A simulation study on effects of exposure to a combination of pesticides used in an orchard and tuber crop on the recovery time of a vulnerable aquatic invertebrate

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1489-1498

  Focks, Andreas ^a   Luttik, Robert ^b   Zorn, Mathilde ^c   Brock, Theo ^a   Roex, Erwin ^d   Van der Linden, Ton ^b   Van Den Brink, Paul J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^c Board for the Authorisation of Plant Protection Products and Biocides   (Netherlands)

^d DELTARES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ecological risk assessment; Individual based modeling; Pesticide combinations; Recovery

Indexed keywords

CROPS; ORCHARDS; RECOVERY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES; ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT; EFFECTIVE CONCENTRATION; EXPOSURE CONCENTRATION; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODELING; PESTICIDE COMBINATIONS; SIMULATION STUDIES; SPECIES SENSITIVITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

PESTICIDE EFFECTS;

CYHALOTHRIN; PESTICIDE;

AQUATIC COMMUNITY; CROP PLANT; INVERTEBRATE; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; PESTICIDE; POLLUTION EFFECT; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; POPULATION MODELING; SIMULATION;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; AQUATIC SPECIES; ARTHROPOD; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROP; EFFECT SIZE; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; INVERTEBRATE; LONG TERM EXPOSURE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MORTALITY; NETHERLANDS; NONHUMAN; ORCHARD; PLANT TUBER; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION MODEL; POPULATION RECOVERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION;

NETHERLANDS;

ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODELING; PESTICIDE COMBINATIONS; RECOVERY;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NETHERLANDS; PESTICIDES; POPULATION DYNAMICS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84902436563     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: 15528618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etc.2502     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. European Commission. 2009. Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European parliament and the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC. Off J Eur Union L 309:1-50.
2. European Commission. 2011. Regulation (EC) No 546/2011 of June 2011 of the European parliament and the Council as regards uniform principles for authorisation of plant protection products. Off J Eur Union L 155:127-175.
3. European Food Safety Authority. 2010. Scientific opinion on the development of specific protection goal options for environmental risk assessment of pesticides, in particular in relation to the revision of the Guidance Documents on Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecotoxicology (SANCO/3268/2001 and SANCO/10329/2002). EFSA Journal 8:1821.
4. Hommen U, Baveco JM, Galic N, van den Brink PJ. 2010. Potential application of ecological models in the european environmental risk assessment of chemicals I: Review of protection goals in EU directives and regulations. Integr Environ Assess Manag 6:325-337.
5. Campbell P, Arnold D, Brock T, Grandy N, Heger W, Heimbach F, Maund S, Streloke M. 1999. HARAP Guidance Document: Higher-tier Aquatic Risk Assessment for Pesticides. SETAC-Europe, Brussels, Belgium.
6. Giddings JM, Brock TCM, Heger W, Heimbach F, Maund SJ, Norman SM, Ratte HT, Schafers C, Streloke M. eds. 2002. Community-Level Aquatic Systems Studies-Interpretation Studies: CLASSIC. SETAC Press, Pensacola, FL, USA.
7. European Food Safety Authority. 2013. Guidance document on tiered risk assessment for plant protection products for aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters. EFSA Journal 11:3290.
8. Van Den Brink PJ, Baveco JM, Verboom J, Heimbach F. 2007. An individual-based approach to model spatial population dynamics of invertebrates in aquatic ecosystems after pesticide contamination. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:2226-2236.
9. Aston RJ, Milner AGP. 1980. A comparison of populations of the isopod Asellus aquaticus above and below power stations in organically polluted reaches of the River Trent. Freshw Biol 10:1-14.
10. Murphy PM, Learner MA. 1982. The life history and production of Asellus aquaticus (Crustacea: Isopoda) in the River Ely, South Wales. Freshw Biol 12:435-444.
11. Økland KA. 1978. Life history and growth of Asellus aquaticus (L.) in relation to environment in a eutrophic lake in Norway. Hydrobiologia 59:243-259.
12. Galic N, Baveco H, Hengeveld GM, Thorbek P, Bruns E, Van Den Brink PJ. 2012. Simulating population recovery of an aquatic isopod: Effects of timing of stress and landscape structure. Environ Pollut 163:91-99.
13. Van der Linden A, Groenwold J, Kruijne R, Luttik R, Merkelbach R. 2008. Dutch environmental indicator for plant protection products, version 2. Input, calculation and aggregation procedures. Report 607600002. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
14. Spruijt J, Spoorenberg PM, Rovers JAJM, Slabbekoorn JJ, de Kool SAM, Vlaswinkel MET. 2010. Reducing environmental impact and costs of crop protection. WOT rapport 114. Statutory Research Task Unit for Nature and the Environment, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
15. Luttik R, Zorn M, Van der Brink PJ, Brock TCM, Roex E, Van der Linden AMA. 2013. Multiple stress by repeated use of plant protection products in agricultural areas. Report 601720001. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
16. Arts GH, Buijse-Bogdan LL, Belgers JD, van Rhenen-Kersten CH, van Wijngaarden RP, Roessink I, Maund SJ, van den Brink PJ, Brockt TC. 2006. Ecological impact in ditch mesocosms of simulated spray drift from a crop protection program for potatoes. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2:105-125.
17. Tiktak A, Adriaanse P, Boesten J, van Griethuysen C, Ter Horst M, Linders J, van der Linden A, van de Zande J. 2012. Scenarios for exposure of aquatic organisms to plant protection products in the Netherlands: Part 1: Field crops and downward spraying. Report 607407002. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
18. Tiktak A, Boesten J, Hendriks R, van der Linden A. 2012. Leaching of plant protection products to field ditches in the Netherlands: Development of a PEARL drain pipe scenario for arable land. Report 607407003. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
19. Meier U, ed. 2001. Growth Stages of Mono- and Dicotyledonous Plants, 2nd ed. BBCH Monograph. Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
20. Forum for the Co-ordination of Pesticide Fate Models and Their Use. 2003. FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios in the EU Evaluation Process under 91/414/EEC. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios, EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-Rev.1. Brussels Belgium.
21. Dorgelo F, ed. 2006. Eindrapportage CTBase. College voor de toelating van bestrijdingsmiddelen Ctgb, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
22. Adriaanse PI. 1996. Fate of pesticides in field ditches: The TOXSWA simulation model. DLO Winand Staring Centre for Integrate Land, Soil and Water Research. Report 90. Wageningen, The Netherlands.
23. Maltby L, Blake N, Brock TCM, Van Den Brink PJ. 2005. Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: Importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:379-388.
24. Maltby L, Brock TCM, Van Den Brink PJ. 2009. Fungicide risk assessment for aquatic ecosystems: Importance of interspecific variation, toxic mode of action, and exposure regime. Environ Sci Technol 43:7556-7563.
25. Van Vlaardingen P, Traas T, Wintersen A, Aldenberg T. 2004. ETX 2.0. A program to calculate hazardous concentrations and fraction affected, based on normality distributed toxicity data. Report 601501028. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
26. Rubach MN, Crum SJH, Van Den Brink PJ. 2011. Variability in the dynamics of mortality and immobility responses of freshwater arthropods exposed to chlorpyrifos. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 60:708-721.
27. Schroer AFW, Belgers JDM, Brock TCM, Matser AM, Maund SJ, Van Den Brink PJ. 2004. Comparison of Laboratory Single Species and Field Population-Level Effects of the Pyrethroid Insecticide λ-Cyhalothrin on Freshwater Invertebrates. Arch Environ Contamin Toxicol 46:324-335.
28. van Wijngaarden RPA, Arts GHP, Belgers JDM, Boonstra H, Roessink I, Schroer AFW, Brock TCM. 2010. The species sensitivity distribution approach compared to a microcosm study: A case study with the fungicide fluazinam. Ecotox Environ Saf 73:109-122.
29. European Commission. SCHER, SCCS, SCENIHR, Opinion on the Toxicity and Assessment of Chemical Mixtures. 2012. [cited May 17, 2013]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/environmental_risks/docs/scher_o_155.pdf.
30. G Tadini GV, Valentino F. 1969. Richerche sulla determinazione della stasi riproduttiva in varie razze geografiche di Asellus aquaticus (Crus. Isop). Atti Accad Naz Lincei Memorie 9:3-50.
31. Gore J, Kelly J, Yount J. 1990. Application of ecological theory to determining recovery potential of disturbed lotic ecosystems: research needs and priorities. Environ Manag 14:755-762.
32. Niemi GJ, DeVore P, Detenbeck N, Taylor D, Lima A, Pastor J, Yount JD, Naiman RJ. 1990. Overview of case studies on recovery of aquatic systems from disturbance. Environ Manag 14:571-587.
33. Galic N, Ashauer R, Baveco H, Nyman A-M, Barsi A, Thorbek P, Bruns E, Van den Brink PJ. Subm. 2014. Modelling the contribution of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic processes to the recovery of Gammarus pulex populations after exposure to pesticides. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:1476-1488 (this issue).
34. Van den Brink PJ, Baird DJ, Baveco HJ, Focks A. 2013. The use of traits-based approaches and eco (toxico)logical models to advance the ecological risk assessment framework for chemicals. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 9:e47-e57.
35. Jager T, Albert C, Preuss TG, Ashauer R. 2011. General unified threshold model of survival - A toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic framework for ecotoxicology. Environ Sci Tech 45:2529-2540.
36. Ashauer R, Boxall ABA, Brown CD. 2007. Simulating toxicity of carbaryl to Gammarus pulex after sequential pulsed exposure. Environ Sci Technol 41:5528-5534.
37. Ashauer R, Hintermeister A, Potthoff E, Escher BI. 2011. Acute toxicity of organic chemicals to Gammarus pulex correlates with sensitivity of Daphnia magna across most modes of action. Aquat Toxicol 103:38-45.
38. Kretschmann A, Ashauer R, Hollender J, Escher BI. 2012. Toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic model for diazinon toxicity-mechanistic explanation of differences in the sensitivity of Daphnia magna and Gammarus pulex. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:2014-2022.
39. Rubach MN, Baird DJ, Boerwinkel MC, Maund SJ, Roessink I, Van Den Brink PJ. 2012. Species traits as predictors for intrinsic sensitivity of aquatic invertebrates to the insecticide chlorpyrifos. Ecotoxicology 21:2088-2101.
40. Auber A, Roucaute M, Togola A, Caquet T. 2011. Structural and functional effects of conventional and low pesticide input crop-protection programs on benthic macroinvertebrate communities in outdoor pond mesocosms. Ecotoxicology 20:2042-2055.
41. Van Wijngaarden RPA, Cuppen JGM, Arts GHP, Crum SJH, Van Den Hoorn MW, Van Den Brink PJ, Brock TCM. 2004. Aquatic risk assessment of a realistic exposure to pesticides used in bulb crops: A microcosm study. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1479-1498.
42. Belden JB, Gilliom RJ, Martin JD, Lydy MJ. 2007. Relative toxicity and occurrence patterns of pesticide mixtures in streams draining agricultural watersheds dominated by corn and soybean production. Integr Environ Assess Manag, 3:90-100.
43. Liess M, Schulz R. 1999. Linking insecticide contamination and population response in an agricultural stream. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:1948-1955.
44. Verbruggen EMJ, Van den Brink PJ. 2010. Review of recent literature concerning mixture toxicity of pesticides to aquatic organisms. Report 601400001. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.