Scientific data and its limits: Rethinking the use of evidence in local climate change policy

Evidence and Policy

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 187-203

  Pearce, Warren ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Climate change; Evidence based policy; Local government; Performance management

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901782707     PISSN: 17442648     EISSN: 17442656     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1332/174426514X13990326347801     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. AEA Technology, 2008, Analysis to support climate change indicators for local authorities, London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
2. Andrews, R, Boyne, GA, Law, J, Walker, RM, 2005, External constraints on local service standards: The case of comprehensive performance assessment in English local government, Public Administration 83, 3, 639-56
3. Audit Commission, 2009, Lofty ambitions: The role of councils reducing domestic CO2 emissions, London: Audit Commission
4. Big Ask, 2008, UK Climate Change and Energy Bills get royal assent, Big Ask, www.thebigask.eu/news/climate-change-and-energy-bills-get-royal-assent.html
5. Carty, T, Hislop, H, 2007, Changing places: Advancing local government action on climate change, London: Green Alliance
6. Centre for Sustainable Energy, 2005, Locating local authority agencies and influence in energy governance in the UK, Bristol: Centre for Sustainable Energy
7. Climate Sock, 2010, Before we get carried away, www.climatesock.com/2010/ 05/before-we-get-carried-away/#more-254
8. Cohen, S, Demeritt, D, Robinson, J, Rothman, D, 1998, Climate change and sustainable development: Towards dialogue, Global Environmental Change 8, 4, 341-71
9. Demeritt, D, 2001, The construction of global warming and the politics of science, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91, 2, 307-37
10. DCLG (Department for Communities and Local Government), 2008, National indicators for local authorities and local authority partnerships: Handbook of definitions, London: DCLG
11. DECC (Department of Energy and Climate Change), 2009a, Local Authority CO2 Emissions Estimates 2007: Methodology summary, London: DECC
12. DECC, 2009b, The UK's fifth national communication under the United Nations framework convention on climate change, London: DECC
13. DECC, 2011, 2009 National Statistics on carbon dioxide emissions at local authority and regional level, Frequently Asked Questions, DECC, http://webarchive.nationalarchives. gov.uk/20111205171452/http://decc.gov.uk/ assets/decc/11/stats/climatechange/2761-frequently-asked-questions.pdf
14. DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), 2007, Debate on climate science is over: International political agreement now urgently needed, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20070305103412/http://www. defra.gov.uk/news/2007/070202a.htm
15. Eadson, W, 2008, Climate change mitigation in Local Area Agreements: An enforced lack of ambition? People, Place and Policy Online 2, 3, 140-50
16. Eastin, J, Grundmann, R, Prakash, A, 2011, The two limits debates: 'Limits to Growth' and climate change, Futures 43, 1, 16-26
17. EMCCP (East Midlands Climate Change Partnership), 2009, Tackling climate change in the East Midlands: Regional programme of action 2009-11, Climate East Midlands
18. Espeland, WN, Stevens, ML, 2008, A sociology of quantification, European Journal of Sociology 49, 03, 401
19. Flyvbjerg, B, 2006, Five misunderstandings about case-study research, Qualitative Inquiry 12, 2, 219-45
20. Footitt, A, Wood, R, Turnpenny, J, 2007, Review of local government action on climate change, Norwich: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research
21. Greenhalgh, T, Russell, J, 2009, Evidence-based policymaking: A critique, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 52, 2, 304-18
22. Grundmann, R, Stehr, N, 2012, The power of scientific knowledge: From research to public policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
23. Hansen, J, Johnson, D, Lacis, A, Lebedeff, S, Lee, P, Rind, D, Russell, G, 1981, Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide, Science 213, 4511, 957-66
24. Hood, C, 2006, Gaming in targetworld: The targets approach to managing British public services, Public Administration Review 66, 4, 515-21
25. House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee, 2008, Climate change and local, regional and devolved government, HC225, London: The Stationery Office
26. Hulme, M, 2009, Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
27. Hulme, M, 2013, Exploring climate change through science and in society, Abingdon: Earthscan
28. Hulme, M, Turnpenny, J, 2004, Understanding and managing climate change: The UK experience, Geographical Journal 170, 2, 105-15
29. Jackson, P, 1988, The management of performance in the public sector, Public Money and Management 8, 4, 11-16
30. Jasanoff, S, 2010, A new climate for society, Theory, Culture and Society 27, 2-3, 233-53
31. Jaspal, R, Nerlich, B, 2014, When climate science became climate politics: British media representations of climate change in 1988, Public Understanding of Science 23, 2, 122-41
32. Kellogg, W, 1987, Mankind's impact on climate: The evolution of an awareness, Climatic Change 10, 2, 113-36
33. Latour, B, 2004, Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern, Critical Inquiry 30, 2, 225-48
34. Machin, A, 2013, Negotiating climate change: Radical democracy and the illusion of consensus, London: Zed Books
35. Majone, G, 1989, Evidence, argument, and persuasion in the policy process, New Haven: Yale University Press
36. Miller, CA, 2004, Climate science and the making of a global political order, in Jasanoff, S (ed), States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order, London: Routledge, 46-66
37. Nerlich, B, Koteyko, N, Brown, B, 2010, Theory and language of climate change communication, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1, 1, 97-110
38. Pearce, G, Cooper, S, 2011, Sub-national responses to climate change in England: Evidence from Local Area Agreements, Local Government Studies 37, 2, 199-217
39. Pearce, W, 2013, The meanings of climate change policy: Implementing carbon reduction in the East Midlands, PhD thesis, University of Nottingham, http://etheses.nottingham.ac.uk/3680
40. Pielke Jr., RA, 2007, The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
41. Prins, G, Galiana, I, Green, C, Grundmann, R, Hulme, M, Korhola, A, Laird, F, Nordhaus, T, Pielke Jr., R, Rayner, S, Shellenberger, M, Stehr, N, Hiroyuki, T, 2010, The Hartwell Paper: A new direction for climate policy after the crash of 2009, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27939
42. Rayner, S, 2010, How to eat an elephant: A bottom-up approach to climate policy, Climate Policy 10, 6, 615-21
43. Rubin, HJ, Rubin, IS, 2005, Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
44. Sanderson, I, 2003, Is it 'what works' that matters? Evaluation and evidence-based policy-making, Research Papers in Education 18, 4, 331-45
45. Sarewitz, D, 2004, How science makes environmental controversies worse, Environmental Science and Policy 7, 5, 385-403
46. Sarewitz, D, 2011, Does climate change knowledge really matter? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2, 4, 475-81
47. Sarewitz, D, Pielke Jr., RA, 2000, Breaking the global-warming gridlock, Atlantic Monthly 286, 1, 54-64
48. Schroeder, H, Bulkeley, H, 2009, Global cities and the governance of climate change: What is the role of law in cities? Fordham Urban Law Journal 36, 2, 313-59
49. Scott, F, 2011, Is localism delivering for climate change? Green Alliance, www.greenalliance.org.uk/grea1.aspx?id=6108
50. Stephens, N, 2007, Collecting data from elites and ultra elites: Telephone and faceto-face interviews with macroeconomists, Qualitative Research 7, 2, 203-16
51. Stone, D, 2002, Policy paradox: The art of political decision making, New York: WW Norton
52. Sullivan, H, 2011, 'Truth' junkies: Using evaluation in UK public policy, Policy & Politics 39, 4, 499-512
53. Swyngedouw, E, 2010, Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change, Theory, Culture and Society 27, 2-3, 213-32
54. The Economist, 2010, May 11, Oblique strategies, www.economist.com/node/ 16099521?story-id=16099521
55. Van Gunsteren, HR, 1976, The quest for control: A critique of the rational-centralrule approach in public affairs, London: Wiley
56. Weiss, CH, 1991, Policy research as advocacy: Pro and con, Knowledge and Policy 4, 1, 37-55
57. Whitmarsh, L, 2009, Behavioural responses to climate change: Asymmetry of intentions and impacts, Journal of Environmental Psychology 29, 1, 13-23
58. Wilson, D, Game, C, 2006, Local government in the UK: Government beyond the centre (4th edn), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
59. Wynne, B, 1992, Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science, Public Understanding of Science 1, 3, 281-304
60. Wynne, B, 2010, When doubt becomes a weapon, Nature 466, 7305, 441-2
61. Yanow, D, 2000, Conducting interpretive policy analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
62. Yanow, D, Schwartz-Shea, P, 2006, Introduction, in Yanow, D, Schwartz-Shea, P (eds), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn, Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe, xi-xxvii