Using perceptive computing in multiple sclerosis - The Short Maximum Speed Walk test

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Behrens, Janina ^a   Pfüller, Caspar ^a   Mansow Model, Sebastian ^b   Otte, Karen ^b   Paul, Friedemann ^a   Brandt, Alexander U ^a,b  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b Motognosis UG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computerized gait assessment; Gait impairment; Multiple sclerosis; T25FW; Walking speed

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EVALUATION STUDY; EXPANDED DISABILITY STATUS SCALE; EXPERIMENTAL LOCOMOTOR ACTIVITY TEST; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT MAXIMUM SPEED WALK; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; TIMED 25 FOOT WALK; WALKING SPEED; COMPUTER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DISABILITY; EQUIPMENT; FEASIBILITY STUDY; METHODOLOGY; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NEUROLOGIC GAIT DISORDER; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; COMPUTERS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GAIT; GAIT DISORDERS, NEUROLOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84901922257     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-89     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Multiple sclerosis. Noseworthy JH, Lucchinetti C, Rodriguez M, Weinshenker BG, N Engl J Med 2000 343 13 938 952 10.1056/NEJM200009283431307 11006371
2. Cost of multiple sclerosis by level of disability: a review of literature. Patwardhan MB, Matchar DB, Samsa GP, McCrory DC, Williams RG, Li TT, Mult Scler 2005 11 2 232 239 10.1191/1352458505ms1137oa 15794399 (Pubitemid 40403265)
3. Employment status in multiple sclerosis: impact of disease-specific and non-disease-specific factors. Krause I, Kern S, Horntrich A, Ziemssen T, Mult Scler 2013 19 13 1792 1799 10.1177/1352458513485655 23635910
4. Expert recommendations to personalization of medical approaches in treatment of multiple sclerosis: an overview of family planning and pregnancy. Borisow N, Döring A, Pfueller CF, Paul F, Dörr J, Hellwig K, EPMA J 2012 3 1 9 10.1186/1878-5085-3-9 22738272
5. Trunk sway in mildly disabled multiple sclerosis patients with and without balance impairment. Findling O, Sellner J, Meier N, Allum JHJ, Vibert D, Lienert C, Mattle HP, Exp Brain Res 2011 213 4 363 370 10.1007/s00221-011-2795- 8 21773798
6. Motor impairments at presentation of clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis: Characterization of different disease subtypes. Kalron A, Achiron A, Dvir Z, NeuroRehabilitation 2012 31 2 147 155 22951709
7. Muscular and gait abnormalities in persons with early onset multiple sclerosis. Kalron A, Achiron A, Dvir Z, J Neurol Phys Ther 2011 35 4 164 169 10.1097/NPT.0b013e31823801f4 22052130
8. Gait and balance impairment in early multiple sclerosis in the absence of clinical disability. Martin CL, Phillips BA, Kilpatrick TJ, Butzkueven H, Tubridy N, McDonald E, Galea MP, Mult Scler 2006 12 5 620 628 10.1177/1352458506070658 17086909 (Pubitemid 46947926)
9. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Kurtzke JF, Neurology 1983 33 11 1444 1452 10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444 6685237 (Pubitemid 14237132)
10. Interrater variability with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and Functional Systems (FS) in a multiple sclerosis clinical trial. The Canadian Cooperation MS Study Group. Noseworthy JH, Vandervoort MK, Wong CJ, Ebers GC, Neurology 1990 40 6 971 975 10.1212/WNL.40.6.971 2189084 (Pubitemid 20201827)
11. EDSS reliability. Goodkin DE, Neurology 1991 41 2 Part 1 332 332 1992392
12. The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Measure (MSFC): an integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment. National MS Society Clinical Outcomes Assessment Task Force. Fischer JS, Rudick RA, Cutter GR, Reingold SC, Mult Scler 1999 5 4 244 250 10.1177/135245859900500409 10467383 (Pubitemid 29405620)
13. The reliability of the MSFC and its components. Rosti-Otajärvi E, Hämäläinen P, Koivisto K, Hokkanen L, Acta Neurol Scand 2008 117 6 421 427 18081910 (Pubitemid 351643674)
14. Timed 25-foot walk: direct evidence that improving 20% or greater is clinically meaningful in MS. Hobart J, Blight AR, Goodman A, Lynn F, Putzki N, Neurology 2013 80 16 1509 1517 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828cf7f3 23535489
15. Which walking capacity tests to use in multiple sclerosis? A multicentre study providing the basis for a core set. Gijbels D, Dalgas U, Romberg A, de Groot V, Bethoux F, Vaney C, Gebara B, Medina CS, Maamâgi H, Rasova K, de Noordhout BM, Knuts K, Feys P, Mult Scler 2012 18 3 364 371 10.1177/ 1352458511420598 21952098
16. Quantification of walking mobility in neurological disorders. Pearson OR, Busse ME, van Deursen RWM, Wiles CM, QJM 2004 97 8 463 475 15256604 (Pubitemid 39144594)
17. Quantifying gait impairment in multiple sclerosis using GAITRite technology. Sosnoff JJ, Weikert M, Dlugonski D, Smith DC, Motl RW, Gait Posture 2011 34 1 145 147 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.03.020 21531562
18. Quantifying gait abnormalities in persons with multiple sclerosis with minimal disability. Sosnoff JJ, Sandroff BM, Motl RW, Gait Posture 2012 36 1 154 156 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.11.027 22424761
19. Decision Forests for Classification, Regression, Density Estimation, Manifold Learning and Semi-Supervised Learning [Internet]. Criminisi A, Shotton J, Konukoglu E, Microsoft Research 2011 Available from: http://research. microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?id=155552
20. Mendel J, Wu D, Perceptual Computing: Aiding People in Making Subjective Judgments Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010 339
21. Kinect for Windows SDK from Microsoft Research. [Internet]. [cited 2011 Oct 28]. Available from: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/kinectforwindowsdev/ Downloads.aspx
22. Model-based reinforcement of kinect depth data for human motion capture applications. Calderita LV, Bandera JP, Bustos P, Skiadopoulos A, Sensors (Basel) 2013 13 7 8835 8855 10.3390/s130708835 23845933
23. Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control. Clark RA, Pua Y-H, Fortin K, Ritchie C, Webster KE, Denehy L, Bryant AL, Gait Posture 2012 36 3 372 377 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.033 22633015
24. Balance recovery through virtual stepping exercises using Kinect skeleton tracking: a follow-up study with chronic stroke patients. Lloréns R, Alcañiz M, Colomer C, Navarro MD, Stud Health Technol Inform 2012 181 108 112 22954838
25. Accuracy of Kinect's skeleton tracking for upper body rehabilitation applications. Mobini A, Behzadipour S, Saadat Foumani M, Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2013 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2013.805825 ]
26. Accuracy and resolution of kinect depth data for indoor mapping applications. Khoshelham K, Elberink SO, Sensors (Basel) 2012 12 2 1437 1454 22438718
27. Full body gait analysis with Kinect. Gabel M, Gilad-Bachrach R, Renshaw E, Schuster A, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012 2012 1964 1967 23366301
28. Capturing habitual, in-home gait parameter trends using an inexpensive depth camera. Stone EE, Skubic M, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012 2012 5106 5109 23367077
29. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, Fujihara K, Havrdova E, Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Montalban X, O'Connor P, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Thompson AJ, Waubant E, Weinshenker B, Wolinsky JS, Ann Neurol 2011 69 2 292 302 10.1002/ana.22366 21387374
30. Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure. Cutter GR, Baier ML, Rudick RA, Cookfair DL, Fischer JS, Petkau J, Syndulko V, Weinshenker BG, Antel JP, Confavreux C, Ellison GW, Lublin F, Miller AE, Rao SM, Reingold SM, Thompson A, Willoughby E, Brain 1999 122 Pt 5 871 882 10355672 (Pubitemid 29219261)
31. Gait variability and multiple sclerosis. Socie MJ, Sosnoff JJ, Mult Scler Int. 2013 2013 645197 23533759
32. Passive in-home measurement of stride-to-stride gait variability comparing vision and Kinect sensing. Stone EE, Skubic M, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011 2011 6491 6494 22255825
33. Gait variability in people with multiple sclerosis. Crenshaw SJ, Royer TD, Richards JG, Hudson DJ, Mult Scler 2006 12 5 613 619 10.1177/ 1352458505070609 17086908 (Pubitemid 46940636)
34. Multiple sclerosis spasticity: "state-of-the-art" questionnaire survey of specialized healthcare professionals. Collongues N, Vermersch P, Expert Rev Neurother 2013 13 3 Suppl 1 21 25
35. Spasticity and everyday life in multiple sclerosis. Donzé C, De Sèze J, Rev Neurol (Paris) 2012 168 3 51 S56 22721365
36. Motor Fatigue Measurement by Distance-Induced Slow Down of Walking Speed in Multiple Sclerosis. Phan-Ba R, Calay P, Grodent P, Delrue G, Lommers E, Delvaux V, PLoS One [Internet]. 2012 Apr 13 [cited 2013 Aug 22];7(4). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034744
37. A corrected version of the Timed-25 Foot Walk Test with a dynamic start to capture the maximum ambulation speed in multiple sclerosis patients. Phan-Ba R, Calay P, Grodent P, Delrue G, Lommers E, Delvaux V, Moonen G, Nagels G, Belachew S, NeuroRehabilitation 2012 30 4 261 266 22672939
38. Perception of lower limb spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury. Fleuren JF, Voerman GE, Snoek GJ, Nene AV, Rietman JS, Hermens HJ, Spinal Cord 2009 47 5 396 400 10.1038/sc.2008.153 19065149