-361.
17. Jackson A., Fetz E.E. Interfacing with the computational brain. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2011, 19:534-541.
18. Jarosiewicz B., Chase S.M., Fraser G.W., Velliste M., Kass R.E., Schwartz A.B. Functional network reorganization during learning in a brain-computer interface paradigm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:19486-19491.
19. Jarosiewicz B., Masse N.Y., Bacher D., Cash S.S., Eskandar E., Friehs G., Donoghue J.P., Hochberg L.R. Advantages of closed-loop calibration in intracortical brain-computer interfaces for people with tetraplegia. J.Neural Eng. 2013, 10:046012.
20. Kim S.-P., Simeral J.D., Hochberg L.R., Donoghue J.P., Black M.J. Neural control of computer cursor velocity by decoding motor cortical spiking activity in humans with tetraplegia. J.Neural Eng. 2008, 5:455-476.
21. Koralek A.C., Jin X., Long J.D., Costa R.M., Carmena J.M. Corticostriatal plasticity is necessary for learning intentional neuroprosthetic skills. Nature 2012, 483:331-335.
22. Koralek A.C., Costa R.M., Carmena J.M. Temporally precise cell-specific coherence develops in corticostriatal networks during learning. Neuron 2013, 79:865-872.
23. Li Z., O'Doherty J.E., Lebedev M.A., Nicolelis M.A.L. Adaptive decoding for brain-machine interfaces through Bayesian parameter updates. Neural Comput. 2011, 23:3162-3204.
24. Merel, J., Fox, R., Jebara, T., and Paninski, L. (2013). A multi-agent control framework for co-adaptation in brain-computer interfaces. C.J.C. Burges, L. Bottou, Z. Ghahramani, and K.Q. Weinberger, eds. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2841-2849.
25. Musallam S., Corneil B.D., Greger B., Scherberger H., Andersen R.A. Cognitive control signals for neural prosthetics. Science 2004, 305:258-262.
26. Orsborn A.L., Dangi S., Moorman H.G., Carmena J.M. Closed-loop decoder adaptation on intermediate time-scales facilitates rapid BMI performance improvements independent of decoder initialization conditions. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2012, 20:468-477.
27. Shanechi M.M., Carmena J.M. Optimal feedback-controlled point process decoder for adaptation and assisted training in brain-machineinterfaces. 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Eng. 2013, 653-656.
28. Suminski A.J., Tkach D.C., Hatsopoulos N.G. Exploiting multiple sensory modalities in brain-machine interfaces. Neural Netw. 2009, 22:1224-1234.
29. Suminski A.J., Tkach D.C., Fagg A.H., Hatsopoulos N.G. Incorporating feedback from multiple sensory modalities enhances brain-machine interface control. J.Neurosci. 2010, 30:16777-16787.
30. Taylor D.M., Tillery S.I., Schwartz A.B. Direct cortical control of 3D neuroprosthetic devices. Science 2002, 296:1829-1832.
31. Velliste M., Perel S., Spalding M.C., Whitford A.S., Schwartz A.B. Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding. Nature 2008, 453:1098-1101.
32. Wander J.D., Blakely T., Miller K.J., Weaver K.E., Johnson L.A., Olson J.D., Fetz E.E., Rao R.P.N., Ojemann J.G. Distributed cortical adaptation during learning of a brain-computer interface task. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110:10818-10823.
33. Wu, W., Black, M.J., Gao, Y., Bienenstock, E., Serruya, M., Shaikhouni, A., and Donoghue, J.P. (2003). Neural decoding of cursor motion using a Kalman filter. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 133-140.