Writing administration as scholarship and teaching

Academic Advancement in Composition Studies: Scholarship, Publication, Promotion, Tenure

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 43-55

  Roen, Duane H ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901866766     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203811146-10     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Aphthonius. Progymnasmata. Trans. Ray Nadeau. Speech Monographs 19 (1952): 264-85. Rpt. in Readings from Classical Rhetoric. Ed. Patricia P. Matsen, Philip Rollinson, and Marion Sousa. Carbondale: Southern Illinois U P, 1990. 267-88.
2. Ashton-Jones, Evelyn, and Dene Kay Thomas. “Composition, Collaboration, and Women’s Ways of Knowing: A Conversation with Mary Belenky.” Journal of Advanced Composition 10 (1990): 275-92.
3. Bleich, David. Subjective Criticism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins U P, 1978.
4. Boyer, Ernest L. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1990.
5. Bullock, Richard H. “When Administration Becomes Scholarship: The Future of Writing Program Administration.” Writing Program Administration 11 (1987): 13-18.
6. Fish, Stanley. Is There a Text in This Class? Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1980.
7. Gere, Ann Ruggles, ed. Roots in the Sawdust: Writing to Learn Across the Disciplines. Urbana: NCTE, 1985.
8. Holland, Norman. The Dynamics of Literary Response. New York: Norton, 1975.
9. Hult, Christine A. “The Scholarship of Administration.” Resituating Writing: Constructing and Administering Writing Programs. Eds. Joseph Janangelo and Kristine Hansen. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook-Heinemann, 1995. 119-31.
10. Hult, Christine, David Jolliffe. Kathleen Kelly, Dana Mead, and Charles Schuster. “The Portland Resolution.” Writing Program Administration 16(1992): 88-94.
11. Iser, Wolfgang. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1978.
12. Iser, Wolfgang. The Implied Reader. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins U P, 1974.
13. Kinkead, Joyce A., and Jeanette G. Harris, eds. Writing Centers in Context: Twelve Case Studies.Urbana: NCTE, 1993.
14. Moffett, James. Active Voice: A Writing Program Across the Curriculum. Portsmouth: Boynton-Cook. 1981.
15. Moffett, James. Teaching the Universe of Discourse. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1968.
16. Murphy, James J., ed. A Short History of Writing Instruction fromAncient Greece to Twentieth-Century America. Davis: Hermagoras, 1990.
17. Rosenblatt, Louise. Literature As Exploration. New York: D. Appleton-Century, 1938. Rpt. New York: MLA, 1983.
18. Rosenblatt, Louise. The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois U P, 1978.
19. Russell, David. Writing in the Academic Disciplines, 1870-1990. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1991.
20. Schon, Donald A. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991.
21. Schuster, Charles I. “The Politics of Promotion." The Politics of Writing Instruction: Postsecondary. Ed. Richard Bullock and John Trimbur. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook-Heinemann, 1991. 85-95.
22. Schwalm, David E. Writing Program Administration electronic dialogue contribution. 6 July 1994.
23. Slevin, James F. “The Politics of the Profession.” An Introduction to Composition Studies. Ed. Erika Lindemann and Gary Tate. New York: Oxford UP, 1991. 135-59.
24. White, Edward. Writing Program Administration electronic dialogue contribution. 6 July 1994.
25. Writing Program. Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. Syracuse: Syracuse University, 1989.