How much of the storage in the ecosystem is due to cycling?

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 357, Issue , 2014, Pages 134-142

  Ma, Qianqian ^a   Kazanci, Caner ^a,b  

^a University of Georgia   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cycling index; Ecological networks; Ecosystem model; Residence time; Storage analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOSYSTEM MODELING; ENERGY BUDGET; NETWORK ANALYSIS; RESIDENCE TIME; THROUGHFLOW;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECOSYSTEM; ENERGY METABOLISM; ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; FINN CYCLING INDEX; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENCE TIME; STIMULATION; STORAGE BASED CYCLING INDEX; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ECOSYSTEM; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84901835172     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.05.014     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Allesina S., Ulanowicz R.E. Cycling in ecological networks. Finn[U+05F3]s index revisited. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2004, 28(3):227-233.
2. Bailey R., Bras B., Allen J.K. Measuring material cycling in industrial systems. Resour., Conserv. Recycl. 2008, 52(4):643-652.
3. Baird D., Christian R., Peterson C., Johnson G. Consequences of hypoxia on estuarine ecosystem function. energy diversion from consumers to microbes. Ecol. Appl. 2004, 14(3):805-822.
4. Baird D., Luczkovich J., Christian R.R. Assessment of spatial and temporal variability in ecosystem attributes of the st marks national wildlife refuge, Apalachee Bay, Florida. Estuar., Coast. Shelf Sci. 1998, 47(3):329-349.
5. Baird D., McGlade J., Ulanowicz R., Baird D., McGlade J., Ulanowicz R. The comparative ecology of six marine ecosystems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 1991, 333(1266):15-29.
6. Baird R. The seasonal dynamics of the chesapeake bay ecosystem. Ecol. Monogr. 1989, 59:329-364.
7. Baird D., Ulanowicz R. Comparative study on the trophic structure, cycling and ecosystem properties oi iour tidal. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1993, 99:221-237.
8. Christian, R.R., Baird, D., Luczkovich, J., Johnson, J.C., Scharler, U.M., Ulanowicz, R.E., 2005. Role of network analysis in comparative ecosystem ecology of estuaries. Aquatic Food Webs. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 25-40.
9. Christian R.R., Thomas C.R. Network analysis of nitrogen inputs and cycling in the Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina, USA. Estuaries 2003, 26(3):815-828.
10. Dame R.F., Patten B.C. Analysis of energy flows in an intertidal oyster reef. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1981, 5(2):115-124.
11. DeAngelis D. Energy flow, nutrient cycling, and ecosystem resilience. Ecology 1980, 20:764-771.
12. DeAngelis D., Mulholland P., Palumbo A., Steinman A., Huston M., Elwood J. Nutrient dynamics and food-web stability. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1989, 20:71-95.
13. Doob J.L. Markoff chainsÑdenumerable case. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1945, 58:455-473.
14. MATLAB ® function for network environ analysis. Environ. Model. Softw. 2006, 21(3):375-405.
15. Fath B.D., Halnes G. Cyclic energy pathways in ecological food webs. Ecol. Model. 2007, 208(1):17-24.
16. Fath B.D., Patten B.C. Review of the foundations of network environ analysis. Ecosystems 1999, 2:167.
17. Fenchel T., Blackburn etal. Bacteria and Mineral Cycling 1979, Academic Press Inc. Ltd., London.
18. Finn J.T. Measures of ecosystem structure and function derived from analysis of flows. J. Theor. Biol. 1976, 56(2):363-380.
19. Finn J.T. Cycling index. a general definition for cycling in compartment models. Environmental Chemistry and Cycling Processes, U.S. Dep. Energy Symp 1978, vol. 45:148-164. National Technical Information Center, Springfield, VA.
20. FitzGerald G.J. Filial cannibalism in fishes. why do parents eat their offspring?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1992, 7(1):7-10.
21. Gillespie D.T. Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J. Phys. Chem. 1977, 81(25):2340-2361.
22. Gomes M.G.M., White L.J., Medley G.F. Infection, reinfection, and vaccination under suboptimal immune protection. epidemiological perspectives. J. Theor. Biol. 2004, 228(4):539-549.
23. Hatanaka T., Honda S., Sasaki S., Katayama K., Koizumi T. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation for tissue-selective inhibition of cholesterol synthesis by pravastatin. J. Pharmacokinet. Pharmacodyn. 1998, 26(3):329-347.
24. Hazen R.M., Hemley R.J., Mangum A.J. Carbon in earth[U+05F3]s interior. storage, cycling, and life. Eos, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 2012, 93(2):17-18.
25. Herendeen R. Energy intensity, residence, time exergy, and ascendency in dynamic ecosystems. Ecol. Model. 1989, 48(1):19-44.
26. Heymans J., Baird D. A carbon flow model and network analysis of the Northern Benguela Upwelling System, Namibia. Ecol. Model. 2000, 126(1):9-32.
27. Higashi M., Patten B.C. Dominance of indirect causality in ecosystems. Am. Nat. 1989, 133(2):288.
28. Jackson J.B. When ecological pyramids were upside down. Whales, Whaling, Ocean Ecosyst. 2006, 27-37.
29. Kazanci C., Ma Q. Extending ecological network analysis measures to dynamic ecosystem models. Ecol. Model. 2012, 242:180-188.
30. Kazanci C., Matamba L., Tollner E. Cycling in ecosystems. an individual based approach. Ecol. Model. 2009, 220(21):2908-2914.
31. Loreau M. Material cycling and the stability of ecosystems. Am. Nat. 1994, 143(3):508-513.
32. Ma Q., Kazanci C. Analysis of indirect effects within ecosystem models using pathway-based methodology. Ecol. Model. 2012, 252:238-245.
33. Ma Q., Kazanci C. An individual-based approach for studying system-wide properties of ecological networks. Models Ecol. Hierarchy: From Mol. Ecosphere 2012, 25:201.
34. Matamba L., Kazanci C., Schramski J.R., Blessing M., Alexander P., Patten B. Throughflow analysis. a stochastic approach. Ecol. Model. 2009, 220:3174-3181.
35. Meng B., Weinberg W. Monte Carlo simulations of temperature programmed desorption spectra. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100(7):5280-5289.
36. Metropolis N., Ulam S. The Monte Carlo method. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1949, 44(247):335-341.
37. Miehls A., Mason D., Frank K., Krause A., Peacor S., Taylor W. Invasive species impacts on ecosystem structure and function. a comparison of Oneida Lake, New York, USA, before and after zebra mussel invasion. Ecol. Model. 2009, 220(22):3194-3209.
38. Miehls A., Mason D., Frank K., Krause A., Peacor S., Taylor W. Invasive species impacts on ecosystem structure and function. a comparison of the Bay of Quinte, Canada, and Oneida Lake, USA, before and after zebra mussel invasion. Ecol. Model. 2009, 220(22):3182-3193.
39. Monaco M., Ulanowicz R. Comparative ecosystem trophic structure of three us mid-atlantic estuaries. Mar. Ecol.Prog. Ser. 1997, 161:239-254.
40. Odum E.P. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 1969, 164(3877):262-270.
41. Odum E.P. Fundamentals of Ecology 1971, Saunders, Philadelphia, 574 pp.
42. Patten B.C. Systems approach to the concept of environment. Ohio J. Sci. 1978, 78(4):206-222.
43. Patten B.C. Energy cycling in the ecosystem. Ecol. Model. 1985, 28:1-71.
44. Patten B.C. Energy cycling, length of food chains, and direct versus indirect effects in ecosystems. Ecosystem theory for Biological Oceanography. Can. Bull. Fish. Aquat. Sci 1986, 213:119-138.
45. Patten B.C., Higashi M. Modified cycling index for ecological applications. Ecol. Model. 1984, 25:69-83.
46. Pregitzer K.S., Euskirchen E.S. Carbon cycling and storage in world forests. biome patterns related to forest age. Glob. Change Biol. 2004, 10(12):2052-2077.
47. Riley J. Summary of the discussion session contributions to topic 1. what should a set of guidelines with regard to indicators contain. UNIQUAIMS Newslett. 2000, 10:5-6.
48. Rybarczyk A., Nowakowski B. A neutral network-hardware implementation using FPGA. Found. Comput. Decis. Sci. 2003, 28(1):29-40.
49. Sandberg J., Elmgren R., Wulff F. Carbon flows in baltic sea food webs - a re-evaluation using a mass balance approach. J. Mar. Syst. 2000, 25(3):249-260.
50. Scotti M. Development capacity. Ecol. Indic. 2008, 2:911-920.
51. Ulanowicz R. Growth and Development. Ecosystems Phenomenology 1986, Springer-Verlag, New York.
52. Ulanowicz, R., Bondavalli, C., Egnotovich, M., 1997. Network analysis of trophic dynamics in south florida ecosystem, fy 96: the cypress wetland ecosystem. Annual Report to the United States Geological Service Biological Resources Division. Ref. No. [umces] cbl 97-075. Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland.
53. Ulanowicz, R., Bondavalli, C., Egnotovich, M., 1998. Network analysis of trophic dynamics in south florida ecosystem, fy 97: the florida bay ecosystem. Annual Report to the United States Geological Service Biological Resources Division. Ref. No. [umces] cbl 98-123. Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland.
54. Ulanowicz, R., Bondavalli, C., Heymans, J., Egnotovich, M., 1999. Network analysis of trophic dynamics in south florida ecosystem, fy 98: the mangrove ecosystem. Annual report to the United States Geological Service Biological Resources Division. Ref. No. [UMCES] CBL 99-0073. Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland.
55. Ulanowicz, R., Heymans, J., Egnotovich, M., 2000. Network analysis of trophic dynamics in south florida ecosystems, fy 99: the graminoid ecosystem. Annual Report to the United States Geological Service Biological Resources Division Ref. No. [UMCES] CBL 00-0176. Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland.
56. Ulanowicz R.E. Identifying the structure of cycling in ecosystems. Math. Biosci. 1983, 65(August (2)):219-237.
57. Ulanowicz R.E. Quantitative methods for ecological network analysis. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2004, 28:321-339.
58. Vitousek P. Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. Am. Nat. 1982, 553-572.
59. Wulff, F., Ulanowicz, R., 1989. A comparative anatomy of the Baltic Sea and Chesapeake Bay ecosystems. Network Analysis in Marine Ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Ch. pp. 232-256.