Dealing with the effects of sensor displacement in wearable activity recognition

Sensors (Switzerland)

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 9995-10023

  Banos, Oresti ^a   Toth, Mate Attila ^b   Damas, Miguel ^a   Pomares, Hector ^a   Rojas, Ignacio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

Activity recognition; Human behavior inference; Inertial sensing; Real world; Sensor displacement; Sensor fusion; Wearable sensors

Indexed keywords

PATTERN RECOGNITION;

ACTIVITY RECOGNITION; HUMAN BEHAVIORS; INERTIAL SENSING; REAL-WORLD; SENSOR DISPLACEMENT; SENSOR FUSION; WEARABLE SENSORS;

SENSORS;

EID: 84902161665     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s140609995     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ermes, M.; Parkka, J.; Mantyjarvi, J.; Korhonen, I. Detection of daily activities and sports with wearable sensors in controlled and uncontrolled conditions. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2008, 12, 20-26.
2. Stiefmeier, T.; Roggen, D.; Ogris, G.; Lukowicz, P.; Tröster, G. Wearable activity tracking in car manufacturing. IEEE Pervas. Comput. 2008, 7, 42-50.
3. Chernbumroong, S.; Atkins, A.; Yu, H. Activity classification using a single wrist-worn accelerometer. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Software, Knowledge Information, Industrial Management and Applications, Benevento, Italy, 8-11 Spetember 2011; pp. 1-6.
4. Mannini, A.; Intille, S.S.; Rosenberger, M.; Sabatini, A.M.; Haskell, W. Activity recognition using a single accelerometer placed at the wrist or ankle. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2013, 45, 2193-2203.
5. Atallah, L.; Lo, B.; King, R.; Yang, G.Z. Sensorpositioning for activity recognition using wearable accelerometers. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 2011, 5, 320-329.
6. Roggen, D.; Foerster, K.; Calatroni, A.; Bulling, A.; Troester, G. On the issue of variability in labels and sensor configurations in activity recognition systems. In Proceedings of the Best Practice in Activity Recognition Workshop at the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Zurich, Switzerland, 1 December 2010; pp. 1-4.
7. Harms, H.; Amft, O.; Tröster, G. Influence of a loose-fitting sensing garment on posture recognition in rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference, Baltimore, MD, USA, 20-22 November 2008; pp. 353-356.
8. Kunze, K.; Lukowicz, P. Dealing with sensor displacement in motion-based onbody activity recognition systems. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Seoul, Korea, 18-22 June 2008; pp. 20-29.
9. Förster, K.; Brem, P.; Roggen, D.; Troster, G. Evolving discriminative features robust to sensor displacement for activity recognition in body area sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing, Melbourne, Australia, 7-10 December 2009; pp. 43-48.
10. Gao, L.; Bourke, A.K.; Nelson, J. A system for activity recognition using multi-sensor fusion. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Boston, MA, USA, 30 August-3 September 2011; pp. 7869-7872.
11. Jiang, M.; Shang, H.; Wang, Z.; Li, H.; Wang, Y. A method to deal with installation errors of wearable accelerometers for human activity recognition. Physiol. Meas. 2011, 32, 347-358.
12. Wu, X.; Wang, Y.; Chien, C.; Pottie, G. Self-calibration of sensor misplacement based on motion signatures. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Body Sensor Networks, Cambridge, MA, USA, 6-9 May 2013; pp. 1-5.
13. Kale, N.; Lee, J.; Lotfian, R.; Jafari, R. Impact of sensor misplacement on dynamic time warping based human activity recognition using wearable computers. In Proceedings of the Conference on Wireless Health, La Jolla, CA, USA, 22-25 October 2012; pp. 1-8.
14. Steinhoff, U.; Schiele, B. Dead reckoning from the pocket-An experimental study. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, Mannheim, Germany, 29 March-2 April 2010; pp. 162-170.
15. Bayati, H.; del R Millan, J.; Chavarriaga, R. Unsupervised adaptation to on-body sensor displacement in acceleration-based activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Symposium on Wearable Computers, San Francisco, CA, USA, 12-15 June 2011; pp.71-78.
16. Chavarriaga, R.; Bayati, H.; del R Millan, J. Unsupervised adaptation for acceleration-based activity recognition: Robustness to sensor displacement and rotation. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 2012, 17, 479-490.
17. Sugiyama, M.; Krauledat, M.; Müller, K.R. Covariate shift adaptation by importance weighted cross validation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2007, 8, 985-1005.
18. Förster, K.; Roggen, D.; Tröster, G. Unsupervised classifier self-calibration through repeated context occurences: Is there robustness against sensor displacement to gain? In Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Symposium onWearable Computers, Linz, Austria, 4-7 September 2009; pp. 77-84.
19. Zappi, P.; Stiefmeier, T.; Farella, E.; Roggen, D.; Benini, L.; Troster, G. Activity recognition from on-body sensors by classifier fusion: Sensor scalability and robustness. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information, Melbourne, Qld., Austria, 3-6 December 2007; pp. 281-286.
20. Sagha, H.; Millan, J.D.R.; Chavarriaga, R. Detecting and rectifying anomalies in Opportunistic sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems, Dallas, TX, USA, 23-25 May 2011; pp. 162-167.
21. Sagha, H.; Bayati, H.; del R Millan, J.; Chavarriaga, R. On-line anomaly detection and resilience in classifier ensembles. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2013, 34, 1916-1927.
22. Banos, O.; Damas, M.; Pomares, H.; Rojas, I. On the use of sensor fusion to reduce the impact of use of sensor fusion to reduce the impact of rotational and additive noise in human activity recognition. Sensors 2012, 12, 8039-8054.
23. Bao, L.; Intille, S.S. Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. Pervasive Comput. 2004, 23, 1-17.
24. De la Torre, F.; Hodgins, J.; Montano, J.; Valcarcel, S.; Forcada, R.; Macey, J. Guide to the Carnegie Mellon University Multimodal Activity (cmu-mmac) Dataset; Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-08-22; Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2009.
25. Frank, K.; Vera, M.J.; Robertson, P.; Pfeifer, T. Bayesian recognition of motion related activities with inertial sensors. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Copenhagen, Denmark, 26-29 September 2010; pp. 445-446.
26. Yang, X.; Jin, L. A naturalistic 3D acceleration-based activity dataset and benchmark evaluations. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics, Istanbul, Turkey, 10-13 Octember 2010; pp. 4081-4085.
27. Reiss, A.; Stricker, D. Creating and benchmarking a new dataset for physical activity monitoring. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, Crete, Greece, 6-8 June 2012; pp. 40:1-40:8.
28. Banos, O.; Damas, M.; Pomares, H.; Rojas, I.; Toth, M.A.; Amft, O. A benchmark dataset to evaluate sensor displacement in activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 5-8 September 2012; pp. 1026-1035.
29. REALDISP dataset. Available online: http://www.ugr.es/oresti/datasets (accessed on 12 May 2014).
30. Xsens Technologies B.V. XM-B Technical Documentation, 2009. Available online: http://www.xsens.com (accessed on 12 May 2014).
31. Bannach, D.; Amft, O.; Lukowicz, P. Rapid prototyping of activity recognition applications. IEEE Pervas. Comput. 2008, 7, 22-31.
32. Roggen, D.; Magnenat, S.; Waibel, M.; Tröster, G. Wearable computing: Designing and sharing activity-recognition systems across platforms. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 2011, 18, 83-95.
33. Najafi, B.; Aminian, K.; Paraschiv-Ionescu, A.; Loew, F.; Bula, C.J.; Robert, P. Ambulatory system for human motion analysis using a kinematic sensor: Monitoring of daily physical activity in the elderly. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2003, 50, 711-723.
34. Selles, R.; Formanoy, M.; Bussmann, J.; Janssens, P.; Stam, H. Automated estimation of initial and terminal contact timing using accelerometers; development and validation in transtibial amputees and controls. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2005, 13, 81-88.
35. Banos, O.; Galvez, J.M.; Damas, M.; Pomares, H.; Rojas, I. Window size impact in human activity recognition. Sensors 2014, 14, 6474-6499.
36. Mathie, M.J.; Coster, A.C.F.; Lovell, N.H.; Celler, B.G. Accelerometry: Providing an integrated, practical method for long-term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement. Physiol. Meas. 2004, 25, 1-20.
37. Maurer, U.; Smailagic, A.; Siewiorek, D.P.; Deisher, M. Activity recognition and monitoring using multiple sensors on different body positions. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, Cambridge, MA, USA, 3-5 April 2006; pp. 113-116.
38. Ravi, N.; Mysore, P.; Littman, M.L. Activity recognition from accelerometer data. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 9-13 July 2005; pp. 1541-1546.
39. Banos, O.; Damas, M.; Pomares, H.; Prieto, A.; Rojas, I. Daily living activity recognition based on statistical feature quality group selection. Exp. Syst. Appl. 2012, 39, 8013-8021.
40. Mäntyjärvi, J.; Himberg, J.; Seppanen, T. Recognizing human motion with multiple acceleration sensors. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Tucson, AZ, USA, 7-10 October 2001; pp. 747-752.
41. Pirttikangas, S.; Fujinami, K.; Seppanen, T. Feature selection and activity recognition from wearable sensors. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium Ubiquitous Computing Systems, Seoul, Korea, 11-13 October 2006; pp. 516-527.
42. Preece, S.J.; Goulermas, J.Y.; Kenney, L.P.J.; Howard, D.; Meijer, K.; Crompton, R. Activity identification using body-mounted sensors-a review of classification techniques. Physiol. Meas. 2009, 30, 1-33.
43. Lara, O.D.; Labrador, M.A. A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2013, 15, 1192-1209.
44. Adidas®. Available online: http://micoach.adidas.com/ (accessed on 12 May 2014).
45. Nike®. Available online: http://nikeplus.nike.com/plus/products/sport watch/ (accessed on 12 May 2014).
46. Jawbone®. Available online: https://jawbone.com/up/international (accessed on 12 May 2014).
47. Hidalgo®. Available online: http://www.equivital.co.uk/products/tnr/sense-and-transmit (accessed on 12 May 2014).
48. UnderArmour®. Available online: http://www.underarmour.com/shop/us/en/armour39 (accessed on 12 May 2014).
49. Fitbit®. Available online: http://www.fitbit.com/es/store (accessed on 12 May 2014).
50. Fu, Y.; Cao, L.; Guo, G.; Huang, T.S. Multiple feature fusion by subspace learning. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Content-based Image and Video Retrieval, Niagara Falls, Canada, 7-9 July 2008; pp. 127-134.
51. Banos, O.; Damas, M.; Pomares, H.; Rojas, F.; Delgado-Marquez, B.; Valenzuela, O. Human activity recognition based on a sensor weighting hierarchical classifier. Soft Comput. 2013, 17, 333-343.
52. Kern, N.; Schiele, B.; Schmidt, A. Multi-sensor activity context detection for wearable computing. In Proceedings of the European Symposium on Ambient Intelligence, Veldhoven, The Netherlands, 3-4 November 2003; pp. 220-232.
53. Figo, D.; Diniz, P.C.; Ferreira, D.R.; Cardoso, J.M.P. Preprocessing techniques for context recognition from accelerometer data. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2010, 14, 645-662.
54. Kwapisz, J.R.; Weiss, G.M.; Moore, S.A. Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Diego, CA, USA, 21-24 August 2011; pp. 74-82.
55. Duda, R.O.; Hart, P.E.; Stork, D.G. Pattern Classification, 2nd ed.;Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2000.
56. Cover, T.M.; Hart, P.E. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1967, 13, 21-27.
57. Theodoridis, S.; Koutroumbas, K. Pattern Recognition, 4th ed.; Academic Press: Waltham, MA, USA, 2008.
58. Banos, O.; Calatroni, A.; Damas, M.; Pomares, H.; Rojas, I.; Sagha, H.; del R Millan, J.; Troster, G.; Chavarriaga, R.; et al. Kinect=IMU? Learning MIMO signal mappings to automatically translate activity recognition systems across sensor modalities. In Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC), Newcastle, UK, 18-22 June 2012; pp. 92-99.
59. Stone, M. Asymptotics for and against cross-validation. Biometrika 1977, 64, 29-35.