Recruitment of women in the national children's study initial vanguard study

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 179, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 1366-1374

  Baker, Dean ^a,h   Park, Christina ^b   Sweeney, Carol ^c   McCormack, Lacey ^d   Durkin, Maureen ^e   Brenner, Ruth ^b   Dabelea, Dana ^f   Entwisle, Barbara ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^f Food Science and Human Nutrition   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

birth cohort; children; epidemiology; National Children's Study; population; recruitment; sampling

Indexed keywords

CHILD HEALTH; COHORT ANALYSIS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; RECRUITMENT (EMPLOYMENT); SAMPLING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOUSEHOLD; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; PREGNANT WOMAN; TELEPHONE;

UNITED STATES;

BIRTH COHORT; CHILDREN; EPIDEMIOLOGY; NATIONAL CHILDREN'S STUDY; POPULATION; RECRUITMENT; SAMPLING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PILOT PROJECTS; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SAMPLING STUDIES; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84901721550     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: 14766256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwu062     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Landrigan PJ, Trasande L, Thorpe LE, et al. The National Children's Study: a 21-year prospective study of 100, 000 American children. Pediatrics. 2006;118(5):2173-2186. (Pubitemid 46393701)
2. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. The National Children's Study Research Plan: A Review. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2008.
3. Lyerly AD, Little MO, Faden RR. The National Children's Study: a golden opportunity to advance the health of pregnant women. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(10):1742-1745.
4. Hirschfeld S, Songco D, Kramer BS, et al. National Children's Study: update in 2010. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011;78(1):119-125.
5. Sauvage LM. For our children: the National Children's Study. Hawaii Med J. 2011;70(5):102-103.
6. Walter EB, Dole N, Siega-Riz AM, et al. The National Children's Study in North Carolina: a study of the effect of the environment on children's health, growth, and development. N C Med J. 2011;72(2):160-164.
7. Mortensen ME, Hirschfeld S. The National Children's Study: an opportunity for medical toxicology. J Med Toxicol. 2012; 8(2):160-165.
8. Hirschfeld S, Kramer B, Guttmacher A. Current status of the National Children's Study. Epidemiology. 2010;21(5): 605-606.
9. Montaquila JM, Brick JM, Curtin LR. Statistical and practical issues in the design of a national probability sample of births for the Vanguard Study of the National Children's Study. Stat Med. 2010;29(13):1368-1376.
10. Kish L. Survey Sampling. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1965.
11. Dreiling K, Trushenski S, Kayongo-Male D, et al. Comparing household listing techniques in a rural midwestern Vanguard Center of the National Children's Study. Public Health Nurs. 2009;26(2):192-201.
12. White E, Armstrong BK, Saracci R. Ch. 11. Response rates and their maximization. In: Principles of Exposure Measurement in Epidemiology: Collecting, Evaluating, and Improving Measures of Disease Risk Factors. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2008: 357-392.
13. Cheshire H, Ofstedal MB, Scholes S, et al. A comparison of response rates in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing and the Health and Retirement Study. Longit Life Course Stud. 2011;2(2):127-144.
14. Golding J, Birmingham K. Enrollment and response rates in a longitudinal birth cohort. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009; 23(suppl 1):73-85.
15. Trasande L, Andrews HF, Goranson C, et al. Early experiences and predictors of recruitment success for the National Children's Study. Pediatrics. 2011;127(2):261-268.
16. Sapienza JN, Corbie-Smith G, Keim S, et al. Community engagement in epidemiological research. Ambul Pediatr. 2007; 7(3):247-252. (Pubitemid 46760366)
17. Lakes KD, Vaughan E, Jones M, et al. Diverse perceptions of the informed consent process: implications for the recruitment and participation of diverse communities in the National Children's Study. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;49(1-2): 215-232.