Semi-automatic system for newborn hearing screening on electroaudiometro audix V;Sistema semi-automático para el pesquisaje auditivo en recién nacidos sobre el electroaudiometro Audix V

IFMBE Proceedings

Volumn 18, Issue , 2008, Pages 122-126

  Santos Febles, Elsa ^a   Perez Abalo M C ^a  

^a CENTRO DE NEUROCIENCIAS DE CUBA   (Cuba)

Author keywords

Auditory steady state response; Evoked potentials; Hearing loss; Hearing screening

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; BIOELECTRIC POTENTIALS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; WEB SERVICES;

HEARING IMPAIRMENTS; HEARING LOSS; HEARING SCREENING; INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT; SEMI-AUTOMATIC ALGORITHMS; SEMI-AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS; SPECIALIZED HARDWARE; STEADY-STATE RESPONSE;

AUDITION;

EID: 84902211638     PISSN: 16800737     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-74471-9_29     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. De Villiers, P.A. (1992). Educational implications of deafness: Language and literacy. In Eavey, R.D. Klein, J.O. (Eds.), Hearing Loss in Childhood: A Primer. Report of the 102nd Ross Conference on Pediatric Research (pp. 127-135). Columbus, OH: Ross Laboratories.
2. Pérez-Abalo, M.C. Gaya, J.A. Savio, G. Ponce de Leon, M. Perera, M, Reigosa, V. (2005). Early detection and intervention of hearing impairment in Cuba: Outcome after 20 years, Rev Neurol, 41, 556-563.Peters, J.G. (1986). An automated infant screener using advanced evoked response technology. Hear J, 39, 25-30.
3. Hall, J.W. Kileny, P.R. Ruth, R.A. Peters, K.J. (1987). Newborn auditory screening with Algo-I vs. conventional auditory brainstem response. Presented at the American Speech- Language- Hearing Association Meeting, New Orlans LA, 15-11.
4. Jacobson, J.T. Jacobson, C.A. Spahr, R.C. (1990). Automated and conventional ABR screening techniques in high-risk infants. J Am Acad Audiol, 1, 187-195.
5. Gravel J, Berg A, Bradley M, Cacace A, Campbell D, Dalzell L, DeCristofaro J, Greenberg E, Gross S, Orlando M, Pinheiro J, Regan J, Spivak L, Stevens F, Prieve B. (2000). New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: effects of screening protocol on inpatient outcome measures. Ear Hear, 21, 131-140.
6. Sohmer, H. Feinmesser, M. (1967). Cochlear action potentials recorded from the external ear in man. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 76, 427-436.
7. Jewett, D.l. Willinston, J.S. (1971). Auditory-evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans. Brain, 94, 681-96.
8. Kemp, D.T. (1978). Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am, 64, 1386-91.
9. Norton, S.J. Gorga, M.P. Widen, J.E. Folsom, R.C. Sininger, Y. Cone-Wesson, B. Vohr, B.R. Mascher, K. Fletcher, K. (2000). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Evaluation of transient evoked otoacustic emission, distortion product otoacustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance. Ear Hear, 21, 508-528.
10. Pérez-Abalo, M.C. Savio, G. Torres, A. Martin, V. Rodríguez, E. Galán, L. (2001). Steady state responses to multiple amplitude modulated tones: An optimized method to test frequency specific thresholds in hearing impaired children and normal subjects. Ear Hear, 22, 200-211.
11. Herdman, A.T., Stapells, D.R. (2003). Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments. International Journal of Audiology, 42, 237-248.
12. Savío, G. Cardenas, J. Pérez-Abalo, M.C. Gonzáles, A. Valdes, M.C. (2001). The low and high frequency auditory steady state responses mature at different rates. Audiology and Neurootology, 6, 279-287.
13. Luts, H. Desloovere, C. Wouters, J. (2006). Clinical application of dichotic multiple stimulus auditory steady state responses in high risk newborns and young children. Audiology and Neurotology, 11, 24-37.
14. Torres, A. Pérez-Abalo, M.C. Rioja, L. Rodríguez, E. De Armas, J.L. Eimil, E. Savio, G. Muxo, V. Martín, V. (2003). Nueva versión en Windows del sistema AUDIX para la evaluación objetiva de la audición. [enlinea]. Auditio: Revista electrónica de audiología. 1 Febrero 2003, vol. 2(1), pp. 3-9. (http://www.auditio.com/revista/pdf/vol2/1/020102.pdf)
15. Valdés, J.L. Pérez-Abalo, M.C. Martín, V. Savio, G. Sierra, C. Rodríguez, E. (1997). Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady state response. Ear Hear, 18, 420-429.
16. John, M.S., Dimitrijevic, A., Picton, T.W. (2002). Auditory steady-state responses to exponential modulation envelopes. Ear Hear, 23, 106-117.