Potential predictors of side-branch occlusion in bifurcation lesions after percutaneous coronary intervention: A coronary CT angiography study

Radiology

Volumn 271, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 711-720

  Park, Jin Joo ^a   Chun, Eun Ju ^a   Cho, Young Seok ^a   Oh, Il Young ^a   Yoon, Chang Hwan ^a   Suh, Jung Won ^a   Choi, Sang Il ^a   Youn, Tae Jin ^a   Koo, Bon Kwon ^b   Chae, In Ho ^a   Choi, Dong Ju ^a  

^a Seoul National University Bundang Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERIAL WALL THICKNESS; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; BLOOD CLOT LYSIS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY OCCLUSION; CORONARY BIFURCATION LESION; CORONARY STENT; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SIDE BRANCH OCCLUSION;

CARDIAC-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IOPAMIDOL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84901683070     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14131959     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S. Hemody-namic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 1999;282(21):2035-2042.
2. Latib A, Colombo A. Bifurcation disease: what do we know, what should we do? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1(3):218-226.
3. Meier B, Gruentzig AR, King SB 3rd, et al. Risk of side branch occlusion during coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1984;53(1): 10-14.
4. Al Suwaidi J, Yeh W, Cohen HA, Detre KM, Williams DO, Holmes DR Jr. Immediate and one-year outcome in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions in the modern era (NHL-BI dynamic registry). Am J Cardiol 2001; 87(10):1139-1144.
5. Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R, et al. Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic bifurcation study. Circulation 2006;114(18):1955-1961.
6. Colombo A, Moses JW, Morice MC, et al. Randomized study to evaluate sirolimus-eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions. Circulation 2004;109(10): 1244-1249.
7. Pan M, de Lezo JS, Medina A, et al. Ra-pamycin-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcated coronary lesions: a randomized comparison of a simple versus complex strategy. Am Heart J 2004;148(5):857-864.
8. Colombo A, Bramucci E, Saccà S, et al. Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side-branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations: the CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) study. Circulation 2009;119(1):71-78.
9. Ferenc M, Gick M, Kienzle RP, et al. Randomized trial on routine vs. provisional T-stent-ing in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions. Eur Heart J 2008;29(23): 2859-2867.
10. Hildick-Smith D, de Belder AJ, Cooter N, et al. Randomized trial of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions: the British Bifurcation Coronary Study-old, new, and evolving strategies. Circulation 2010;121(10):1235-1243.
11. Achenbach S. Cardiac CT: state of the art for the detection of coronary arterial stenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2007;1(1): 3-20.
12. Abdulla J, Abildstrom SZ, Gotzsche O, Christensen E, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C. 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiogra-phy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2007;28(24):3042-3050.
13. Lefèvre T, Louvard Y, Morice MC, et al. Stenting of bifurcation lesions: classifcation, treatments, and results. Catheter Cardio-vasc Interv 2000;49(3):274-283.
14. Chun EJ, Lee W, Choi YH, et al. Effects of nitroglycerin on the diagnostic accuracy of electrocardiogram-gated coronary computed tomography angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008;32(1):86-92.
15. Van Mieghem CA, Thury A, Meijboom WB, et al. Detection and characterization of coronary bifurcation lesions with 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiogra-phy. Eur Heart J 2007;28(16):1968-1976.
16. Karagounis L, Sorensen SG, Menlove RL, Moreno F, Anderson JL. Does thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) perfusion grade 2 represent a mostly patent artery or a mostly occluded artery? enzymatic and electrocardiographic evidence from the TEAM-2 study. Second Multicenter Thrombolysis Trial of Eminase in Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19(1):1-10.
17. Anderson JL, Karagounis LA, Becker LC, Sorensen SG, Menlove RL. TIMI perfu-sion grade 3 but not grade 2 results in improved outcome after thrombolysis for myocardial infarction: ventriculographic, enzymatic, and electrocardiographic evidence from the TEAM-3 study. Circulation 1993; 87(6):1829-1839.
18. Aliabadi D, Tilli F V, Bowers TR, et al. Incidence and angiographic predictors of side branch occlusion following high-pressure intracoronary stenting. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80(8):994-997.
19. Vassilev D, Gil RJ. Relative dependence of diameters of branches in coronary bifurcations after stent implantation in main vessel: importance of carina position. Kardiol Pol 2008; 66(4):371-378; discussion 379.
20. Koo BK, Waseda K, Kang HJ, et al. Anatomic and functional evaluation of bifurcation lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3(2):113-119.
21. Ahmed JM, Mintz GS, Weissman NJ, et al. Mechanism of lumen enlargement during intracoronary stent implantation: an intra-vascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2000; 102(1):7-10.
22. Papadopoulou SL, Brugaletta S, Garcia-Garcia HM, et al. Assessment of atherosclerotic plaques at coronary bifurcations with multidetector computed tomography angi-ography and intravascular ultrasound-virtual histology. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;13(8):635-642.
23. Poerner TC, Kralev S, Voelker W, et al. Natural history of small and medium-sized side branches after coronary stent implantation. Am Heart J 2002;143(4):627-635.
24. Furukawa E, Hibi K, Kosuge M, et al. In-travascular ultrasound predictors of side branch occlusion in bifurcation lesions after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ J 2005;69(3):325-330.
25. Costa RA, Mintz GS, Carlier SG, et al. Bifurcation coronary lesions treated with the "crush" technique: an intravascular ultrasound analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46(4): 599-605.
26. Hahn JY, Gwon HC, Kwon SU, et al. Comparison of vessel geometry in bifurcation between normal and diseased segments: in-travascular ultrasound analysis. Atherosclerosis 2008;201(2):326-331.
27. Kang SJ, Mintz GS, Kim WJ, et al. Prein-tervention angiographic and intravascular ultrasound predictors for side branch compromise after a single-stent crossover technique. Am J Cardiol 2011;107(12):1787-1793.