Analysis of data interchange formats for interoperable and efficient data communication in clouds

Proceedings - 2013 IEEE/ACM 6th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing, UCC 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 393-398

  Emeakaroha, Vincent C ^a   Healy, Philip ^a   Fatema, Kaniz ^a   Morrison, John P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Cloud Computing; Data Interchange Format; Efficient Communication; Interoperability; Message Bus System

Indexed keywords

CLOUD COMPUTING; COMMUNICATION; CONVOLUTIONAL CODES;

ANALYSIS OF DATA; DATA INTERCHANGE FORMAT; DATA-COMMUNICATION; EFFICIENT COMMUNICATIONS; INTEGRATION OF SERVICES; MESSAGE BUS; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; USE CASE SCENARIO;

INTEROPERABILITY;

EID: 84901684294     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/UCC.2013.79     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. T. Bray, J. Paoli, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, E. Maler, and F. Yergeau. Extensible markup language (XML). World Wide Web Journal, 2(4):27-66, 1997.
2. A. Edmonds, T. Metsch, A. Pappspyrou, and A. Richardson. Towards an open cloud standard. IEEE Internet Computing, 16(4):15-25, 2012.
3. V. C. Emeakaroha, I. Brandic, M. Maurer, and S. Dustdar. Low level metrics to high level SLAs-LoM2HiS framework: Bridging the gap between monitored metrics and SLA parameters in cloud environments. In 2010 International Conference on High Performance Computing and Simulation (HPCS), pages 48-54, July 2010.
4. B. Gil and P. Trezentos. Impacts of data interchange formats on energy consumption and performance in smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2011 Workshop on Open Source and Design of Communication, OSDOC '11, pages 1-6, 2011.
5. G. Kaur and M. Fuad. An evaluation of protocol buffer. In Proceedings of the IEEE SoutheastCon 2010 (SoutheastCon), pages 459-462, 2010.
6. K. Maeda. Comparative survey of object serialization techniques and the programming support. Journal of Communication and Computer, 9:920-928, 2012.
7. K. Maeda. Performance evaluation of object serialization libraries in XML, JSON and binary formats. In 2012 Second International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and it's Applications (DICTAP), pages 177-182, 2012.
8. Mail Bypass Inc. Message bus platform. www.messagebus.com Accessed on: 17 June, 2013.
9. O. Miguel-Hurtado, L. Mengibar-Pozo, I. Tomeo-Reyes, and J. Liu-Jimenez. Analysis on compact data formats for the performance of handwritten signature biometrics. In 43rd Annual 2009 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology, pages 339-346, 2009.
10. K. Pepple. Deploying OpenStack. Ó Reilly, 2011.
11. D. Petcu. Portability and interoperability between clouds: challenges and case study. In Proceedings of the 4th European conference on Towards a service-based internet, Service-Wave'11, pages 62-74, 2011.
12. N.-L. Tran, S. Skhiri, and E. Zimanyi. EQS: An elastic and scalable message queue for the cloud. In 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), pages 391-398, 2011.
13. S. Vinoski. Advanced message queuing protocol. IEEE Internet Computing, 10(6):87-89, 2006.
14. L. Wang, J. Zhan, W. Shi, and Y. Liang. In cloud, can scientific communities benefit from the economies of scale? IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 23(2):296-303, 2012.
15. P. Wang, X. Wu, and H. Yang. Analysis of the efficiency of data transmission format based on Ajax applications. In 2011 International Conference on Information Technology, Computer Engineering and Management Sciences (ICM), volume 4, pages 265-268, 2011.
16. Y. Yahui. Impact data-exchange based on XML. In Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 2012 7th International Conference on, pages 1147-1149. IEEE, 2012.
17. Z. Zhang, C. Wu, and D. W. Cheung. A survey on cloud interoperability: taxonomies, standards, and practice. SIG-METRICS Performance Evaluation Rev., 40(4):13-22, Apr. 2013.