Non-linear associations between stature and mate choice characteristics for American men and their spouses

American Journal of Human Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 530-537

  Stulp, Gert ^a,b   Mills, Melinda ^a,c   Pollet, Thomas V ^d   Barrett, Louise ^e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^c NUFFIELD COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

^d VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LETHBRIDGE   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BODY HEIGHT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; REPRODUCTION; SPOUSE; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BODY HEIGHT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTION; SPOUSES; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84901791879     PISSN: 10420533     EISSN: 15206300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22559     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Barkow JH, Burley N. 1980. Human fertility, evolutionary biology, and the demographic transition. Ethol Sociobiol 1:163-180.
2. Barthold JA, Myrskylä M, Jones OR. 2012. Childlessness drives the sex difference in the association between income and reproductive success of modern Europeans. Evol Hum Behav 33:628-638.
3. Begall K. 2013. How do educational and occupational resources relate to the timing of family formation? A couple analysis of the Netherlands. Demogr Res 29:907-936.
4. Buss DM. 1989. Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav Brain Sci 12:1-14.
5. Buss DM, Abbott M, Angleitner A, Asherian A, Biaggio A, Blanco-Villasenor A, Bruchon-Schweitzer M, Ch'U H-Y, Czapinski J, Deraad B, Ekehammar B, El Lohamy N, Fioravanti M, Georgas J, Gjerde P, Guttman R, Hazan F, Iwawaki S, Janakiramaiah N, Khosroshani F, Kreitler S, Lachenicht L, Lee M, Liik K, Little B, Mika S, Moadel-Shahid M, Moane G, Montero M, Mundy-Castle AC, Niit T, Nsenduluka E, Pienkowski R, Pirtila-Backman A-M, De Leon JP, Rousseau J, Runco MA, Safir MP, Samuels C, Sanitioso R, Serpell R, Smid N, Spencer C, Tadinac M, Todorova EN, Troland K, Van Den Brande L, Van Heck G, Van Langenhove L, Yang K-S. 1990. International preferences in selecting mates. J Cross Cult Psychol 21:5-47.
6. Byars SG, Ewbank D, Govindaraju DR, Stearns SC. 2010. Natural selection in a contemporary human population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:1787-1792.
7. Case A, Paxson C. 2008. Height, health, and cognitive function at older ages. Am Econ Rev 98:463-467.
8. Cinnirella F, Winter J. 2009. Size matters! Body height and labor market discrimination: a cross-European analysis. CESifo Work Pap No. 2733:.
9. The Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. 2012. Adult height and the risk of cause-specific death and vascular morbidity in 1 million people: individual participant meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol 41:1419-1433.
10. Courtiol A, Picq S, Godelle B, Raymond M, Ferdy J-B. 2010b. From preferred to actual mate characteristics: the case of human body shape. PLoS One 5:e13010.
11. Courtiol A, Raymond M, Godelle B, Ferdy J-B. 2010a. Mate choice and human stature: homogamy as a unified framework for understanding mating preferences. Evolution 64:2189-2203.
12. Crawford CB. 1993. The future of sociobiology: counting babies or studying proximate mechanisms. Trends Ecol Evol 8:183-186.
13. Crawford CB. 2000. Evolutionary psychology: counting babies or studying information-processing mechanisms. Ann N Y Acad Sci 907:21-38.
14. Deady DK, Law Smith MJ. 2006. Height in women predicts maternal tendencies and career orientation. Pers Individ Dif 40:17-25.
15. Gillis JS, Avis WE. 1980. The male-taller norm in mate selection. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 6:396-401.
16. Goodman A, Koupil I, Lawson DW. 2012. Low fertility increases descendant socioeconomic position but reduces long-term fitness in a modern post-industrial society. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:4342-4351.
17. Hakeem R. 2001. Socio-economic differences in height and body mass index of children and adults living in urban areas of Karachi, Pakistan. Eur J Clin Nutr 55:400-406.
18. Hammoud AO, Gibson M, Peterson CM, Meikle AW, Carrell DT. 2008. Impact of male obesity on infertility: a critical review of the current literature. Fertil Steril 90:897-904.
19. Helle S. 2008. A tradeoff between reproduction and growth in contemporary Finnish women. Evol Hum Behav 29:189-195.
20. Hopcroft RL. 2006. Sex, status, and reproductive success in the contemporary United States. Evol Hum Behav 27:104-120.
21. Huber S, Bookstein FL, Fieder M. 2010. Socioeconomic status, education, and reproduction in modern women: an evolutionary perspective. Am J Hum Biol 22:578-587.
22. Hübler O. 2009. The nonlinear link between height and wages in Germany, 1985-2004. Econ Hum Biol 7:191-199.
23. Jokela M, Elovainio M, Kivimäki M. 2008. Lower fertility associated with obesity and underweight: the US National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Am J Clin Nutr 88:886-893.
24. Judge TA, Cable DM. 2004. The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: preliminary test of a theoretical model. J Appl Psychol 89:428-441.
25. Kemkes-Grottenthaler A. 2005. The short die young: the interrelationship between stature and longevity-evidence from skeletal remains. Am J Phys Anthropol 128:340-347.
26. Kurzban R, Weeden J. 2007. Do advertised preferences predict the behavior of speed daters? Pers Relat 14:623-632.
27. Lynn M, Shurgot BA. 1984. Responses to lonely hearts advertisements effects of reported physical attractiveness, physique, and coloration. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 10:349-357.
28. Magnusson PKE, Rasmussen F, Gyllensten UB. 2006. Height at age 18 years is a strong predictor of attained education later in life: cohort study of over 950 000 Swedish men. Int J Epidemiol 35:658-663.
29. Manfredini M, Breschi M, Fornasin A, Seghieri C. 2013. Height, socioeconomic status and marriage in Italy around 1900. Econ Hum Biol 11:465-473.
30. Mcintyre MH, Kacerosky PM. 2011. Age and size at maturity in women: a norm of reaction? Am J Hum Biol 23:305-312.
31. Nettle D, Pollet TV. 2008. Natural selection on male wealth in humans. Am Nat 172:658-666.
32. Oreffice S, Quintana-Domeque C. 2010. Anthropometry and socioeconomics among couples: evidence in the United States. Econ Hum Biol 8:373-384.
33. Pawlowski B. 2003. Variable preferences for sexual dimorphism in height as a strategy for increasing the pool of potential partners in humans. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 270:709-712.
34. Pawlowski B, Koziel S. 2002. The impact of traits offered in personal advertisements on response rates. Evol Hum Behav 23:139-149.
35. Pierce CA. 1996. Body height and romantic attraction: a meta-analytic test of the male-taller norm. Soc Behav Pers 24:143-149.
36. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
37. Rendall M, Clarke L, Peters H, Ranjit N, Verropoulou G. 1999. Incomplete reporting of men's fertility in the united states and britain: a research note. Demography 36:135-144.
38. Sallmén M, Sandler DP, Hoppin JA, Blair A, Baird DD. 2006. Reduced fertility among overweight and obese men. Epidemiology 17:520-523.
39. Sear R. 2010. Height and reproductive success: is bigger always better? In: Frey UJ, Störmer C, Willführ KP, editors. Homo novus-a human without illusions. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. p. 127-143.
40. Shepperd JA, Strathman AJ. 1989. attractiveness and height - the role of stature in dating preference, frequency of dating, and perceptions of attractiveness. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 15:617-627.
41. Silventoinen K, Helle S, Nisén J, Martikainen P, Kaprio J. 2013. Height, age at first birth, and lifetime reproductive success: a prospective cohort study of Finnish male and female twins. Twin Res Hum Genet 16:581-589.
42. Silventoinen K, Kaprio J, Lahelma E, Viken RJ, Rose RJ. 2003. Assortative mating by body height and BMI: Finnish twins and their spouses. Am J Hum Biol 15:620-627.
43. Silventoinen K, Krueger RF, Bouchard TJ, Kaprio J, McGue M. 2004. Heritability of body height and educational attainment in an international context: comparison of adult twins in Minnesota and Finland. Am J Hum Biol 16:544-555.
44. Silventoinen K, Lahelma E, Rahkonen O. 1999. Social background, adult body-height and health. Int J Epidemiol 28:911-918.
45. Spuhler JN. 1982. Assortative mating with respect to physical characteristics. Soc Biol 29:53-66.
46. Stearns SC, Govindaraju DR, Ewbank D, Byars SG. 2012. Constraints on the coevolution of contemporary human males and females. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:4836-4844.
47. Stommel M, Schoenborn CA. 2010. Variations in BMI and prevalence of health risks in Diverse racial and ethnic populations. Obesity 18:1821-1826.
48. Stulp G, Buunk AP, Kurzban R, Verhulst S. 2013c. The height of choosiness: mutual mate choice for stature results in suboptimal pair formation for both sexes. Anim Behav 86:37-46.
49. Stulp G, Buunk AP, Pollet TV. 2013b. Women want taller men more than men want shorter women. Pers Individ Dif 54:877-883.
50. Stulp G, Buunk AP, Pollet TV, Nettle D, Verhulst S. 2013d. Are human mating preferences with respect to height reflected in actual pairings? PLoS One 8:e54186.
51. Stulp G, Buunk AP, Verhulst S, Pollet TV. 2013a. Tall claims? Sense and nonsense about the importance of height of US presidents. Leadersh Quart 24:159-171.
52. Stulp G, Buunk AP, Verhulst S, Pollet TV. 2012a. High and mighty: height increases authority in professional refereeing. Evol Psychol 10:588-601.
53. Stulp G, Kuijper B, Buunk AP, Pollet TV, Verhulst S. 2012d. Intralocus sexual conflict over human height. Biol Lett 8:976-978.
54. Stulp G, Pollet TV, Verhulst S, Buunk AP. 2012b. A curvilinear effect of height on reproductive success in human males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:375-384.
55. Stulp G, Verhulst S, Pollet TV, Buunk AP. 2012c. The effect of female height on reproductive success is negative in Western populations, but more variable in non-Western populations. Am J Hum Biol 24:486-494.
56. Symons D. 1990. Adaptiveness and adaptation. Ethol Sociobiol 11:427-444.
57. Tooby J, Cosmides L. 1997. Think again. In: Betzig L, editor. Human nature: a critical reader. NY: Oxford University Press. p. 292-294.
58. Tovée MJ, Reinhardt S, Emery JL, Cornelissen PL. 1998. Optimum body-mass index and maximum sexual attractiveness. Lancet 352:548.
59. Veleva Z, Tiitinen A, Vilska S, Hydén-Granskog C, Tomás C, Martikainen H, Tapanainen JS. 2008. High and low BMI increase the risk of miscarriage after IVF/ICSI and FET. Hum Reprod 23:878-884.
60. Vining DR. 1986. Social versus reproductive success: the central theoretical problem of human sociobiology. Behav Brain Sci 9:167-187.