Public acceptability of population-level interventions to reduce alcohol consumption: A discrete choice experiment

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 113, Issue , 2014, Pages 104-109

  Pechey, Rachel ^a   Burge, Peter ^b   Mentzakis, Emmanouil ^c   Suhrcke, Marc ^a,d   Marteau, Theresa M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Alcohol; Health policy; Public acceptability; UK

Indexed keywords

ADVERTISING; ALCOHOL; CRIME; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; DRINKING; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HEALTH POLICY;

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CONTROL; CRIME; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; EFFECT SIZE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; POPULATION RESEARCH; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM; ADOLESCENT; ADVERTIZING; ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLIC OPINION; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; YOUNG ADULT;

UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMMERCE; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLIC OPINION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84902013324     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: 18735347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bloomfield K., Grittner U., Kramer S., Gmel G. Social inequalities in alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems in the study countries of the EU concerted action 'gender, culture and alcohol problems: a multinational study'. Alcohol Alcohol. 2006, 41:i26-i36.
2. Bongers I.M.B., Van de Goor I.A.M., Garretsen H.F.L. Social climate on alcohol in Rotterdam, the Netherlands: public opinion on drinking behaviour and alcohol control measures. Alcohol Alcohol. 1998, 33:141-150.
3. Diepeveen S., Ling T., Suhrcke M., Roland M., Marteau T.M. Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Publ. Health 2013, 13:756.
4. Erskine S., Maheswaran R., Pearson T., Gleeson D. Socioeconomic deprivation, urban-rural location and alcohol-related mortality in England and Wales. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:99.
5. Giesbrecht N., Ialomiteanu A., Anglin L., Adlaf E. Alcohol marketing and retailing: public opinion and recent policy developments in Canada. J.Subst. Use 2007, 12:389-404.
6. Greenfield T.K., Ye Y., Giesbrecht N. Alcohol policy opinions in the United States over a 15-year period of dynamic per capita consumption changes: implications for today's public health practice. Contemp. Drug. Probs. 2007, 34:649.
7. Health and Social Care Information Centre Statistics on Alcohol: England, 2012 2012, Health and Social Care Information Centre, Leeds.
8. Holmila M., Mustonen H., Österberg E., Raitasalo K. Public opinion and community-based prevention of alcohol-related harms. Addict. Res. Theory 2009, 17:360-371.
9. Jackson R., Johnson M., Campbell F., Messina J., Guillaume L., Meier P.S., et al. Interventions on Control of Alcohol Price, Promotion and Availability for Prevention of Alcohol Use Disorders in Adults and Young People 2010, The University of Sheffield, for NICE Centre for Public Health Excellence, London.
10. Lonsdale A., Hardcastle S., Hagger M. Aminimum price per unit of alcohol: a focus group study to investigate public opinion concerning UK government proposals to introduce new price controls to curb alcohol consumption. BMC Publ. Health 2012, 12:1023.
11. Mohapatra S., Patra J., Popova S., Duhig A., Rehm J. Social cost of heavy drinking and alcohol dependence in high-income countries. Int. J. Public Health 2010, 55:149-157.
12. NICE Alcohol-use Disorders: Preventing Harmful Drinking 2010, NICE Public Health Guidance, London, UK.
13. Promberger M., Dolan P., Marteau T.M. "Pay them if it works": discrete choice experiments on the acceptability of financial incentives to change health related behaviour. Soc. Sci. Med. 2012, 75:2509-2514.
14. Purshouse R.C., Brennan A., Latimer N., Meng Y., Rafia R., Jackson R., et al. Modelling to Assess the Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Public Health Related Strategies and Intervention to Reduce Alcohol Attributable Harm in England Using the Sheffield Alcohol Policy Model Version 2.0 2009, University of Sheffield, (Report to the NICE Public Health Programme Development Group).
15. Purshouse R.C., Meier P.S., Brennan A., Taylor K.B., Rafia R. Estimated effect of alcohol pricing policies on health and health economic outcomes in England: an epidemiological model. Lancet 2010, 375:1355-1364.
16. Ryan M. Discrete choice experiments in health care. BMJ 2004, 328:360-361.
17. UK Government Safe, Sensible, Social. The Next Steps in the National Alcohol Strategy 2007, UK Government, London, UK.
18. WHO Regional Office for Europe Evidence for the Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Interventions to Reduce Alcohol-related Harm 2009, World Health Organisation, Copenhagen.
19. Wilkinson C., Room R., Livingston M. Mapping Australian public opinion on alcohol policies in the new millennium. Drug. Alcohol Rev. 2009, 28:263-274.