Knowledge creation in improving a software organisation

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Volumn 59, Issue , 2001, Pages 205-223

  Pourkomeylian, Pouya ^a,b  

^a ASTRAZENECA R AND D   (Sweden)

^b VIKTORIA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Organisational Knowledge Creation (OKC); Software Process Improvement (SPI)

Indexed keywords

PROCESS ENGINEERING;

COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH; KNOWLEDGE CREATIONS; ORGANISATIONAL KNOWLEDGE; ORGANISATIONAL LEVEL; PROJECT-BASED; SOFTWARE ORGANISATIONS; SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS; TACIT AND EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 84901931445     PISSN: 18684238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35404-0_13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Aaen I., Arent J., Mathiassen L., Ngwenyama O.: A Conceptual MAP of Software Process Improvement. Artikelsamling, Center for Softwareprocesforbedring. Dansk Elektronik, Lys & Akustik. 2000.
2. Ami: Ami, application of metrics in industry. A Qualitative Approach to Software Management, CSSE South Bank University, London. 1992
3. Aren J. and Norbjerg J: SPI as Organizational Knowledge Creation: A Multiple Case Analysis. Proceedings Conference Proceedings at Maui Hawaii, January 2000.
4. Arent J., Iversen J., Development of a Method for Maturity Assessments in Software Organizations based on the Capability Maturity Model, in Department of Computer Science. Aalborg: Aalborg University, 1996
5. Bach James: The Immaturity of the CMM. American Programmer. 1994
6. Baskerville, R. & A. T. Wood-Harper, A Critical Perspective on Action Research as a Method for Information Systems Research Journal of information technology, Volll, 1996. Checkland Peter, Scholes Jim: Soft System Methodology in Action, John Wiley & Sons LTD. England.
7. Cook S.D.N. and Brown J.S., Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing, Organization Science l 0, No 4, 381-400, 1999.
8. Curtis, B.: Improving software organizations with the CMM. Seminar. 1996.
9. Debou, C.: SPI Success Factors: Toward More Business Orientation. Software Process Newsletter, 10, 15-18. 1997.
10. Firebaugh, M. W.: Artificial Intelligence-A Knowledge-Based Approach. Boston: PWSKENT Publishing Company. 1989.
11. Goldenson, D. R., and J. D. Herbsleb.: After the Appraisal: A Systematic Survay of Process Improvement, its benefits, and Factors that Influence Success. CMU/SEI-95-TR-009, SEI, Pittsburgh. 1995.
12. Gremba Jennifer and Myres Chuck: The IDEAL Model: A Practical Guide for Improvement, Software Engineering Institue, Cornegie Mellon University. 1997.
13. Halloran, P.: Organizational Learning from the Perspective of a Software Process Assessment &Improvement Program. A paper delivered at the HICS 1999, Hawaii, 1999.
14. Hayes Will, Zubrow Dave: Moving On Up: Data and Experience Doing CMM-Based Process Improvement, Technical Report CMU/SEI-95-TR-008, August 1995.
15. Herbsleb, J., et al.: Software Quality and the Capability Maturity Model. Communications of the ACM, 40(6), 30-40. 1997.
16. Humphrey, Watts S.: Managing the Software Processes, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, USA. 1989
17. Johansen, J., and L.: Mathiassen. Lessons learned in a National SPI Effort. EuroSPI 98 Goteborg. 1998.
18. Kuvaja Pasi, Bicego: BOOTSTRAP-a European assessment methodology, Software Quality Journal 3, 117-127. 1994.
19. Larsen E., Kautz K: Quality Assurance and Software Process Improvement in Norway, Software process improvement pract., 3, 71-86 1997
20. Mathiassen, L: Reflective systems Development. Dr. Thechn. Thesis, Aalborg University, Danmark, www.cs.auc.dk/~larsm. 1998.
21. McFeeley Bob: IDEAL: A User's Guide for Software Process Improvement, Software Engineering Institue, Cornegie Mellon University. 1996.
22. Mashiko, Y., and V.R. Basiili: Using the GQM Paradigm to Investigate Influential Factors for Software Process Improvement. Journal of Systems and Software, 36. 17-32. 1997.
23. Nonaka I. And Konno N.: The Concept of "Ba": Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation, California Management Review Vol 40, No.3, Spring 1998
24. Nonak, I., and Takeuchi H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company, Oxford University Press, Inc. 1995.
25. Paulk C. Mark: Foreword (Software Process Improvement, Sami Zahran 1998 Practical Guidelines for Business Success, Addison Wesley Longman), Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA Software Process Improvement.1997.
26. Paulk Mark C., et at.: The Capability Maturity Model for software Version 1.1, Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute. 1993.
27. Polanyi, M.,: The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 1966.
28. Pressman Roger S.: Software Engineering, a practitioner's approach, fourth edition, International editions. 1997.
29. Stelzer, D., Mellis, W., and Herzwurm, G.: "Technology Diffusion in Software Development Processes: The contribution of Organizational Learning to Software Process Improvement. " In Information Systems Innovation and Diffusion: Issues and Directions, ed. T. Larsen and E. McGuire, 297-344. Hershey, Usa: idea Group Publisher, 1998.
30. Ticki T, Ticki T: Guide to Software Quality Management System Construction and Certification using ISO 9001:1994. Issue l. O, DISC TickiT Office, November. 1995.
31. Thomson Helen E., Mayhew Pam: Approaches to Software Process Improvement, Software Process-Improvement and Practice, Vol. 3, 3-17. 1997.
32. Wohlwend H. and Rosenbaum S: Schlumberger's Software Improvement Program, IEEE Transactions on software engineering, Vol 20. No. 11. November 1994
33. Zubrow David et. al.: Maturity Questionnaire, Special Report CMU/SEI-94-SR-7, Software Engineering Institute. 1994.