A Dynamic microtubule cytoskeleton directs medial actomyosin function during tube formation

Developmental Cell

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 562-576

  Booth, Alexander J R ^a,c   Blanchard, Guy B ^b   Adams, Richard J ^b   Röper, Katja ^a  

^a MRC LABORATORY OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MYOSIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; ALPHA TUBULIN; BETA GALACTOSIDASE; F ACTIN; GAMMA TUBULIN; MYOSIN II; SPASTIN; UVOMORULIN;

ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSKELETON; DIPTERA; EMBRYO; MEMBRANE COMPONENT; MICROTUBULE; MORPHOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; SALIVARY GLAND; WILD TYPE; APICAL MEMBRANE; CELL DIVISION; CELL FATE; CELL JUNCTION; CELL SHAPE; CENTROSOME; DROSOPHILA; FLUORESCENCE; INVAGINATION; PHENOTYPE;

ACTOMYOSIN; ANIMALS; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL POLARITY; CELL SHAPE; CYTOSKELETON; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; MICROFILAMENT PROTEINS; MICROTUBULES; MORPHOGENESIS;

EID: 84902000435     PISSN: 15345807     EISSN: 18781551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.03.023     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Akhmanova A., Stehbens S.J., Yap A.S. Touch, grasp, deliver and control: functional cross-talk between microtubules and cell adhesions. Traffic 2009, 10:268-274.
2. Andrew D.J., Ewald A.J. Morphogenesis of epithelial tubes: Insights into tube formation, elongation, and elaboration. Dev. Biol. 2010, 341:34-55.
3. Bartolini F., Gundersen G.G. Generation of noncentrosomal microtubule arrays. J.Cell Sci. 2006, 119:4155-4163.
4. Basu R., Chang F. Shaping the actin cytoskeleton using microtubule tips. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2007, 19:88-94.
5. Bertet C., Sulak L., Lecuit T. Myosin-dependent junction remodelling controls planar cell intercalation and axis elongation. Nature 2004, 429:667-671.
6. Blake K.J., Myette G., Jack J. The products of ribbon and raw are necessary for proper cell shape and cellular localization of nonmuscle myosin in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 1998, 203:177-188.
7. Blanchard G.B., Kabla A.J., Schultz N.L., Butler L.C., Sanson B., Gorfinkiel N., Mahadevan L., Adams R.J. Tissue tectonics: morphogenetic strain rates, cell shape change and intercalation. Nat. Methods 2009, 6:458-464.
8. Blanchard G.B., Murugesu S., Adams R.J., Martinez-Arias A., Gorfinkiel N. Cytoskeletal dynamics and supracellular organisation of cell shape fluctuations during dorsal closure. Development 2010, 137:2743-2752.
9. Bolinger C., Zasadil L., Rizaldy R., Hildebrand J.D. Specific isoforms of Drosophila shroom define spatial requirements for the induction of apical constriction. Dev. Dyn. 2010, 239:2078-2093.
10. Bosher J.M., Hahn B.S., Legouis R., Sookhareea S., Weimer R.M., Gansmuller A., Chisholm A.D., Rose A.M., Bessereau J.L., Labouesse M. The Caenorhabditis elegans vab-10 spectraplakin isoforms protect the epidermis against internal and external forces. J.Cell Biol. 2003, 161:757-768.
11. Brodu V., Baffet A.D., Le Droguen P.M., Casanova J., Guichet A. A developmentally regulated two-step process generates a noncentrosomal microtubule network in Drosophila tracheal cells. Dev. Cell 2010, 18:790-801.
12. Broussard J.A., Webb D.J., Kaverina I. Asymmetric focal adhesion disassembly in motile cells. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2008, 20:85-90.
13. Bush K.T., Lynch F.J., DeNittis A.S., Steinberg A.B., Lee H.Y., Nagele R.G. Neural tube formation in the mouse: a morphometric and computerized three-dimensional reconstruction study of the relationship between apical constriction of neuroepithelial cells and the shape of the neuroepithelium. Anat. Embryol. (Berl.) 1990, 181:49-58.
14. Butler L.C., Blanchard G.B., Kabla A.J., Lawrence N.J., Welchman D.P., Mahadevan L., Adams R.J., Sanson B. Cell shape changes indicate a role for extrinsic tensile forces in Drosophila germ-band extension. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:859-864.
15. Clark I.E., Jan L.Y., Jan Y.N. Reciprocal localization of Nod and kinesin fusion proteins indicates microtubule polarity in the Drosophila oocyte, epithelium, neuron and muscle. Development 1997, 124:461-470.
16. Corrigall D., Walther R.F., Rodriguez L., Fichelson P., Pichaud F. Hedgehog signaling is a principal inducer of Myosin-II-driven cell ingression in Drosophila epithelia. Dev. Cell 2007, 13:730-742.
17. Costantini F., Kopan R. Patterning a complex organ: branching morphogenesis and nephron segmentation in kidney development. Dev. Cell 2010, 18:698-712.
18. David D.J., Tishkina A., Harris T.J. The PAR complex regulates pulsed actomyosin contractions during amnioserosa apical constriction in Drosophila. Development 2010, 137:1645-1655.
19. D'Avino P.P., Takeda T., Capalbo L., Zhang W., Lilley K.S., Laue E.D., Glover D.M. Interaction between Anillin and RacGAP50C connects the actomyosin contractile ring with spindle microtubules at the cell division site. J.Cell Sci. 2008, 121:1151-1158.
20. Feldman J.L., Priess J.R. A role for the centrosome and PAR-3 in the hand-off of MTOC function during epithelial polarization. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:575-582.
21. Fernandez-Gonzalez R., Zallen J.A. Oscillatory behaviors and hierarchical assembly of contractile structures in intercalating cells. Phys. Biol. 2011, 8:045005.
22. Gorfinkiel N., Blanchard G.B. Dynamics of actomyosin contractile activity during epithelial morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2011, 23:531-539.
23. Gorfinkiel N., Blanchard G.B., Adams R.J., Martinez Arias A. Mechanical control of global cell behaviour during dorsal closure in Drosophila. Development 2009, 136:1889-1898.
24. Hetherington S., Gally C., Fritz J.A., Polanowska J., Reboul J., Schwab Y., Zahreddine H., Behm C., Labouesse M. PAT-12, a potential anti-nematode target, is a new spectraplakin partner essential for Caenorhabditis elegans hemidesmosome integrity and embryonic morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 2011, 350:267-278.
25. Jankovics F., Brunner D. Transiently reorganized microtubules are essential for zippering during dorsal closure in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Cell 2006, 11:375-385.
26. Lee S., Kolodziej P.A. The plakin Short Stop and the RhoA GTPase are required for E-cadherin-dependent apical surface remodeling during tracheal tube fusion. Development 2002, 129:1509-1520.
27. Lee J.Y., Harland R.M. Actomyosin contractility and microtubules drive apical constriction in Xenopus bottle cells. Dev. Biol. 2007, 311:40-52.
28. Lee C., Scherr H.M., Wallingford J.B. Shroom family proteins regulate gamma-tubulin distribution and microtubule architecture during epithelial cell shape change. Development 2007, 134:1431-1441.
29. Martin A.C., Kaschube M., Wieschaus E.F. Pulsed contractions of an actin-myosin network drive apical constriction. Nature 2009, 457:495-499.
30. Martin A.C., Gelbart M., Fernandez-Gonzalez R., Kaschube M., Wieschaus E.F. Integration of contractile forces during tissue invagination. J.Cell Biol. 2010, 188:735-749.
31. Mason F.M., Tworoger M., Martin A.C. Apical domain polarization localizes actin-myosin activity to drive ratchet-like apical constriction. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15:926-936.
32. Maybeck V., Röper K. A targeted gain-of-function screen identifies genes affecting salivary gland morphogenesis/tubulogenesis in Drosophila. Genetics 2009, 181:543-565.
33. Mimori-Kiyosue Y. Shaping microtubules into diverse patterns: molecular connections for setting up both ends. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 2011, 68:603-618.
34. Mogensen M.M. Microtubule release and capture in epithelial cells. Biol. Cell 1999, 91:331-341.
35. Mohan S., Rizaldy R., Das D., Bauer R.J., Heroux A., Trakselis M.A., Hildebrand J.D., VanDemark A.P. Structure of Shroom domain 2 reveals a three-segmented coiled-coil required for dimerization, Rock binding, and apical constriction. Mol. Biol. Cell 2012, 23:2131-2142.
36. Myat M.M., Andrew D.J. Organ shape in the Drosophila salivary gland is controlled by regulated, sequential internalization of the primordia. Development 2000, 127:679-691.
37. Myat M.M., Andrew D.J. Epithelial tube morphology is determined by the polarized growth and delivery of apical membrane. Cell 2002, 111:879-891.
38. Pollard T.D., Cooper J.A. Actin, a central player in cell shape and movement. Science 2009, 326:1208-1212.
39. Pope K.L., Harris T.J. Control of cell flattening and junctional remodeling during squamous epithelial morphogenesis in Drosophila. Development 2008, 135:2227-2238.
40. Rauzi M., Lenne P.F., Lecuit T. Planar polarized actomyosin contractile flows control epithelial junction remodelling. Nature 2010, 468:1110-1114.
41. Roll-Mecak A., Vale R.D. Structural basis of microtubule severing by the hereditary spastic paraplegia protein spastin. Nature 2008, 451:363-367.
42. Röper K. Anisotropy of Crumbs and aPKC drives myosin cable assembly during tube formation. Dev. Cell 2012, 23:939-953.
43. Röper K., Brown N.H. Maintaining epithelial integrity: a function for gigantic spectraplakin isoforms in adherens junctions. J.Cell Biol. 2003, 162:1305-1315.
44. Röper K., Brown N.H. A spectraplakin is enriched on the fusome and organizes microtubules during oocyte specification in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:99-110.
45. Röper K., Gregory S.L., Brown N.H. The 'spectraplakins': cytoskeletal giants with characteristics of both spectrin and plakin families. J.Cell Sci. 2002, 115:4215-4225.
46. Royou A., Field C., Sisson J.C., Sullivan W., Karess R. Reassessing the role and dynamics of nonmuscle myosin II during furrow formation in early Drosophila embryos. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15:838-850.
47. Sawyer J.K., Choi W., Jung K.C., He L., Harris N.J., Peifer M. A contractile actomyosin network linked to adherens junctions by Canoe/afadin helps drive convergent extension. Mol. Biol. Cell 2011, 22:2491-2508.
48. Schaefer A.W., Schoonderwoert V.T., Ji L., Mederios N., Danuser G., Forscher P. Coordination of actin filament and microtubule dynamics during neurite outgrowth. Dev. Cell 2008, 15:146-162.
49. Simões Sde.M., Blankenship J.T., Weitz O., Farrell D.L., Tamada M., Fernandez-Gonzalez R., Zallen J.A. Rho-kinase directs Bazooka/Par-3 planar polarity during Drosophila axis elongation. Dev. Cell 2010, 19:377-388.
50. Simões Sde.M., Mainieri A., Zallen J.A. Rho GTPase and Shroom direct planar polarized actomyosin contractility during convergent extension. J.Cell Biol. 2014, 204:575-589.
51. Solon J., Kaya-Copur A., Colombelli J., Brunner D. Pulsed forces timed by a ratchet-like mechanism drive directed tissue movement during dorsal closure. Cell 2009, 137:1331-1342.
52. Somers W.G., Saint R. A RhoGEF and Rho family GTPase-activating protein complex links the contractile ring to cortical microtubules at the onset of cytokinesis. Dev. Cell 2003, 4:29-39.
53. Stramer B., Moreira S., Millard T., Evans I., Huang C.Y., Sabet O., Milner M., Dunn G., Martin P., Wood W. Clasp-mediated microtubule bundling regulates persistent motility and contact repulsion in Drosophila macrophages invivo. J.Cell Biol. 2010, 189:681-689.
54. Suozzi K.C., Wu X., Fuchs E. Spectraplakins: master orchestrators of cytoskeletal dynamics. J.Cell Biol. 2012, 197:465-475.
55. Vale R.D., Spudich J.A., Griffis E.R. Dynamics of myosin, microtubules, and Kinesin-6 at the cortex during cytokinesis in Drosophila S2 cells. J.Cell Biol. 2009, 186:727-738.
56. Warburton D., El-Hashash A., Carraro G., Tiozzo C., Sala F., Rogers O., De Langhe S., Kemp P.J., Riccardi D., Torday J., et al. Lung organogenesis. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2010, 90:73-158.
57. Westermann S., Weber K. Post-translational modifications regulate microtubule function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4:938-947.
58. Zhang D., Grode K.D., Stewman S.F., Diaz-Valencia J.D., Liebling E., Rath U., Riera T., Currie J.D., Buster D.W., Asenjo A.B., et al. Drosophila katanin is a microtubule depolymerase that regulates cortical-microtubule plus-end interactions and cell migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:361-370.