To cystoscope or not to cystoscope patients with traumatic spinal cord injuries managed with indwelling urethral or suprapubic catheters? That is the question

Spinal Cord

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 500-

  El Masri, W S ^a   Patil, S ^a,b   Prasanna, K V ^a   Chowdhury, J R ^a  

^a ROBERT JONES AND AGNES HUNT ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b CHAPEL ALLERTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMIC DYSREFLEXIA; BLADDER CANCER; BLADDER STONE; CYSTOSCOPY; HUMAN; INDWELLING CATHETER; LETTER; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SPASTICITY; SPINAL CORD INJURY; SUPRAPUBIC CATHETER; SUPRAPUBIC CATHETERIZATION; URETHRAL CATHETER; URETHRAL CATHETERIZATION; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; COMPLICATION; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS; URINARY CATHETER;

CATHETERS, INDWELLING; CYSTOSCOPY; HUMANS; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS; URINARY CATHETERS;

EID: 84902266200     PISSN: 13624393     EISSN: 14765624     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sc.2014.37     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Colgate C, Derry F, Allison HC, van Middendorp JJ. 'To cystoscope or not to cystoscope' Was that really the question? Spinal Cord 2014; 52: 499.
2. Miller A, Mitchell JP, Brown NJ. The Bristol Bladder Tumour Registry. Br J Urol 1969; 41 ( Suppl), 1-64.