A new approach to assessing the water footprint of wine: An Italian case study

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 490, Issue , 2014, Pages 748-756

  Lamastra, Lucrezia ^a   Suciu, Nicoleta Alina ^a   Novelli, Elisa ^a   Trevisan, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Environmental indicator; Gray water footprint; Italian wine; Water footprint

Indexed keywords

BREWERIES; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WATER SUPPLY;

ACTIVE INGREDIENTS; CLASSICAL METHODOLOGIES; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS; FERTILIZATION RATES; GRAY WATER; PRODUCTION SYSTEM; WATER FOOTPRINT; WATER WITHDRAWAL;

WINE;

BLUE WATER; FRESH WATER; GRAY WATER; GREEN WATER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; COMMODITY; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR; PRODUCTION SYSTEM; SUSTAINABILITY; WATER FOOTPRINT; WATER USE;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FERTILIZATION; ITALY; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE; VINEYARD; VIVA METHOD; WATER CONTAMINATION; WATER CYCLE; WATER FOOTPRINT; WATER MANAGEMENT; WINE; WINE INDUSTRY; AGRICULTURE; ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; WATER SUPPLY;

ITALY; SICILY;

AGRICULTURE; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ITALY; WATER RESOURCES; WATER SUPPLY; WINE;

EID: 84901999729     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.063     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D., Smith M. Crop evapotranspiration - guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, FAO, Rome, Italy 1998, [http://www.fao.org/docrep/X0490E/x0490e00.htm].
2. BBCH Monograph Growth stages of mono- and dicotyledonous plants 2001, Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry.
3. Berenzen N., Lentzen-Godding A., Probst M., Schulz H., Schulz R., Liess M. A comparison of predicted and measured levels of run-off-related pesticide concentrations in small lowland streams on a landscape level. Chemosphere 2005, 58:683-691.
4. Carlsen S.C.K., Spliid N.H., Svensmark B. Drift of 10 herbicides after tractor spray application. 1. Secondary drift (evaporation). Chemosphere 2006, 64:787-794.
5. Carlsen S.C.K., Spliid N.H., Svensmark B. Drift of 10 herbicides after tractor spray application. 2. Primary drift (droplet drift). Chemosphere 2006, 64:778-786.
6. Cicchelli A., Raggi A., Pattara C. Life cycle assessment and carbon footprint in the wine supply chain. 7th International Conference on LCA in the Agri Food Sector, Bari, Italy 2010.
7. Ene S.A., Teodosiu C., Robu B., Volf I. Water footprint assessment in the winemaking industry: a case study for a Romanian medium size production plant. J Clean Prod 2013, 43:122-135.
8. European Water Partnership European water stewardship [accessed on 17.03.2014.]. http://www.ewp.eu/activities/water-stewardship/.
9. Falkenmark M., Lannerstad M. Consumptive water use to feed humanity - curing a blind spot. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2007, 9:15-28.
10. Falkenmark M., Rockström J. The new blue and green water paradigm: breaking new ground for water resources planning and management. J Water Resour Plan Manage 2006, 132:129-132.
11. Fank J. Die Bewirtschaftung des Versuchsfeldes Wagna - Auswirkung auf die Grundwassersituation. Seminar Umweltprogramme für die Landwirtschaft und deren Auswirkung auf die Grundwasserqualität, HBLFA Raumberg-Gumpenstein, Research report European lysimeter platform 2006.
12. FAO Aquastat Country fact sheet Italy 2012, [Generated: 10.01.2014].
13. FOCUS FOCUS surface water scenarios in the EU evaluation process under 91/414/EEC. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios, EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001 - rev.2. FOCUS 2001, [245 pp.].
14. FOCUS Landscape and mitigation factors in aquatic risk assessment. Detailed technical reviews report of the FOCUS working group on landscape and mitigation factors in ecological risk assessment, EC document reference SANCO/10422/2005v2.0. 2007, vol. 2. [436 pp.].
15. FOOTPRINT The FOOTPRINT Pesticide Properties DataBase. Database collated by the University of Hertfordshire as part of the EU-funded FOOTPRINT project (FP6-SSP-022704). FOOTPRINT 2006, [http://www.eu-footprint.org/ppdb.html].
16. Francke I.C.M., Castro J.F.W. Carbon and water footprint analysis of a soap bar produced in Brazil by Natura Cosmetics. Water Resour Ind 2013, 1-2:37-48.
17. Ganzelmeier H., Rautmann D., Spangenberg R., Streloke M., Hermann M., Wenzelburger H.J., et al. Studies on the spray drift of plant protection products. Results of a test program carried out throughout the Federal Republic of Germany. Herausgegeben von der Biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft Berlin-Dahlem; H305 1995, [ISBN: 3-8263-3039-2].
18. Herath I., Green S., Singh R., Horne D., van der Zijpp S., Clothier B. Water footprinting of agricultural products: a hydrological assessment for the water footprint of New Zealand's wines. J Clean Prod 2013, 41:232-243.
19. Hoekstra A.Y., Chapagain A.K., Aldaya M.M., Mekonnen M.M. The water footprint assessment manual: setting the global standard 2011, Water Footprint Network. Earthscan Publishing, London.
20. Hoff H., Falkenmark M., Gerten D., Gordon L., Karlberg L., Rockström J. Greening the global water system. J Hydrol 2010, 384:177-186.
21. Hutson J.L., Wagenet R.J. Leaching estimation and chemistry model: a process-based model of water and solute movement, transformations, plant uptake, and chemical reactions in the unsaturated zone. Version 3. Research series 92-3 1992, Department of Soil, Crop and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
22. Jaeken P., Debaer C. Risk of water contamination by plant protection products (PPP) during pre- and post-treatment operations. Ann Rev Agric Eng 2005, 4(1):93-114.
23. Kreuger J., Nilsson E. Catchment scale risk-mitigation experiences - key issues for reducing pesticide transport to surface waters. BCPC conference pesticide behavior in soil and water 2001, 78:319-324.
24. Lazzaro L., Otto S., Zanin G. Role of hedgerows in intercepting spray drift: evaluation and modelling of the effects. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2008, 123:317-327.
25. Mekonnen M.M., Hoekstra A.Y. The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2011, 15:1577-1600.
26. Padovani L., Trevisan M., Capri E. A calculation procedure to assess potential environmental risk of pesticides at the farm level. Ecol Indic 2004, 4:111-123.
27. Reichenberger S., Bach M., Skitschak A., Frede H.G. Mitigation strategies to reduce pesticide inputs into ground- and surface water and their effectiveness; a review. Sci Total Environ 2007, 384:1-35.
28. Reus J., Leendertse P., Bockstaller C., Fomsgaard I., Gutsche V., Lewis K., et al. Comparing environmental risk indicators for pesticides. Results of the European CAPER project 1999, CLM, Center for Agriculture & Environment, Utrecht, [184 pp.].
29. Ruini L., Marino M., Pignatelli S., Laio F., Rido L. Water footprint of a large-sized food company: the case of Barilla pasta production. Water Resour Ind 2013, 1-2:7-24.
30. Trevisan M., Di Guardo A., Balderacchi M. An environmental indicator to drive sustainable pest management practices. Environ Model Softw 2009, 24:994-1002.
31. UN water Water use statistics [accessed on 17.03.2014]. http://www.unwater.org/statisticsuse.html.
32. Vanham D. A holistic water balance of Austria - how does the quantitative proportion of urban water requirements relate to other users?. Water Sci Technol 2012, 66:549-555.