Hybrid Monte Carlo with non-uniform step size

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 140, Issue 4, 2014, Pages

  Holzgräfe, Christian ^a   Bhattacherjee, Arnab ^a,b   Irbäck, Anders ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EQUATIONS OF MOTION; INTEGRATION; NUMERICAL METHODS;

HARMONIC OSCILLATORS; HYBRID MONTE CARLO; HYBRID MONTE-CARLO METHODS; LENNARD-JONES SYSTEMS; NUMBER OF INTEGRATIONS; NUMERICAL INTEGRATIONS; PERCENTAGE POINTS; TRAJECTORY LENGTH;

MONTE CARLO METHODS;

EID: 84902137001     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.4862687     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. A. R. Leach, Molecular Modelling: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed. (Prentice Hall, 2001).
2. S. Duane, A. D. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth, Phys. Lett. B 195, 216 (1987). 10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X
3. M. Creutz, Phys. Rev. D 38, 1228 (1988). 10.1103/PhysRevD.38.1228
4. S. Gupta, Nucl. Phys. B 370, 741 (1992). 10.1016/0550-3213(92)90429-F
5. A. D. Kennedy and B. Pendleton, Nucl. Phys. B 607, 456 (2001). 10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00129-8
6. H. Meyer, H. Simma, R. Sommer, M. Della Morte, O. Witzel, and U. Wolff, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176, 91 (2007). 10.1016/j.cpc.2006.08.002
7. G. G. Batrouni, G. R. Katz, A. S. Kronfeld, G. P. Lepage, B. Svetitsky, and K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 32, 2736 (1985). 10.1103/PhysRevD.32.2736
8. D. A. Sivak, J. D. Chodera, and G. E. Crooks, Phys. Rev. X 3, 011007 (2013). 10.1103/PhysRevX.3.011007
9. A. Bhattacherjee and S. Wallin, Biophys. J. 102, 569 (2012). 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.12.008
10. M. Creutz and A. Gocksch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 9 (1989). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.9
11. M. Campostrini and P. Rossi, Nucl. Phys. B 329, 753 (1990). 10.1016/0550-3213(90)90081-N
12. E. Forest and R. D. Ruth, Physica D 43, 105 (1990). 10.1016/0167-2789(90) 90019-L
13. H. Yoshida, Phys. Lett. A 150, 262 (1990). 10.1016/0375-9601(90)90092-3
14. I. P. Omelyan, I. M. Mryglod, and R. Folk, Phys. Rev. E 65, 056706 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.056706
15. T. Takaishi and P. de Forcrand, Phys. Rev. E 73, 036706 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.036706
16. C. Predescu, R. A. Lippert, M. P. Eastwood, D. Ierardi, H. Xu, M. Ø. Jensen, K. J. Bowers, J. Gullingsrud, C. A. Rendleman, R. O. Dror, and D. E. Shaw, Mol. Phys. 110, 967 (2012). 10.1080/00268976.2012.681311
17. M. Tuckerman, B. J. Berne, and G. J. Martyna, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 1990 (1992). 10.1063/1.463137
18. J. C. Sexton and D. H. Weingarten, Nucl. Phys. B 380, 665 (1992). 10.1016/0550-3213(92)90263-B
19. S. J. Stuart, R. Zhou, and B. J. Berne, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 1426 (1996). 10.1063/1.472005
20. R. D. Engle, R. D. Skeel, and M. Drees, J. Comput. Phys. 206, 432 (2005). 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.12.009
21. C. R. Sweet, S. S. Hampton, R. D. Skeel, and J. A. Izaguirre, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 174106 (2009). 10.1063/1.3253687
22. A. M. Horowitz, Phys. Lett. B 268, 247 (1991). 10.1016/0370-2693(91) 90812-5
23. E. Akhmatskaya, N. Bou-Rabee, and S. Reich, J. Comput. Phys. 228, 2256 (2009). 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.12.014
24. J. A. Wagoner and V. S. Pande, J. Chem. Phys. 137, 214105 (2012). 10.1063/1.4769301
25. B. Mehlig, D. W. Heermann, and B. M. Forrest, Phys. Rev. B 45, 679 (1992). 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.679
26. D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulations: From Algorithms to Applications, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, 2002).
27. See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4862687 E-JCPSA6-140-060404 for three figures showing additional results from the simulations of the Lennard-Jones system, a table showing acceptance rates in the peptide simulations, and a description of the peptide model.