The cross-country implications of alternative climate policies

Energy Policy

Volumn 72, Issue , 2014, Pages 155-163

  Li, Aijun ^a   Du, Nan ^a   Wei, Qian ^a  

^a SHANDONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Carbon leakages; Multilateral climate policies; Unilateral climate policies

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; EMISSION CONTROL;

CARBON EMISSION REDUCTIONS; CARBON EMISSIONS; CARBON LEAKAGE; CLIMATE POLICY; GLOBAL CARBON EMISSION; GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGES; GLOBAL CLIMATES; GLOBAL EMISSIONS;

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;

CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EMISSION CONTROL; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT; POLICY ANALYSIS; POLICY APPROACH;

EID: 84902184886     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Antimiani A., Costantini V., Martini C., Salvatici L., Tommasino M.C. Assessing alternative solutions to carbon leakage. Energy Econ. 2013, 36:299-311.
2. Babiker M.H. Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage. J. Int. Econ. 2005, 65:421-445.
3. Babiker M.H., Rutherford T.F. The economic effects of border measures in subglobal climate agreements. Energy J. 2005, 26(4):99-126.
4. Baylis K., Fullerton D., Karney D. Leakage, Welfare, and Cost-effectiveness of Carbon Policy (Working Paper) 2012, NBER, (Available from http://www.nber.org/papers/w18898).
5. 2 emissions: alternative policies. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1993, 24:258-271.
6. Böhringer C., Balistreri E.J., Rutherford T.F. The role of border carbon adjustment in unilateral climate policy: overview of an Energy Modeling Forum study (EMF 29). Energy Econ. 2012, 34:97-110.
7. Böhringer C., Carbone J.C., Rutherford T.F. Unilateral climate policy design: Efficiency and equity implications of alternative instruments to reduce carbon leakage. Energy Econ. 2012, 34:208-217.
8. Burniaux J-M., Martins J.O. Carbon leakages: a general equilibrium view. Econ. Theory 2012, 49:473-495.
9. Burniaux, J.M., Chanteau, J., Dellink, R., Duval, R., Jamet, S., 2009. The economics of climate change mitigation: how to build the necessary global action in a costeffective manner. Economics Department Working Papers, No. 701.
10. Caron J. Estimating carbon leakage and the efficiency of border adjustments in general equilibrium-Does sectoral aggregation matter?. Energy Econ. 2012, 34:111-126.
11. China CEIC Database, 2011. Available at (accessed 25.08.11.). http://site.securities.com/cdmWeb%20on%202011/08/25.
12. China Economic Information Network, 2013. Available at. http://db.cei.gov.cn/%3e%20on%202013/07/20.
13. Copeland B., Taylor M.S. Free trade and global warming: a trade theory view of the Kyoto protocol. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2005, 49:205-234.
14. Dong Y., Whalley J. How large are the impacts of carbon motivated border tax adjustments 2009, 15613. NBER, (Working Paper).
15. Elliott Joshua, Foster I.a.n., Kortum S.a.m., Munson Todd, Pérez Cervantes Fernando, Weisbach David Trade and carbon taxes. Am. Econ. Rev. 2010, 100:465-469.
16. 2 reductions and carbon leakage: the effect of international trade in oil and basic materials. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1993, 25:162-176.
17. Fischer C., Fox A.K. Climate policy and fiscal constraints: do tax interactions outweigh carbon leakage?. Energy Econ. 2012, 34:218-227.
18. Fischer C., Newell R. Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2008, 55:142-162.
19. Fullerton D., Karney D., Baylis K. Negative leakage (NBER Working Paper) 2011, (Available from http://www.nber.org/papers/w17001).
20. Gerlagh R., Kuik O.J. Carbon leakage with international technology spillovers. FEEM Nota di Lavoro 2007, 33.
21. Huang Y.N., Zhang W., Wang X.J. An econometric estimation and selection on the production function in an environmental CGE model. Acta Sci. Circumst. 2003, 23:350-354.
22. IEA, 2008. World Energy Outlook 2008, Paris.
23. IEA, 2009. World Energy Outlook 2009, Paris.
24. IEA, 2010. World Energy Outlook 2010, Paris.
25. IEA, 2012a. World energy outlook 2012, Paris.
26. IEA, 2012b. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2012 Edition, Paris.
27. Li A.J., Lin B.Q. Comparing climate policies to reduce carbon emissions in China. Energy Policy. 2013, 60:667-674.
28. Li A.J., Zhang A.Z. Will carbon motivated border tax adjustments function as a threat?. Energy Policy 2012, 47:81-90.
29. Li A.J., Zhang A.Z. Why are there large differences in performances when the same reductions are achieved in different countries? 2014, Working Paper of Shandong University.
30. Li A.J., Zhang A.Z., Cai H.B., Li X.F., Peng S.S. How large are the impacts of carbon motivated border tax adjustments on China and how to mitigate them?. Energy Policy 2013, 63:927-934.
31. Lin B.Q., Li A.J. Impacts of carbon motivated border tax adjustments on competitiveness across regions in China. Energy 2011, 36(8):5111-5118.
32. Lin B.Q., Li A.J. Impacts of removing fossil fuel subsidies on China: how large and how to mitigate?. Energy 2012, 44(1):741-749.
33. Maria Corrado, Di Werf, Edwin van der Carbon leakage revisited: unilateral climate policy with directed technical change. Environ. Res. Econ. 2008, 39:55-74.
34. Mattoo, A., Subranmanian, A., van der Mensbrugghe, D., He, J., 2009. Reconciling climate change and trade policy. World Bank Working Paper 09-15.
35. OECD Database, 2011. Available at. http://www.oecd.org/document/3/0,3343,en_2649_34445_38071427_1_1_1_1,00.html%20on%202011/09/20.
36. Pinto M.L., Harrison G.W. Multilateral negotiations over climate change policy. J. Policy Model. 2003, 25:911-930.
37. Rivers N. Impacts of climate policy on competitiveness of Canadian Industry: how big and how to mitigate?. Energy Econ. 2010, 32:1092-1104.
38. Sancho F. Calibration of CES functions for real-world multisectoral modeling. Econ. Syst. Res. 2009, 21(1):45-58.
39. 2 reductions and carbon leakage, the consequences of international trade in oil and basic materials. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1993, 25:162-176.
40. Tian, H.F., Shi, X.J., Whalley, J., 2012. Cross country fairness considerations and country implications of alternative approaches to a global emission reduction regime. Working Paper of NBER, No. 18443, Available from:. http://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/18443.html.
41. UNCOMTRADE Database, 2011. Available at (accessed 20.07.11.). http://data.un.org/Default.aspx%20on%202011/07/20.
42. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Handbook of Statistics 2009, United Nations Publication, New York and Geneva.
43. Whalley, J., 2011. What role for trade in a post 2012 global climate policy regime. Working Paper of NBER, No. 17498. Available from. http://www.nber.org/papers/w17498.
44. World Bank World Development Indicators 2009 2009, Published by the Green Press, Washington, DC.
45. World Bank, 2010. World Development Indicators 2010, Washington, DC.
46. World Bank, 2012. World Development Indicators 2012, Washington, DC.
47. Zhang, Z.X., 2009. Multilateral trade measures in a post-2012 climate change regime? What can be taken from the Montreal Protocol and the WTO? Energy Policy. 37, pp. 5105-5112.