Influence of weight and structure on biological behavior of polypropylene mesh prostheses placed at the esophageal hiatus

Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 383-390

  Senft, Jonas ^a   Gehrig, Tobias ^a   Lasitschka, Felix ^a   Linke, Georg R ^a   Shevchenko, Maxym ^a   Bruckner, Thomas ^a   Kenngott, Hannes G ^a   Fischer, Lars ^a   Müller Stich, Beat P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN TYPE 1; COLLAGEN TYPE 3; POLYPROPYLENE; BIOMATERIAL;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FOREIGN BODY REACTION; HIATUS HERNIA; HISTOLOGY; INFLAMMATION; LOWER ESOPHAGUS SPHINCTER; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; NONHUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; POLYPROPYLENE MESH; POLYPROPYLENE MESH EROSION; POLYPROPYLENE MESH MIGRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPLEEN; SURGICAL MESH; TISSUE ADHESION; WEIGHT; WEIGHT GAIN; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANIMAL; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; HERNIA, HIATAL; MATERIALS TESTING; PIG;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; HERNIA, HIATAL; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYPROPYLENES; SURGICAL MESH; SWINE; TISSUE ADHESIONS;

EID: 84902343597     PISSN: 10926429     EISSN: 15579034     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2013.0588     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter JG, Brunt ML, Soper NJ, Sheppard BC, et al. Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: Long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg 2011;213:461-468.
2. Hashemi M, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Huprich JE, Quek M, Hagen JA, et al. Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: Objective followup reveals high recurrence rate. J Am Coll Surg 2000;190:553-560; discussion 560-561.
3. Kuster GG, Gilroy S. Laparoscopic technique for repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias. J Laparoendosc Surg 1993;3: 331-338.
4. Granderath FA, Schweiger UM, Kamolz T, Asche KU, Pointner R. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure reduces postoperative intrathoracic wrap herniation: Preliminary results of a prospective randomized functional and clinical study. Arch Surg 2005;140: 40-48.
5. Frantzides CT, Madan AK, Carlson MA, Stavropoulos GP. A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia. Arch Surg 2002;137:649-652.
6. Griffith PS, Valenti V, Qurashi K, Martinez-Isla A. Rejection of Goretex mesh used in prosthetic cruroplasty: A case series. Int J Surg 2008;6:106-109.
7. Stadlhuber RJ, Sherif AE, Mittal SK, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Michael Brunt L, Hunter JG, et al. Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: A 28-case series. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1219-1226.
8. Müller-Stich BP, Mehrabi A, Kenngott HG, Fonouni H, Reiter MA, Kuttymoratov G, et al. Is a circular polypropylene mesh appropriate for application at the esophageal hiatus? Results from an experimental study in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1372-1378.
9. Smith GS, Hazebroek EJ, Eckstein R, Berry H, Smith WM, Isaacson JR, et al. Evaluation of DualMesh for repair of large hiatus hernia in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 2008; 22:1625-1631.
10. Desai KM, Diaz S, Dorward IG, Winslow ER, La Regina MC, Halpin V, et al. Histologic results 1 year after bioprosthetic repair of paraesophageal hernia in a canine model. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1693-1697.
11. Jansen M, Otto J, Jansen PL, Anurov M, Titkova S, Willis S, et al. Mesh migration into the esophageal wall after mesh hiatoplasty: Comparison of two alloplastic materials. Surg Endosc 2007;21:2298-2303.
12. Otto J, Kämmer D, Jansen PL, Anurov M, Titkova S, Ottinger A, et al. Different tissue reaction of oesophagus and diaphragm after mesh hiatoplasty. Results of an animal study. BMC Surg 2008;8:7.
13. Klosterhalfen B, Junge K, Klinge U. The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair. Expert Rev Med Devices 2005;2:103-117.
14. Wolf I, Vetter M, Wegner I, Böttger T, Nolden M, Schö-binger M, et al. The Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit. Med Image Anal 2005;9:594-604.
15. Schreinemacher MHF, Emans PJ, Gijbels MJJ, Greve JWM, Beets GL, Bouvy ND. Degradation of mesh coatings and intraperitoneal adhesion formation in an experimental model. Br J Surg 2009;96:305-313.
16. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol 2008;20:86-100.
17. Harrell AG, Novitsky YW, Peindl RD, Cobb WS, Austin CE, Cristiano JA, et al. Prospective evaluation of adhesion formation and shrinkage of intra-abdominal prosthetics in a rabbit model. Am Surg 2006;72:808-813; discussion 813-814.
18. Scheidbach H, Tamme C, Tannapfel A, Lippert H, Köckerling F. In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties during endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: An experimental study in pigs. Surg Endosc 2004;18:211-220.
19. Junge K, Binnebösel M, Rosch R, Jansen M, Kämmer D, Otto J, et al. Adhesion formation of a polyvinylidenfluoride/polypropylene mesh for intra-abdominal placement in a rodent animal model. Surg Endosc 2009;23:327-333.
20. Hollinsky C, Sandberg S, Koch T, Seidler S. Biomechanical properties of lightweight versus heavyweight meshes for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and their impact on recurrence rates. Surg Endosc 2008;22:2679-2685.
21. Luijendijk RW, De Lange DC, Wauters CC, Hop WC, Duron JJ, Pailler JL, et al. Foreign material in postoperative adhesions. Ann Surg 1996;223:242-248.
22. Franz S, Rammelt S, Scharnweber D, Simon JC. Immune responses to implants-A review of the implications for the design of immunomodulatory biomaterials. Biomaterials 2011;32:6692-6709.
23. Hill LD. An effective operation for hiatal hernia: An eight year appraisal. Ann Surg 1967;166:681-692.
24. Zaninotto G, Portale G, Costantini M, Fiamingo P, Rampado S, Guirroli E, et al. Objective follow-up after laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia. Assessment of safety and durability. World J Surg 2007;31:2177-2183.
25. Müller-Stich BP, Köninger J, Müller-Stich BH, Schäfer F, Warschkow R, Mehrabi A, et al. Laparoscopic meshaugmented hiatoplasty as a method to treat gastroesophageal reflux without fundoplication: Single-center experience with 306 consecutive patients. Am J Surg 2009;198:17-24.
26. Gouvas N, Tsiaoussis J, Athanasakis E, Zervakis N, Pechlivanides G, Xynos E. Simple suture or prosthesis hiatal closure in laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia: A retrospective cohort study. Dis Esophagus 2011;24:69-78.
27. Shankaran V, Weber DJ, Reed RL 2nd, Luchette FA. A review of available prosthetics for ventral hernia repair. Ann Surg 2011;253:16-26.
28. Kielty CM, Grant ME. The Collagen Family: Structure Assembly and Organization in the Extracellular Matrix. New York: John Wiley, 2002, pp. 159-221.
29. Junge K, Klinge U, Rosch R, Mertens PR, Kirch J, Klosterhalfen B, et al. Decreased collagen type I/III ratio in patients with recurring hernia after implantation of alloplastic prostheses. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2004;389:17-22.
30. Ten Hallers EJO, Jansen JA, Marres HAM, Rakhorst G, Verkerke GJ. Histological assessment of titanium and polypropylene fiber mesh implantation with and without fibrin tissue glue. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;80:372-380.
31. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Mü ller M, Ottinger AP, Schumpelick V. Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: An experimental study in dogs. Eur J Surg 1998;164:965-969.