The impact of land use on the mussel Margaritifera margaritifera and its host fish Salmo trutta

Hydrobiologia

Volumn 735, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 213-220

  Österling, Martin ^a   Högberg, Jan Olov ^a  

^a KARLSTAD UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Clear cut; Landscape; Margaritifera margaritifera; Riparian forest; Salmo trutta; Sedimentation

Indexed keywords

BIVALVE; CLEARCUTTING; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; HABITAT QUALITY; HOST; LAND USE; POPULATION DENSITY; RECRUITMENT (POPULATION DYNAMICS); RIPARIAN FOREST; SALMONID; SEDIMENTATION; WATER QUALITY;

MARGARITIFERA MARGARITIFERA; SALMO TRUTTA; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 84902014424     PISSN: 00188158     EISSN: 15735117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-013-1501-1     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Agren, A. & S. Lofgren, 2012. pH sensitivity of Swedish forest streams related to catchment characteristics and geographical location - implications for forest bioenergy harvest and ash return. Forest Ecology and Management 276: 10-23.
2. Allan, J. D., 1995. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
3. Allan, J., 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: The influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 35: 257-284.
4. Arvidsson, B. L., J. Karlsson & M. E. Österling, 2012. Recruitment of the threatened mussel Margaritifera margaritifera in relation to mussel population size, mussel density and host density. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 22: 526-532.
5. Ashmore, P., F. M. Conly, D. deBoer, Y. Martin, E. Petticrew, A. Roy, 2000. Recent (1995-1998) Canadian research on contemporary processes of river erosion and sedimentation, and river mechanics. Hydrological Processes 14(9): 1687-1706.
6. Bauer, G., 1987a. Reproductive strategy of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera. Journal of Animal Ecology 56: 691-704.
7. Bauer, G., 1987b. The parasitic stage of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.) 3. Host relationships. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 76: 413-423.
8. Bauer, G., 1987c. The parasitic stage of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.) 2. Susceptibility of brown trout. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 76: 403-412.
9. Bauer, G. & C. Vogel, 1987. The parasitic stage of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.) 1. Host response to glochidiosis. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 76: 393-402.
10. Bogan, A. E., 1993. Fresh-water bivalve extinctions (Mollusca, Unionoida) - a search for causes. American Zoologist 33: 599-609.
11. Bohlin, T., S. Hamrin, T. G. Heggberget, G. Rasmussen & S. J. Saltveit, 1989. Electrofishing - theory and practice with special emphasis on salmonids. Hydrobiologia 173: 621-630.
12. Boulton, A. J., 2007. Hyporheic rehabilitation in rivers: restoring vertical connectivity. Freshwater Biology 52 (4): 632-650.
13. Box, J. B. & J. Mossa, 1999. Sediment, land use, and freshwater mussels: prospects and problems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18: 99-117.
14. Cosgrove, P. J. & L. C. Hastie, 2001. Conservation of threatened freshwater pearl mussel populations: river management, mussel translocation and conflict resolution. Biological Conservation 99: 183-190.
15. Dale, V., S. Brown, R. Haeuber, N. Hobbs, N. Huntly, R. Naiman, W. Riebsame, M. Turner & T. Valone, 2000. Ecological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land. Ecological Applications 10: 639-670.
16. Eriksson, M. O. G., L. Henriksson & H. Soderberg, 1998. The freshwater pearl mussel in Sweden. The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 4887: 1-66.
17. Eros, T., P. Gustafsson, L. A. Greenberg & E. Bergman, 2012. Forest-stream linkages: effects of terrestrial invertebrate input and light on diet and growth of brown trout (Salmo trutta) in a boreal forest stream. PloS ONE 7: e36462.
18. Geist, J., 2011. Integrative freshwater ecology and biodiversity conservation. Ecological Indicators 11: 1507-1516.
19. Geist, J. & K. Auerswald, 2007. Physicochemical stream bed characteristics and recruitment of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera). Freshwater Biology 52: 2299-2316.
20. Hastie, L. C. & M. R. Young, 2001. Freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) glochidiosis in wild and farmed salmonid stocks in Scotland. Hydrobiologia 445: 109-119.
21. Hastie, L. C., P. J. Boon & M. R. Young, 2000. Physical microhabitat requirements of freshwater pearl mussels, Margaritifera margaritifera (L.). Hydrobiologia 429: 59-71.
22. Holopainen, A. & P. Huttunen, 1992. Effects of forest clear-cutting and soil disturbance on the biology of small forest brooks. Hydrobiologia 243: 457-464.
23. Hutchens, J. J. Jr., J. A. Schuldt, C. Richards, L. B. Johnson, G. E. Host & D. H. Breneman, 2009. Multi-scale mechanistic indicators of Midwestern USA stream macroinvertebrates. Ecological Indicators 9: 1138-1150.
24. Jones, J. A., F. J. Swanson, B. C. Wemple & K. U. Snyder, 2000. Effects of roads on hydrology, geomorphology, and disturbance patches in stream networks. Conservation Biology 14: 76-85.
25. Kaase, C. T. & G. L. Katz, 2012. Effects of stream restoration on woody riparian vegetation of Southern Appalachian Mountain Streams, North Carolina, USA. Restoration Ecology 20: 647-655.
26. Li, F., N. Chung, M. Bae, Y. Kwon & Y. Park, 2012. Relationships between stream macroinvertebrates and environmental variables at multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biology 57: 2107-2124.
27. Lydeard, C., R. H. Cowie, W. F. Ponder, A. E. Bogan, P. Bouchet, S. A. Clark, K. S. Cummings, T. J. Frest, O. Gargominy, D. G. Herbert, R. Hershler, K. E. Perez, B. Roth, M. Seddon, E. E. Strong & F. G. Thompson, 2004. The global decline of nonmarine mollusks. Bioscience 54: 321-330.
28. Nurnberg, G. & M. Shaw, 1998. Productivity of clear and humic lakes: nutrients, phytoplankton, bacteria. Hydrobiologia 382: 97-112.
29. Österling, M. E., 2011. Test and application of a non-destructive photo-method investigating the parasitic stage of the threatened mussel Margaritifera margaritifera on its host fish Salmo trutta. Biological Conservation 144: 2984-2990.
30. Österling, M., E. Bergman, L. Greenberg, B. S. Baldwin & E. L. Mills, 2007. Turbidity-mediated interactions between invasive filter-feeding mussels and native bioturbating mayflies. Freshwater Biology 52: 1602-1610.
31. Österling, E. M., L. A. Greenberg & B. A. Arvidsson, 2008. Relationship of biotic and abiotic factors to recruitment patterns in Margaritifera margaritifera. Biological Conservation 141: 1365-1370.
32. Österling, M. E., B. L. Arvidsson & L. A. Greenberg, 2010. Habitat degradation and the decline of the threatened mussel Margaritifera margaritifera: influence of turbidity and sedimentation on the mussel and its host. Journal of Applied Ecology 47: 759-768.
33. Richards, C. & G. Host, 1994. Examining land-use influences on stream habitats and macroinvertebrates - a GIS approach. Water Resources Bulletin 30: 729-738.
34. Salemi, L. F., J. D. Groppo, R. Trevisan, J. M. de Moraes, W. de Paula Lima & L. A. Martinelli, 2012. Riparian vegetation and water yield: a synthesis. Journal of Hydrology 454: 195-202.
35. Sirombra, M. G. & L. M. Mesa, 2012. A method for assessing the ecological quality of riparian forests in subtropical Andean streams: QBRy index. Ecological Indicators 20: 324-331.
36. Strayer, D. L., 2008. Freshwater Mussel Ecology. A Multifactor Approach to Mussel Distribution and Abundance. University of California Press, Berkeley.
37. Strayer, D. L., J. A. Downing, W. R. Haag, T. L. King, J. B. Layzer, T. J. Newton & S. J. Nichols, 2004. Changing perspectives on pearly mussels, North America's most imperiled animals. Bioscience 54: 429-439.
38. Wood, P. J. & P. D. Armitage, 1997. Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environmental Management 21: 203-217.
39. Wyzga, B., J. Zawiejska, A. Radecki-Pawlik & H. Hajdukiewicz, 2012. Environmental change, hydromorphological reference conditions and the restoration of Polish Carpathian rivers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 37: 1213-1226.
40. Young, M. R., P. J. Cosgrove & L. C. Hastie, 2001. The Extent of, and Causes for, the Decline of a Highly Threatened Naiad: Margaritifera margaritifera. In Bauer, G. & K. Wächtler (eds), Ecology and Evolution of the Freshwater Mussels Unionoida. Ecological Studies, Vol. 145. Springer, Berlin: 337-357.