A comparison of the validity of two indirect utility instruments as measures of postoperative recovery

Journal of Surgical Research

Volumn 190, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 79-86

  Lee, Lawrence ^a   Mata, Juan ^a   Augustin, Berson R ^b   Carli, Franco ^b   Morin, Nancy ^c   Latimer, Eric ^d   Feldman, Liane S ^a  

^a Department of Surgery Steinberg Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Colorectal surgery; EQ 5d; Recovery; SF 6D; Utility; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADJUVANT THERAPY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CHARLSON COMORBIDITY INDEX; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLON RESECTION; COLORECTAL SURGERY; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EUROQOL 5D; FEMALE; HEMICOLECTOMY; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE RECONVALESCENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCTOCOLECTOMY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECTUM ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; RECTUM ANTERIOR RESECTION; RECTUM RESECTION; SHORT FORM 6D; SURGICAL MORTALITY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

COLORECTAL SURGERY; EQ-5D; RECOVERY; SF-6D; UTILITY; VALIDITY;

AGED; COLON; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PSYCHOMETRICS; RECTUM; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84902298006     PISSN: 00224804     EISSN: 10958673     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.02.016     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. S. Sinha, S. Sinha, E. Ashby, R. Jayaram, and M.P. Grocott Quality of reporting in randomized trials published in high-quality surgical journals J Am Coll Surg 209 2009 565
2. R.C. Martin 2nd, M.F. Brennan, and D.P. Jaques Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature Ann Surg 235 2002 803
3. A. Neville, L. Lee, and I. Antonescu et al. Systematic review of outcomes used to evaluate enhanced recovery after surgery Br J Surg 101 2014 159
4. L.B. Russell, M.R. Gold, J.E. Siegel, N. Daniels, and M.C. Weinstein The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine JAMA 276 1996 1172
5. J. Brazier, J. Roberts, and M. Deverill The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 J Health Econ 21 2002 271
6. P. Dolan Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states Med Care 35 1997 1095
7. T.H. Sach, G.R. Barton, and C. Jenkinson et al. Comparing cost-utility estimates: does the choice of EQ-5D or SF-6D matter? Med Care 47 2009 889
8. J. Brazier, and M. Deverill A checklist for judging preference-based measures of health related quality of life: learning from psychometrics Health Econ 8 1999 41
9. G.R. Barton, T.H. Sach, and A.J. Avery et al. Comparing the performance of the EQ-5D and SF-6D when measuring the benefits of alleviating knee pain Cost Eff Resour Alloc 7 2009 12
10. C.A. Marra, A.A. Rashidi, and D. Guh et al. Are indirect utility measures reliable and responsive in rheumatoid arthritis patients? Qual Life Res 14 2005 1333
11. L. Lee, N. Elfassy, and C. Li et al. Valuing postoperative recovery: validation of the SF-6D health-state utility J Surg Res 184 2013 108
12. P. Rasanen, E. Roine, and H. Sintonen et al. Use of quality-adjusted life years for the estimation of effectiveness of health care: a systematic literature review Int J Technol Assess Health Care 22 2006 235
13. M. Charlson, T.P. Szatrowski, J. Peterson, and J. Gold Validation of a combined comorbidity index J Clin Epidemiol 47 1994 1245
14. D. Dindo, N. Demartines, and P.A. Clavien Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey Ann Surg 240 2004 205
15. R.D. Hays, C.D. Sherbourne, and R.M. Mazel The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 Health Econ 2 1993 217
16. G. EuroQol EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life Health Policy 16 1990 199
17. J. Hanmer, W.F. Lawrence, J.P. Anderson, R.M. Kaplan, and D.G. Fryback Report of nationally representative values for the noninstitutionalized US adult population for 7 health-related quality-of-life scores Med Decis Making 26 2006 391
18. J.M. Bland, and D.G. Altman Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 1986 307
19. J.M. Bland, and D.G. Altman Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading Lancet 346 1995 1085
20. J. Cohen Statistical power for the behavioral sciences 1977 Academic Press New York
21. D. Rubin Multiple imputation for non response in surveys 1987 Wiley New York
22. L. Lee, T. Tran, N.E. Mayo, F. Carli, and L.S. Feldman What does it really mean to "recover" from an operation? Surgery 155 2014 211
23. S.J. Walters, and J.E. Brazier Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D Qual Life Res 14 2005 1523
24. M.F. Janssen, A.S. Pickard, and D. Golicki et al. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study Qual Life Res 22 2013 1717
25. S. Bryan, and L. Longworth Measuring health-related utility: why the disparity between EQ-5D and SF-6D? Eur J Health Econ 6 2005 253
26. R.H. Dworkin, D.C. Turk, and K.W. Wyrwich et al. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations J Pain 9 2008 105
27. S.J. Cano, and J.C. Hobart The problem with health measurement Patient Pref Adherence 5 2011 279
28. C. Jones, L. Kelliher, and M. Dickinson et al. Randomized clinical trial on enhanced recovery versus standard care following open liver resection Br J Surg 100 2013 1015
29. D.G. Whitehurst, S. Bryan, and M. Lewis Systematic review and empirical comparison of contemporaneous EQ-5D and SF-6D group mean scores Med Decis Making 31 2011 E34
30. J.C. Davis, T. Liu-Ambrose, K.M. Khan, M.C. Robertson, and C.A. Marra SF-6D and EQ-5D result in widely divergent incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in a clinical trial of older women: implications for health policy decisions Osteopor Int 23 2012 1849
31. S.A. Bartels, M.S. Vlug, D.T. Ubbink, and W.A. Bemelman Quality of life after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a systematic review World J Gastroenterol 16 2010 5035
32. T.R. Wilson, D.J. Alexander, and P. Kind Measurement of health-related quality of life in the early follow-up of colon and rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 49 2006 1692
33. J.A. Johnson, N. Luo, J.W. Shaw, P. Kind, and S.J. Coons Valuations of EQ-5D health states: are the United States and United Kingdom different? Med Care 43 2005 221