Influence of the timing of administration of crystalloid on maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: Preload versus coload

BMC Anesthesiology

Volumn 14, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Oh, Ah Young ^a,b   Hwang, Jung Won ^a,b   Song, In Ae ^b   Kim, Mi Hyun ^c   Ryu, Jung Hee ^a,b   Park, Hee Pyoung ^a   Jeon, Yeong Tae ^a,b   Do, Sang Hwan ^a,b  

^a Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Bundang Hospital   (South Korea)

^c The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Cesarean delivery; Crystalloid; Hypotension; Spinal anesthesia

Indexed keywords

EPHEDRINE; INFUSION FLUID; CRYSTALLOID; ISOTONIC SOLUTION;

ABDOMINAL CIRCUMFERENCE; ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS; APGAR SCORE; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS; BLOOD PRESSURE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS OUTCOME; HEART RATE; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; MATERNAL HYPOTENSION; NAUSEA; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; TIME TO TREATMENT; UMBILICAL CORD BLOOD; VASODILATATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG EFFECTS; INTRASPINAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROCEDURES; TIME;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA, SPINAL; APGAR SCORE; BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS; BLOOD PRESSURE; CESAREAN SECTION; EPHEDRINE; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; HYPOTENSION; INFANT, NEWBORN; INJECTIONS, SPINAL; ISOTONIC SOLUTIONS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84902128806     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712253     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-36     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Birnbach DJ, Browne IM. Anesthesia for Obstetrics. Miller's Anesthesia. Volume 2 2010, 2203-2240. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, Miller RD, 7.
2. Cyna AM, Andrew M, Emmett RS, Middleton P, Simmons SW. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006, 4:CD002251.
3. Siddik-Sayyid SM, Nasr VG, Taha SK, Zbeide RA, Shehade JM, Al Alami AA, Mokadem FH, Abdallah FW, Baraka AS, Aouad MT. A randomized trial comparing colloid preload to coload during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2009, 109(4):1219-1224. 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181b2bd6b, 19641050.
4. Nishikawa K, Yokoyama N, Saito S, Goto F. Comparison of effects of rapid colloid loading before and after spinal anesthesia on maternal hemodynamics and neonatal outcomes in cesarean section. J Clin Monit Comput 2007, 21(2):125-129. 10.1007/s10877-006-9066-4, 17265094.
5. Teoh WH, Sia AT. Colloid preload versus coload for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: the effects on maternal cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2009, 108(5):1592-1598. 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819e016d, 19372341.
6. Rout CC, Rocke DA, Levin J, Gouws E, Reddy D. A reevaluation of the role of crystalloid preload in the prevention of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Anesthesiology 1993, 79(2):262-269. 10.1097/00000542-199308000-00011, 8192733.
7. Jackson R, Reid JA, Thorburn J. Volume preloading is not essential to prevent spinal-induced hypotension at caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 1995, 75(3):262-265. 10.1093/bja/75.3.262, 7547039.
8. Tamilselvan P, Fernando R, Bray J, Sodhi M, Columb M. The effects of crystalloid and colloid preload on cardiac output in the parturient undergoing planned cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a randomized trial. Anesth Analg 2009, 109(6):1916-1921. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181bbfdf6, 19923521.
9. Madi-Jebara S, Ghosn A, Sleilaty G, Richa F, Cherfane A, Haddad F, Yazigi A, Antakly MC. Prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (Voluven) versus lactated Ringer's solution. J Med Liban 2008, 56(4):203-207.
10. Banerjee A, Stocche RM, Angle P, Halpern SH. Preload or coload for spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 2010, 57(1):24-31. 10.1007/s12630-009-9206-7, 19859776.
11. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2007, 106(4):843-863. 10.1097/01.anes.0000264744.63275.10, 17413923, American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia.
12. Ueyama H, He YL, Tanigami H, Mashimo T, Yoshiya I. Effects of crystalloid and colloid preload on blood volume in the parturient undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section. Anesthesiology 1999, 91(6):1571-1576. 10.1097/00000542-199912000-00006, 10598596.
13. Dyer RA, Farina Z, Joubert IA, Du Toit P, Meyer M, Torr G, Wells K, James MF. Crystalloid preload versus rapid crystalloid administration after induction of spinal anaesthesia (coload) for elective caesarean section. Anaesth Intensive Care 2004, 32(3):351-357.
14. Riley ET, Cohen SE, Rubenstein AJ, Flanagan B. Prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: six percent hetastarch versus lactated Ringer's solution. Anesth Analg 1995, 81(4):838-842.
15. Ngan Kee WD. Prevention of maternal hypotension after regional anaesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2010, 23(3):304-309. 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328337ffc6, 20173633.
16. Allen TK, Muir HA, George RB, Habib AS. A survey of the management of spinal-induced hypotension for scheduled cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth 2009, 18(4):356-361. 10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.03.014, 19734039.