Soil moisture assessed by digital mapping techniques and its field validation;Umidade do solo obtida por técnicas de mapeamento digital e sua validação de campo

Ciencia e Agrotecnologia

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 140-148

  Silva, Bruno Mantoani ^a   Silva, Sérgio Henrique Godinho ^a   Oliveira, Geraldo Cesár de ^a   Peters, Petrus Hubertus Caspar Rosa ^a   Santos, Walbert Júnior Reis dos ^b   Curi, Nilton ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF LAVRAS   (Brazil)

^b Unidade de Desenvolvimento Territorial Companhia de Desenvolvimento dos Vales do São Francisco e do Parnaíba CODEVASF   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Relief; Soil water content determination; Terrain attributes; Water dynamics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902119103     PISSN: 14137054     EISSN: 19811829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1413-70542014000200005     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BEVEN, K.J.; KIRKBY, M.J. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Science Bulletin, 24:43-69, 1979.
2. BEVEN, K.; WOOD, E.F. Catchment geomorphology and the dynamics of runoff contributing areas. Journal of Hydrology, 65(1):139-158, 1983.
3. BÖHNER, J.; CONRAD, O. System for Automated Geoscientifc Analyses (SAGA) 2.0.5. Available in: http://sourceforge.net/projects/saga-gis/fles/. Accessed on: Feb. 20th, 2012. 2009.
4. BÖHNER, J. et al. Soil Regionalisation by means of terrain analysis and process parameterisation. In: MICHELI, E.; NACHTERGAELE, F.; MONTANARELLA, L. (Eds): Soil Classifcation 2001. Joint Research Centre, Ispra, p.213-222, 2002.
5. EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA-EMBRAPA. Sistema Brasileiro de Classifcacäo de Solos. 3.ed. Rio de Janeiro, 2013. 353 p.
6. FLORINSKY, I.V.; KURYAKOVA, G.A. Determination of grid size for digital terrain modelling in landscape investigations-Exemplifed by soil moisture distribution at a micro-scale. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14(8):15-832, 2000.
7. GHIBERTO, PJ. et al. Components of the water balance in soil with sugarcane crops. Agricultural Water Management, 102(1):1-7, 2011.
8. GRABS, T. et al. Modeling spatial patterns of saturated areas: A comparison of the topographic wetness index and a dynamic distributed model. Journal of Hydrology, 373:15-23, 2009.
9. HENGL, T. Finding the right pixel size. Computer & Geosciences, 32(9):1283-1298, 2006.
10. HU, W. et al. Watershed scale temporal stability of soil water content. Geoderma, 158(3-4):181-198, 2010.
11. LAGACHERIE, P.; MCBRATNEY, A.B. Spatial soil information systems and spatial soil inference systems: perspectives for digital soil mapping. In: LAGACHERIE, P.; MCBRATNEY, A.B.; VOLTZ, M. (Eds). Digital soil mapping: an introductory perspective. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v.1, p.3-24, 2007.
12. MCBRATNEY, A.B.; Mendonça-Santos, M. De L.; MINASNY, B. On digital soil mapping. Geoderma, 117:3-52, 2003.
13. MENEZES, M. D. Levantamento pedológico de hortos forestais e mapeamento digital de atributos físicos do solo para estudos hidrológicos. 2011. Available at: http://bdtd.ufa.br/tde_busca/processaPesquisa.php?processar=Processar. Accessed on: Jun. 20th, 2013.
14. PETERS, P.H.C.R. et al. Acurácia e calibração de sonda de capacitância em Argissolo Vermelho-Amarelo. 2013. Available at:http://www.cbcs2013.com.br/anais/ arquivos/2609.pdf. Accessed on: Sep. 10th 2013.
15. PILESJÖ, P.; PERSSON, A.; HARRIE, L. Digital elevation data for estimation of potential wetness in ridged fields-Comparison of two different methods. Agricultural Water Management, 79:225-247, 2006.
16. PINHEIRO, H.S.K. et al. Modelos de elevação para obtenção de atributos topográfcos utilizados em mapeamento digital de solos. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 47(9):1384-1394, 2012.
17. REICHARDT, K.; TIMM, L.C. Solo, planta e atmosfera: conceitos, processos e aplicações. Barueri: Manole, 2012. 524p.
18. SERAFIM, M.E. et al. Disponibilidade hídrica e distinção de ambientes para cultivo de cafeeiros. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 17(4):362-370, 2013.
19. SHARMA, A.; TIWARI, K.N.; BHADORIA, P.B.S. Determining the optimum cell size of digital elevation model for hydrologic application. Journal of Earth System Science, 120(4):573-582, 2011.
20. STEIN, A.; RILEY, J.; HALBERG, N. Issues of scale for environmental indicators. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 87(2):215-232, 2001
21. SUMFLETH, K.; DUTTMANN, R. Prediction of soil property distribution in paddy soil landscape using terrain data and satellite information as indicators. Ecological Indicators, 8(5):485-501, 2008.
22. THOMPSON, J.; BELL, J.; BUTLER, C. Digital elevation model resolution: effects on terrain attribute calculation and quantitative soil-landscape modeling. Geoderma, 100:67-89, 2001.
23. WEIHUA, Z.; MONTGOMERY, D. Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations. Water Resources Research, 30(4):1019-1028, 1994.
24. WILSON, J.P.; REPETTO, P.L.; SNYDER, R.D. Effect of data source, grid resolution and fow-routing method on computed topographic attributes. In: WILSON J.P.; GALLANT J.C. (Eds). Terrain Analysis: Principles and Applications. John Wiley & Sons: New York: p.133-161, 2000.
25. WOLOCK, D.M.; PRICE, C.V. Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography based watershed model. Water Resources Research, 30:3041-3052, 1994.
26. ZHANG, W.; MONTGOMERY, D.R. Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrological simulations. Water Resources Research, 30:1019-1028, 1994.
27. ZINKO, U. et al. Plant species numbers predicted by a topography based groundwater-fow index. Ecosystems, 8:430-441, 2005.