Retention and curve number variability in a small agricultural catchment: The probabilistic approach

Water (Switzerland)

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1118-1133

  Banasik, Kazimierz ^a   Rutkowska, Agnieszka ^b   Kohnová, Silvia ^c  

^a WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE IN KRAKOW   (Poland)

^c SLOVAK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Antecedent runoff conditions; Curve number; Retention parameter; Theoretical distribution

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; CATCHMENTS; CURVE FITTING; DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS; FLOODS; RAIN; RUNOFF; SOIL CONSERVATION;

ANTECEDENT RUNOFF CONDITIONS; CURVE NUMBERS; GENERALIZED EXTREME VALUE; PROBABILISTIC APPROACHES; PROBABILISTIC PROPERTIES; RETENTION PARAMETER; SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICES; THEORETICAL DISTRIBUTION;

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

AGRICULTURAL CATCHMENT; ESTIMATION METHOD; INFILTRATION; PROBABILITY; RAINFALL; RUNOFF; SOIL CONSERVATION;

POLAND;

EID: 84901992222     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20734441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/w6051118     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Banasik, K. Catchment responses to heavy rainfall events in a changing environment. In Prediction and Reduction of Diffuse Pollution, Solid Emission and Extreme Flows from Rural Areas-Case Study of Small Agricultural Catchments; Banasik, K., Øygarden, L., Hejduk, L., Eds.; SGGW Press: Warsaw, Poland, 2011; pp. 7-25.
2. Arnell, N. Hydrology and Global Environmental Change Prentice Hall: Essex, UK, 2002.
3. Gaál, L.; Szolgay, J.; Lapin, M.; Faŝko, P. Hybrid approach to delineation of homogeneous regions for regional precipitation frequency analysis. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 2009, 57, 226-249.
4. Mishra, S.K.; Tyagi, J.V.; Singh, V.P.; Singh, R. SCS-CN-based modeling of sediment yield. J. Hydrol. 2006, 324, 301-322.
5. Arnold, J.G.; Williams, J.R.; Srinivasan, R.; King, K.W. SWAT: Soil Water Assessment Tool; Texas Agricultural Experiment Station: Blackland Research Center, Texas A& M University, Temple, TX, USA, 1995.
6. ASCE. Curve Number Hydrology: State of the Practice; Hawkins, R.H., Ward, T.J., Woodward, D.E., van Mullem, J.A., Eds.; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2009.
7. USDA NRCS. National Engineering Handbook: Part 630-Hydrology; USDA Soil Conservation Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
8. Hawkins, R. Improved prediction of storm runoff in mountain watersheds. J. Irrig. Drain. Div. 1973, 99, 519-523.
9. Hawkins, R. Runoff curve numbers from partial area watersheds. J. Irrig. Drain. Div. 1979, 105, 375-389.
10. Hawkins, R.; Hjelmfelt, J.A.; Zevenbergen, A. Runoff probability, storm depth and curve numbers. J. Irrig. Drain. Div. 1985, 111, 330-340.
11. Mishra, S.K.; Singh, V.P.; Sansalone, J.J.; Aravamuthan, V. A modified SCS-CN method: Characterization and Testing. Water Resour. Manag. 2003, 17, 37-68.
12. Babu, P.S.; Mishra, S.K. Improved SCS-CN-Inspired Model. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2012, 17, 1164-1172.
13. Hjelmfelt, A. Investigation of curve number procedure. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1991, 117, 725-737.
14. McCuen, R. Approach to confidence interval estimation for curve numbers. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2002, 7, 43-48.
15. Schneider, L.E.; McCuen, R. Statistical Guidelines for Curve Number Generation. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2005, 131, 282-290.
16. Tedela, N.M.; McCutcheon, S.C.; Rasmussen, T.C.; Tollner, E.W. Evaluation and Improvements of the Curve Number Method of Hydrological Analysis on Selected Forested Watersheds of Georgia. The University of Georgia, report submitted to GeorgiaWater Resources Institute. Available online: http://water.usgs.gov/wrri/07grants/progress/2007GA143B.pdf (accessed on 25 October 2013).
17. Bondelid, T.; McCuen, R.; Jackson, T. Sensitivity of SCS Models to Curve Number Variation. JAWRA 1982, 18, 111-116.
18. Epps, T.H.; Hitchcock, D.R.; Jayakaran, A.D.; Loflin, D.R.; Williams, T.M.; Amatya, D.M. Curve Number derivation for watersheds draining two headwater streams in lower coastal plain South Carolina, USA. JAWRA 2013, 49, 1284-1295.
19. Hawkins, R. Asymptotic determination of curve numbers from data. J. Irrig. Drain. Div. 1993, 119, 334-345.
20. Banasik, K.; Ignar S. Estimation of effective rainfall using the SCS method on the base of measured rainfall and runoff. Rev. Geophys. 1983, XXVII, 401-408. (In Polish)
21. Banasik, K.; Woodward, D. Empirical determination of runoff curve number for a small agricultural watershed in Poland. In Proceedings of the 2 Joint Federal Interagency Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 27 June-1 July 2010; pp. 1-11. Available online: http://acwi.gov/sos/pubs/2ndJFIC/Contents/10E_Banasik_28_02_10.pdf (accessed on 25 October 2013).
22. Tedela, N.H.; McCutcheon, S.C.; Rasmussen, T.C.; Hawkins, R.H.; Swank, W.T.; Campbell, J.L.; Adams, M.B.; Jackson, R.C.; Tollner, E.W. Runoff Curve Numbers for 10 Small Forested Watersheds in the Mountains of the Eastern United States. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2012, 17, 1188-1198.
23. Banasik, K. Sedimentgraph model of rainfall event in a small agricultural watershed. In Treaties and Monographs; SGGW Press: Warsaw, Poland, 1994. (In Polish)
24. Banasik, K; Hejduk, L. Long-term Changes in Runoff from a Small Agricultural Catchment. Soil Water Res. 2012, 2, 64-72. Available online: http://www.agriculturejournals.cz/publicFiles/64803.pdf (accessed on 25 October 2013).
25. Banasik, K; Hejduk, L. Flow Duration Curves for Two Small Catchments with Various Records in Lowland Part of Poland. Annu. Set Environ. Prot. 2013, 15, 287-300.
26. Chow, V.T. Handbook of Applied Hydrology: A Compendium of Water-Resources Technology (Section 14 Runoff); McGraw-Hill Book Company: New York, NY, USA, 1964.
27. Mitchell, J.K.; Banasik, K.; Hirschi, M.C.; Cooke, R.A.C.; Kalita, P. There is not always surface runoff and sediment transport. In Soil Erosion Research for the 21st Century; Ascough J.C., Flanagan, D.C., Eds.; ASAE: St. Joseph, MI, USA, 2001; pp. 676-678. doi: 10.13031/2013.4842.
28. USDA Soil Conservation Service (SCS). National Engineering Handbook (Section 4 Hydrology); USDA SCS: Washington, DC, USA, 1954.
29. Billingsley, P. Probability and Measure; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA; Chichester, UK; Brisbane, Australia; Toronto, ON, Canada, 1979.
30. Barra, J.R. Notions fondamentales de statistique mathè matique; Dunod: Paris, France, 1971.
31. Lehmann, E.L.; Casella, G. Theory of Point Estimation, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1998; Toronto, ON, Canada, 1979.
32. Lehmann, E.L.; Romano, J.P. Testing Statistical Hypotheses, 3rd ed.; Springer Texts in Statistics; Springer: New York, USA, 2005.
33. Stephens, M.A. Tests Based on EDF Statistics, in Goodness-of-Fit Techniques; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 1986.
34. Anderson, T.W.; Darling, D.A. A Test of Goodness of Fit. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1954, 49, 765-769.
35. Laio, F. Cramer-von Mises and Anderson Darling goodness of fit tests for extreme value distributions with unknown parameters. Water Resour. Res. 2004, 40, doi: 10.1029/2004WR003204.
36. Shapiro, S.S.; Wilk, M.B. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 1965, 52, 591-611.
37. DVWK. Regeln 101/1999 Estimation of Design Discharges. Guidelines; Paul Parey: Hamburg, Germany, 1999. (In German)
38. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1974, 19, 716-723.
39. Banasik, K.; Byczkowski, A. Probable annual floods in a small lowland river estimated with the use of various sets of data. Ann. Wars. Univ. Life Sci.-SGGW Land Reclam. 2007, 38, 3-10.
40. Laio, F.; Baldassare, G.; Montanari, A. Model selection techniques for the frequency analysis of hydrological extremes. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45, doi: 10.1029/2007WR006666.
41. Bonta, J.V. Determination of watershed curve number using derived distributions. J. Irrig. Drain. Div. 1997, 123, 28-36.