Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation - Reply

JAMA

Volumn 311, Issue 21, 2014, Pages 2234-2235

  Rubertsson, Sten ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIAC RESUSCITATOR; CARDIOVASCULAR PROCEDURE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DEFIBRILLATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; MECHANICAL CHEST COMPRESSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; RESUSCITATION; TIME TO TREATMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; CARDIOVERSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; OUT OF HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST;

CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; ELECTRIC COUNTERSHOCK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST;

EID: 84901782861     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.2113     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Rubertsson S, Silfverstolpe J, Rehn L, et al. The study protocol for the LINC (LUCAS in Cardiac Arrest) study: a study comparing conventional adult out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a concept with mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013;21:5.
2. Li Y, Wang H, Cho JH, et al. Defibrillation delivered during the upstroke phase of manual chest compression improves shock success. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(3):910-915.
3. Li Y, Yu T, Ristagno G, et al. The optimal phasic relationship between synchronized shock and mechanical chest compressions. Resuscitation. 2010;81(6):724-729.