Self-report of tobacco use status: Comparison of paper-based questionnaire, online questionnaire, and direct face-to-face interview - implications for meaningful use

Population Health Management

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 185-189

  Steffen, Mark W ^a   Murad, Mohammad Hassan ^a   Hays, J Taylor ^a   Newcomb, Richard D ^a   Molella, Robin G ^a   Cha, Stephen S ^a   Hagen, Philip T ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EVALUATION STUDY; FACE TO FACE STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; FEMALE; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEANINGFUL USE CRITERIA; ONLINE QUESTIONNAIRE; PAPER BASED QUESTIONNAIRE; PATIENT SELECTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SELF REPORT; SMOKING; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; INTERVIEW; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TOBACCO USE; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MEANINGFUL USE; MIDDLE AGED; MINNESOTA; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SELF REPORT; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TOBACCO USE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84902142330     PISSN: 19427891     EISSN: 19427905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/pop.2013.0051     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program: Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements Overview, 2010. Available at: http://www .cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/ EHRIncentivePrograms/ Downloads/MU-Stage1-ReqOverview .pdf . Accessed June 7, 2012.
2. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program FAQs. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and- Guidance/ Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/downloads/FAQs RemediatedandRevised. pdf . Accessed June 7, 2012.
3. Terry K. Meaningful Use can cost millions, even after EHR purchase. Available at: http://www.fiercehealthit.com/ story/meaningful-use-can-cost- millions-even-after-ehr-purchase/ 2011-10-27. Accessed June 7, 2012.
4. Hagen PT, Turner D, Daniels L, Joyce D. Very large-scale distributed scanning solution for automated entry of patient information. In: TEPR (Toward an Electronic Patient Record) 98, Proceedings Manual. San Antonio, TX: Medical Records Institute, 1998:228-232.
5. Wood DL, Brennan MD, Chaudhry R, et al. Standardized care processes to improve quality and safety of patient care in a large academic practice: the Plummer Project of the Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic. Health Serv Manage Res 2008;21:276-280.
6. Hagen PT, Bond AR, Rehman H, Molella RG, Murad MH. Have you had a tetanus booster in the last 10 years? Sensitivity and specificity of the question. Patient Educ Couns 2008;70:403-406.
7. Lim LS, Williams DE, Hagen PT. Validation of a five-point self-rated stress score. Am J Health Promot 2005;19: 438-441.
8. From Attebring M, Herlitz J, Berndt AK, Karlsson T, Hjalmarson A. Are patients truthful about their smoking habits? A validation of self-report about smoking cessation with biochemical markers of smoking activity amongst patients with ischaemic heart disease. J Intern Med 2001; 249:145-151.
9. Yeager DS, Krosnick JA. The validity of self-reported nicotine product use in the 2001-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Med Care 2010;48:1128-1132.
10. Fournier L, Kovess V. A comparison of mail and telephone interview strategies for mental health surveys. Can J Psychiatry 1993;38:525-533.
11. Gmel G. The effect of mode of data collection and of nonresponse on reported alcohol consumption: a split-sample study in Switzerland. Addiction 2000;95:123-134.
12. Beebe TJ, McRae JA Jr, Harrison PA, Davern ME, Quinlan KB. Mail surveys resulted in more reports of substance use than telephone surveys. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:421-424.
13. Harmon T, Turner CF, Rogers SM, et al. Impact of TACASI on survey measurements of subjective phenomena. Public Opin Q 2009;73(2):255-280.
14. Turner CF, Villarroel MA, Rogers SM, et al. Reducing bias in telephone survey estimates of the prevalence of drug use: a randomized trial of telephone audio-CASI. Addiction 2005;100:1432-1444.
15. Newman JC, Des Jarlais DC, Turner CF, Gribble J, Cooley P, Paone D. The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. Am J Public Health 2002;92: 294-297.
16. Metzger DS, Koblin B, Turner C, et al. Randomized controlled trial of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: utility and acceptability in longitudinal studies. HIVNET Vaccine Preparedness Study Protocol Team. Am J Epidemiol 2000;152:99-106.
17. Rogers SM, Willis G, Al-Tayyib A, et al. Audio computer assisted interviewing to measure HIV risk behaviours in a clinic population. Sex Transm Infect 2005;81:501-507.
18. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. EHR Incentive Programs. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/ Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/ EHRIncentive Programs/index.html?redirect = /EHRIncentivePrograms . Accessed July 26, 2013.