Utilization rates of hip arthroplasty in OECD countries

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 734-741

  Pabinger, C ^a,b   Geissler, A ^c  

^a EAR (European Arthroplasty Register) Scientific Office   (Austria)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^c TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Epidemiology; Hip; Replacement; Revision; Total hip arthroplasty; Utilization rate

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; AUSTRIA; BELGIUM; CANADA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENMARK; ESTONIA; FEMALE; FINLAND; FRANCE; GERMANY; GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT; GROWTH RATE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; HUNGARY; IRELAND; ISRAEL; ITALY; KOREA; LUXEMBOURG; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEXICO; NETHERLANDS; NEW ZEALAND; NORWAY; ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT; POLAND; PORTUGAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SLOVENIA; SPAIN; SWEDEN; SWITZERLAND; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; AGE; CLINICAL TRIAL; ECONOMICS; FACTUAL DATABASE; HIP PROSTHESIS; INCIDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PATIENT SELECTION; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTILIZATION;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PATIENT SELECTION; PROGNOSIS; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEX FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84901826999     PISSN: 10634584     EISSN: 15229653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Hip and Knee Replacement. Health at a Glance 2013 OECD INDICATORS: 96. (last accessed 31.03.14). http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Health-at-a-Glance-2013.pdf.
2. Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E., Mowat F., Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. JBone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:780-785.
3. Woolf A.D., Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 2003, 81:646-656.
4. Geissler A., Scheller-Kreinsen D., Quentin W. Do diagnosis-related groups appropriately explain variations in costs and length of stay of hip replacement? A comparative assessment of DRG systems across 10 European countries. Health Econ 2012, (Suppl 2):103-115.
5. Bitton R. The economic burden of osteoarthritis. Am J Manag Care 2009, 15:S230-S235.
6. Burge R., Dawson-Hughes B., Solomon D.H., Wong J.B., King A., Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. JBone Miner Res 2007, 22:465-475.
7. Gullberg B., Johnell O., Kanis J.A. World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 1997, 7:407-413.
8. Gallo J., Havranek V., Zapletalova J. Risk factors for accelerated polyethylene wear and osteolysis in ABG I total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2010, 34:19-26.
9. Godlee F. Serious risks from metal-on-metal hip implants. BMJ 2012, 344:e1539.
10. Herberts P., Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved thequality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 2000, 71:111-121.
11. OECD OECD Health Data 2013, (online). 2074-3963, 10.1787/health-data-en.
12. Access to Essential Medicines, MDG 8 2011, United_Nations, interactive map, (last accessed 31.03.14). http://iif.un.org/content/mdg-8-access-essential-medicines.
13. EFORT-EAR. European Arthroplasty Register, Link to the Websites of Arthoplasty Registers Wolrdwide. (date last accessed 31.03.14). http://www.efort.org/education/registers.aspx.
14. Kurtz S.M., Ong K.L., Lau E., Widmer M., Maravic M., Gomez-Barrena E., et al. International survey of primary and revision total knee replacement. Int Orthop 2011, 35:1783-1789.
15. Busse R., Geissler A., Aaviksoo A., Cots F., Häkkinen U., Kobel C., Mateus C., et al. Diagnosis related groups in Europe: moving towards transparency, efficiency, and quality in hospitals?. BMJ 2013, 346:3197.
16. Colombo F. Health Wanted? Providing and Paying for Long-term Care 2011, OECD. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264097759-en.
17. OECD Major Brake in Health Spending Growth as Governments Cut Budgets in the Crisis, Says OECD 2013, OECD Health Statistics, (last accessed 31.03.14). http://www.oecd.org/newsroom/major-brake-in-health-spending-growth-as-governments-cut-budgets-in-the-crisis.htm.
18. NJR Australia, Annual Report 2012, Australia, Annual Report, (last accessed 31.03.14). https://aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide.edu.au.
19. Goran Garellick JKr, Cecilia Rogmark, Ola Rolfson, Peter Herberts Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register 2012, 62. Annual Report 2011.
20. David E. 7th Annual Report 2010, 93. National Joint Registry for England and Wales, (last accessed 31.03.14). http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/.
21. Learmonth I.D., Young C., Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 2007, 370:1508-1519.
22. Makela K.T., Matilainen M., Pulkkinen P., Fenstad A.M., Havelin L., Engesaeter L., et al. Failure rate of cemented and uncemented total hip replacements: register study of combined Nordic database of four nations. BMJ 2014, 348:f7592.
23. Makela K.T., Eskelinen A., Pulkkinen P., Paavolainen P., Remes V. Results of 3,668 primary total hip replacements for primary osteoarthritis in patients under the age of 55 years. Acta Orthop 2011, 82:521-529.