Meeting the micro-level challenges: Bibliometrics at the individual level

12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 846-856

  Sandström, Ulf ^a   Sandström, Erik ^b  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Erik Sandström ^*  (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

BIBLIOGRAPHIC COUPLINGS; CITATION ANALYSIS; INDIVIDUAL LEVELS; RESEARCH ASSESSMENT EXERCISE; RESEARCH PURPOSE; ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONS; WEB OF SCIENCE;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84901989698     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Aksnes DW (2003a). A macro study of self-citations. Scientometrics 56(2):235-246.
2. Aksnes DW (2003b). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation 12 (3): 159-170.
3. Amsterdamska, O & Leydesdorff, L (1989). Citations: indicators of significance? Scientometrics 15 (5-6):449-471.
4. Bornmann, L, Mutz, R, Neuhaus, C, Daniel, H-D (2008). Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results. Ethics Sci Environ Polit, 8: 93-102.
5. Boyack KW (2007). Using detailed maps of science to identify potential collaborations. Proceedings of ISSI 2007, edited by Torres-Salinas & Moed. Madrid, Spain June 25-27, 2007. Vol 1, 124- 135.
6. Boyack KW, Börner K (2003) Indicator-assisted evaluation and funding of research: Visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papers. JASIST, 54 (5): 447-461.
7. Boyack KW & Klavans R (2006). Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (2): 251-263.
8. Boyack KW, Klavans R, Börner K (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64: 351-374.
9. Chen, CM (2006). Information Visualization: beyond the horizon. 2nd Edition. London: Springer Verlag.
10. Cole S (1992). Making science: between nature and society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
11. CWTS (2007). Scoping study on the use of bibliometric analysis to measure the quality of research in UK higher education institutions. Report to HEFCE by the Leiden group. November 2007. [http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rdreports/2007/ rd18-07/rd18-07.pdf].
12. Garfield, E (1979). Citation indexing - its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: Wiley.
13. Glänzel W, Schubert A, Schoepflin U, et al. (1999). An item-by-item subject classification of papers published in journals covered by the SSCI database using reference analysis. Scientometrics, 46 (3): 431-441.
14. Jarneving B (2005). A comparison of two bibliometric methods for mapping of the research front. Scientometrics 65 (2): 245-263.
15. Jarneving B (2007). Bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents. Journal of Informetrics, 1 (4): 287-307.
16. Kamada, T & Kawai, S (1989). An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31(1):7-15.
17. Kessler, MM (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14, 10- 25.
18. Klavans, R & Boyack, KW (2005). Mapping world-wide science at the paper level. Proceedings of ISSI 2005, pp. 426-436.
19. Klavans, R & Boyack, KW (2008) Thought leadership: A new indicator for national and institutional comparison. Scientometrics, 75 (2): 239-252.
20. Lewison, G. (2005). Commentary on "Measurement of Central Aspects of scientific Research". Measurement, 3 (1): 29-32.
21. Leydesdorff, L. (2008) Caveats for the Use of Citation Indicators in Research and Journal Evaluations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2): 278-287.
22. Leydesdorff, L & Amsterdamska, O (1990). Dimensions of citation analysis. Science, Technology & Human Values 15 (3): 305-315.
23. Martin B.R. & Irvine J. (1983). Assessing basic research: some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy. Research Policy, 12: 61-90.
24. Martin, SB, Brown, WM, Klavans, R & Boyack, KW (2008 submitted). DrL: distributed recursive (graph) layout. Journal of Graph Algorithm and Applications.
25. Morris, S. A., Yen, G., Wu, Z., & Asnake, B. (2003). Time line visualization of research fronts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 413-422.
26. Seglen, PO (1998) Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research. Acta Orthop Scand 69 (3): 224-229.
27. Small, H. (1993). Macro-level changes on the structure of co-citations clusters: 1983-1989. Scientometrics 26 (1): 5-20.
28. Visser, M.S., Nederhof, A.J. (2007) Bibliometric study of the Uppsala University, Sweden, 2002- 2006. In: Quality and renewal 2007: An overall evaluation of research at Uppsala University 2006/2007. Uppsala: Uppsala University.